|
|
| Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? (200816) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 5 |
||
|
| (201326) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Thu Mar 15 12:49:13 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Thu Mar 15 12:00:05 2007. Didn't he also blow up that "tylenol" factory in the Sudan?"Don't Change Horses Midstream" Wag the...I mean Dick. |
|
|
| (201343) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Mar 15 16:20:03 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by italianstallion on Thu Mar 15 10:26:15 2007. Now we're supposed to scan all the police blotters AND research the offender's party affiliation else we be called hypocrites. Dunno bout you but I got a day job already :Dyour pal, Fred |
|
|
| (201350) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Thu Mar 15 17:43:22 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by italianstallion on Thu Mar 15 10:26:15 2007. You'd hear of him if you subsribed to the daily fax/email blast from the GOP. And on the plus side, you'd get bullet points on exactly what to say too.Those Duke Cunningham sex parties sounded legandary. Guess he wasn't as reserved as Foley, and the parties were probably not as good as the guy who had to embarrassingly resign from the race in Illinois. But if I was married to the blonde from Deep Space 9, I'd talk her into doing the same he did. |
|
|
| (201356) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 15 18:52:28 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by BIE on Thu Mar 15 08:08:42 2007. You got Alberto? That's only because the Republicans have memories that are only slightly shorter than the dummycrats. Let's warp back to 1993 when Janet Reno fired 92 of the 93 US attorneys. You do remeber that, don't you. Do you think that some of those firings might have been political. How come if I can remember that, none of you left-leaners can. What about the massive research capabilities of the NY Slimes? Hypocrites? |
|
|
| (201357) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Mar 15 18:54:00 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 15 18:52:28 2007. Clinton already got lumped up for doing that...in 1993. Damn, every pundit EVEN ON FOX TV shot that one down bro...your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (201365) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Thu Mar 15 19:14:09 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by orange blossom special on Wed Mar 14 19:32:16 2007. Actually they are more like the slave labor 'class'. The real working class are either gonna be on welfare or pushed out entirely.. |
|
|
| (201371) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Mar 15 19:27:15 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Fred G on Wed Mar 14 17:28:20 2007. 11/2008 is a long way away. |
|
|
| (201372) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Mar 15 19:32:22 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Fred G on Thu Mar 15 18:54:00 2007. Reno did it at the beginning of the administration, following 12 years of rule by the "other" party. It wasn't unusual. What Gonzalez did is. Democrats and the MSM seem to think that because it's unusual, it must be unusually sinister. |
|
|
| (201379) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Thu Mar 15 19:46:44 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 15 18:52:28 2007. We got the scumbag. And we'll get pace too. DOWN, DOWN, the nazi henchmen GO. I LOVE IT!!! |
|
|
| (201412) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 15 21:12:24 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Fred G on Thu Mar 15 18:54:00 2007. Was Reno forced to resign? Even after she killed all the women and children in Waco, she never resigned. |
|
|
| (201414) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 15 21:13:39 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by BIE on Thu Mar 15 19:46:44 2007. What exactly did Alberto Gonzales do that makes him a scumbag? |
|
|
| (201416) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Thu Mar 15 21:20:32 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 15 21:13:39 2007. he is a member of the most corrupt political entity since nazi germany. |
|
|
| (201418) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 15 21:23:04 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by BIE on Thu Mar 15 21:20:32 2007. He is not a member of Nancy Pelosi's "honest & ethical" congress. Face it, John. Nancy Pelosi is presiding over a criminal enterprise only rivaled by John Gotti. If you endorse her activities then shame on you, too. |
|
|
| (201422) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Rail Blue on Thu Mar 15 21:41:33 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 15 21:23:04 2007. Have you ever met a politician of any persuasion who wasn't at least one of: (1) a criminal; (2) an immoralist; (3) a lunatic; (4) an idiot; (5) a philanderer? |
|
|
| (201428) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 15 22:13:59 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Rail Blue on Thu Mar 15 21:41:33 2007. I've met relatively few politicians in my life. John V. Lindsay and Nelson Rockerfeller are the two who come immediately to mind. While Rockerfeller fell into #5 catagory, I can't catagorize John Lindsay in any of the 5 you've mentioned. |
|
|
| (201438) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Thu Mar 15 22:41:16 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 15 21:23:04 2007. John Gotti would sound safer and less corrupt than what we got going on right now. But blind followers dont' follow what's going on, tunnel vision. |
|
|
| (201439) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Thu Mar 15 22:41:49 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Rail Blue on Thu Mar 15 21:41:33 2007. It depends on what the GOP talking points memo says that day. |
|
|
| (201440) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Thu Mar 15 22:43:17 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by BIE on Wed Mar 14 20:38:40 2007. Where does all the defense money go to? Are there factories around or something? I don't hear about anything like that. All I know is DC had the highest rate of growth out of any city ever since the lobbyiest crony administration came in. |
|
|
