|
|
| Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash (1339904) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Sat Feb 14 21:30:56 2015, in response to Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash, posted by Dutchrailnut on Sat Feb 14 21:27:46 2015. You somehow don't seem to realize that the existing systems all have to be replaced over cycles anyway. My supposition is that the relative increase in cost for a dual power EMU over third rail only EMU is at least partially if not totally made up for by the greatly decreased number of substations which need replacement. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|