|
|
| Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash (1339967) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Sun Feb 15 10:11:27 2015, in response to Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash, posted by j trainloco on Sun Feb 15 10:03:27 2015. ALP45DP is another species entirely and cost $10 million each.NJT needs 5 out of 35 on any given day for their intended purpose. Quite a scandal. Upper Harlem got a pretty dense service prior to 1984 with FL-9's and Penn Central junk coaches. It was nothing as bad a Poughkeepsie's. That is why Brewster line's ridership did not quadruple. Amtrak MN, and LIRR all need to collaborate on a common loco. But LIRR is hell bent on junking the M-3's and keeping the Super Steel junk. M-3's work fine if they are maintained. LIRR proves it everyday because they do not. MN proves it everyday because they do. |
|
|
|