| (201441) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Thu Mar 15 22:44:23 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Wed Mar 14 18:27:25 2007. How can I, they put a spell on me. It's as if you're a mermaid that's pushy and squabbles and a lot. |
|
|
| (201448) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 15 22:58:52 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by orange blossom special on Thu Mar 15 22:44:23 2007. I think it's more than that, blossom. But, clearly you are the distaff side of this relationship - and rightfully so. |
|
|
| (201495) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri Mar 16 05:45:02 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 15 21:12:24 2007. Another matter that's been resolved in the last decade. What's that got to do with current affairs? Is the current situation right or wrong?your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (201496) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri Mar 16 05:52:13 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Mar 15 19:32:22 2007. Were it an isolated incident, it probably wouldn't gather up a storm like this. However it's just another episode of an executive branch thinking it's above the law.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (201501) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Fri Mar 16 07:14:39 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 15 21:23:04 2007. I am not talking about Speaker Pelosi's House of Representatives. She is not a nazi republican. She's the CURE, NOT the CANCER. |
|
|
| (201502) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Fri Mar 16 07:20:14 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by orange blossom special on Thu Mar 15 22:43:17 2007. Sure, they have factories. You need a batchelor's degree to get in the door. We'd be better off if half of them went away. |
|
|
| (201503) | |
Re: Could Train Dude Be President? |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Fri Mar 16 07:23:31 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 15 22:58:52 2007. Get a Republican with real spunk who would reform the party while keeping many of its core principles. |
|
|
| (201513) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Fri Mar 16 10:43:47 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by BIE on Fri Mar 16 07:14:39 2007. She is a cancer.She is NOT a cure. ROAR |
|
|
| (201514) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 10:48:14 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by BIE on Fri Mar 16 07:14:39 2007. Can you honestly say that you believe that, John. Just look at what she's tried to force down this country's throat under the guise of "the most ethical and honest congress in history".[1] Jack Murtha who turned down $50,000 during AbScam and was caught on tape refusing the money until he knew them better. [2] Alcee Hastings - who she was pressured to withdraw from consideration because of the brewing 'shit-storm' that would have come. [3] William "Cold-Cash" Jefferson appointed as a committee member when he should have been forced to resign. Nancy Pelosi is thhe head of a government sanctioned criminal enterprise. If you do not recognize that then I'm significantly disappointed. |
|
|
| (201515) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Fri Mar 16 10:49:06 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by BIE on Fri Mar 16 07:20:14 2007. What? You want good factory jobs for schlubs who could barely graduate from high school? High tech products from high tech factories require skilled high tech employees.One of the root problems in this country is the failure of the school system. They function like a transit authority. Train can't make the station on time, so change the timetable. Hello. A passing grade is a passing grade given for work done correctly, neatly, and with thought and insight into the issues at hand. A failing grade means you don't know jack and should find a job sweeping floors. (Digging a ditch is now high tech, sorry.) Today's college degree is little more than what a high school diploma used to be worth. Boo Hoo..... ROAR |
|
|
| (201517) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 10:52:42 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Fred G on Fri Mar 16 05:45:02 2007. How was it resolved? Was reno forced to resign after firing 92 of 93 US attornies? Was she forced to resign after WACO? There seems to be an epidemic of very short and selective memory here.If the US attornies serve at the pleasure of the President, then I see no wrong-doing here. Much like the governor coming in and wanting his own MTA chairman - it's political but it's legal. This is just another democratic shit-storm over nothing and the republicans seem to have forgotten how to tell them to "fuck-off". |
|
|
| (201525) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Fri Mar 16 12:56:22 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Fred G on Fri Mar 16 05:52:13 2007. Wrong, nothing that was done here was illegal. It just broke with established precedent. |
|
|
| (201537) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri Mar 16 13:28:58 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Fri Mar 16 12:56:22 2007. You're right, it's not illegal. He could turn over the judges on a monthly basis if he wanted to.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (201540) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri Mar 16 13:35:18 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 10:52:42 2007. Read the first part of your post after you read the second paragraph of your post. Thanks.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (201544) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Fri Mar 16 13:58:11 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 15 21:12:24 2007. She should've or maybe charged w/some sorta homicide charges. |
|
|
| (201551) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 14:46:06 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 10:52:42 2007. I know what my point is. What's yours? |
|
|
| (201552) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 14:47:30 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Grand Concourse on Fri Mar 16 13:58:11 2007. Had this happened last week - had she been a republican - the left-leaners would be screaming Nazi-thai and Nazi-that at the top of their lungs. |
|
|
