Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash (1340235) | |||
![]() |
|||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
![]() |
Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 16 20:44:13 2015, in response to Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Mon Feb 16 20:00:18 2015. Agreed. But at least the population and ridership there has gotten to the point where the economics would at least work out. I remember when Poughkeepsie trains were far apart on the schedule. Sure, you could get to Croton North and WALK. :)What makes me giggle is from there north. 14 round trips a day for all Amtrak north of there isn't exactly a busy railroad. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |