|
|
| Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash (1340134) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 16 14:49:30 2015, in response to Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash, posted by R2ChinaTown on Mon Feb 16 08:47:42 2015. They need to turn a bit. The wind issue up here is that there's usually some wind in the morning and late afternoon, but often winds are calm and insufficient to get them moving at all. What GE discovered was yes, they turned most of the time, but never really produced enough power to cover the expense. Things I'm sure are quite different elsewhere. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|