| (201554) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri Mar 16 14:55:03 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 14:47:30 2007. If she were a republican, the right-leaners would have made her a hero for dealing forcefully with those terrorist branch davidians...your pal Fred |
|
|
| (201555) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Fri Mar 16 14:56:06 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Broadway Lion on Fri Mar 16 10:43:47 2007. I know she will end $$$ billions in faith based initiatives and put the money to good use helping the tens of thousands of brain damaged and PTSD kids from the Iraq farce. |
|
|
| (201556) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Fri Mar 16 14:57:11 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Broadway Lion on Fri Mar 16 10:49:06 2007. No more aircraft carriers . |
|
|
| (201557) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Fri Mar 16 15:01:35 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Broadway Lion on Fri Mar 16 10:49:06 2007. I will shortly have an associates egree. that won't even qualify me for a janitor's job at lockheed martin. Nazis want to destroy the "boom" generation. You don't care, you belong to a political club which gets billions =in faith based initiative dollar$. She will STYOP THAT SHIT and use the money where it will do some good. |
|
|
| (201559) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Fri Mar 16 15:05:01 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Broadway Lion on Fri Mar 16 10:49:06 2007. Look at how much empathy christianity has for those whose lives have been ruined by the nazis. I'm glad I left |
|
|
| (201573) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Fri Mar 16 15:32:01 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Broadway Lion on Fri Mar 16 10:49:06 2007. War plants produce nothing which benefit the overall economy. If we are in an era of globalism, it is then the job of the UN to police the world. The US economy should not be expected to fund international secuity. Look at the far east. we are defending Japan an, Taiwan, and South Korea. What benefit do those countries have for the average American. Corporate benefits do not count. If we got out of the Far East, North Korea would cease to be a problem. China would crush them in 24 hours. (actually, kim jong il would get a phone call from Beijing to stanbd down and retire.) |
|
|
| (201584) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Fri Mar 16 15:47:29 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 10:52:42 2007. New presidents always replace most political appointees (including US attorneys) upon taking office. Existing Presidents rarely replace incumbent US attorneys -- because, once appointed, they are supposed to be able to enforce the law without political interference. THIS is what Bush is ignoring -- the independnce of US attorneys once appointed. |
|
|
| (201650) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 17:17:21 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Fred G on Fri Mar 16 14:55:03 2007. Non-sense! The Branch Davidians were unmolested under the previous Republican Administration. One has to wonder what they did that so threatened the democrats that they were all murdered. |
|
|
| (201651) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Fri Mar 16 17:18:24 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 17:17:21 2007. are you talking about david koreish and waco ??i do not like ''reno'' to this day on that !! |
|
|
| (201652) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 17:19:51 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by italianstallion on Fri Mar 16 15:47:29 2007. Bull Shit. What was done was not illegal. I wish the current administration would show some balls and tell Harry Reid, Pelosi and her mafia goons to fuck off. |
|
|
| (201654) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Fri Mar 16 17:23:21 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 17:19:51 2007. Bullshit to you baby.So in your warped right-wing view, only illegal things are wrong? What ever happened to ethics? |
|
|
| (201675) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 17:38:07 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by italianstallion on Fri Mar 16 17:23:21 2007. hhahahahah. You are such a schmuck supporting democrats and then talking about ethics. What's ethical about Nancy Pelosi and the criminal-appointees she's been naming and even those she's been stopped from naming. |
|
|
| (201714) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Fri Mar 16 19:13:57 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 17:38:07 2007. You, as usual, change the subject and resort to gratuitous name-calling when you don't have an answer.Pray tell me what is wrong with having US attorneys independent of political influence? |
|
|
| (201715) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 19:22:09 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by italianstallion on Fri Mar 16 19:13:57 2007. Name calling? Oh, I see, like you referring to me as "baby"? Is that what you're talking about?As for your question, though. There is nothing wrong with the US attorneys being free of politics. The fact is that the position IS a political appointment - and that's the way it's been. I'd have had some respect for your opinion, though, if you thought it was wrong when Reno fired 92 of 93 for the Clintonistas. Ever wonder who #93 was or why he wasn't fired. Look it up. |
|
|
| (201737) | |
Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President? |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Fri Mar 16 20:03:41 2007, in response to Re: Could Bill Clinton Be Vice President?, posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 19:22:09 2007. Is this the same as the "Up and Down vote" arguement where we're supposed to give Bushes nominee's all Up votes, but Clinton's still waiting for is to be voted on?Or is this like, you investgated Tom Delay, and jailed Cunningham, and you refused to take down that democrat, you're job is toast boy. Signed, Lord Rove. 1992 was when Clinton got into office. That means he gutted corrupt US Attorneys from the Bush administration. The scandal here, besides the lock-step emails, and the reason they picked who they did, is this was MID-TERM! Big difference. I think I rectified all the spin and misinformation in your post. I give your report a D- with B- for effort. |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 5 |
||