Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash (1339887) | |||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash |
|
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Sat Feb 14 20:51:20 2015, in response to Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash, posted by Joe V on Sat Feb 14 20:07:21 2015. "People want a fast, reliable electric railroad. "WRONG. People want fast reliable TRANSPORTATION. They could give a rats ass if its electric, diesel or mule train. The point of my post was that you get more bang for your buck with reliable diesel equiptment that has been proven out on MN's Hudson Line over several years. Granted, the'll be some elitist snobs that think they shit ice cream & insist that the dirty stinky diesel is a relic of the past & electric is the way to go (Harlem Line included), they don't have their facts straight. The overall emissions of a modern diesel locomotive is much cleaner than the old FL-9s that ran there years ago & the cost of fuels that run electric plants to power the third rail overall is much higher now v/s then. Its just a bottom line thing. |