Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash (1340213) | |||
![]() |
|||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
![]() |
Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash |
|
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Mon Feb 16 20:00:18 2015, in response to Re: How 3rd Rail Running Commuter Rail Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 16 19:29:01 2015. "POK makes sense.."Our grandkids may see it...or maybe not, if advances in diesel engine reliability,economics & performance keep up the pace with mechanical evolution that keeps it a less expensive option. The average commuter could care less if they don't expierience the extra G force when leaving the station that accompianies electric trains. Just get me back & forth to work & don't saddle me with bond issues to pay for something that we can live without, as in unnecessary electrification. Just ask the upper Hudson Line (95% on time) clintele of MN If they are satisfied with their service. Customer satisfaction ratings are at an all time high. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |