|
|
| Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line (245678) | |
 |
|
| Home > BusChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 9 |
||
|
| (246000) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 23 16:31:19 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Osmosis Jones on Sat Oct 22 14:50:44 2011. I find her unattractive for solely that reason. |
|
|
| (246001) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 23 16:32:33 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by BusMgr on Sun Oct 23 14:52:45 2011. It was not custom it was actual law. |
|
|
| (246002) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 23 16:32:51 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 23 16:32:33 2011. Or rather policy, not necessarily law (but in some cases yes). |
|
|
| (246004) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Sun Oct 23 16:39:24 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 23 16:31:19 2011. I can't get over the baldness either, but she has a great body. |
|
|
| (246005) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by hank eisenstein on Sun Oct 23 16:53:40 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 23 16:27:22 2011. Which translates to 'Primarily for procreation'. |
|
|
| (246006) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Sun Oct 23 17:25:36 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by G1Ravage on Sun Oct 23 05:00:09 2011. "'The women are in the back because the seats face forward, and the men can't be staring at women like that.'Oh that's just ridiculous..." It's the truth. It might be their OTT practice, but the truth is that in the vast majority of circumstances in which a man looks at a woman, there is nothing remotely sexual going on. To suggest otherwise is offensive on all sorts of levels. |
|
|
| (246007) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 23 17:26:01 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Oct 19 23:59:20 2011. torture and kill helpless chickens before Yom KippurAre you a vegetarian? If not, STFU. |
|
|
| (246008) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 23 17:27:13 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Osmosis Jones on Sun Oct 23 16:39:24 2011. IAWTP |
|
|
| (246009) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by 5301 Fishbowl on Sun Oct 23 18:09:38 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Kahlua on Sat Oct 22 20:57:50 2011. No problem! In New Jersey it's only available in Phillipsburg, but in Pa. it's available anywhere in Northampton and Lehigh counties... |
|
|
| (246014) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin station on Sun Oct 23 20:12:56 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by BrooklynBus on Fri Oct 21 15:40:12 2011. Your post is another great example of why you are almost always wrong. |
|
|
| (246015) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin station on Sun Oct 23 20:14:33 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 23 16:25:38 2011. Correct. BrooklynBus is not rational. Why does anyone take his posts even remotely seriously? |
|
|
| (246016) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin station on Sun Oct 23 20:16:39 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Kahlua on Fri Oct 21 18:27:33 2011. All normal Coke is kosher year round. |
|
|
| (246018) | |
Re: Occupy the B110! |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Sun Oct 23 20:59:13 2011, in response to Re: Occupy the B110!, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Sun Oct 23 06:45:52 2011. But doesn't everyone board through the front of the bus now? In that case the men still see the women boarding. |
|
|
| (246019) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Sun Oct 23 21:00:48 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Terrapin station on Sun Oct 23 20:12:56 2011. Don't you ever have anything meaningful to say? Why do you waste everyone's time? I know. Because you have nothing better to do. |
|
|
| (246020) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by LRG5784 on Sun Oct 23 22:22:39 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by BrooklynBus on Sun Oct 23 21:00:48 2011. Don't you ever have anything meaningful to say?Probably not. Why do you waste everyone's time? Waste who's time? The only one's time he's wasting is his own. Because you have nothing better to do BINGO! |
|
|
| (246021) | |
Shaving heads |
|
|
Posted by davidy on Sun Oct 23 22:39:21 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by mtk52983 on Sat Oct 22 13:42:06 2011. You're statement is TOTALLY backwards. A married woman wears a wig or someother type of covering like a hat or kerchief to cover her own hair, as is the jewish custom, Not because the head is bald. SOME woman just find it more comfortable to shave the head bald because they are wearing a wig all day anyway. |
|
|
| (246023) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 23 22:50:55 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by BrooklynBus on Sun Oct 23 21:00:48 2011. Except that your post is wrong. |
|
|
| (246026) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by davidy on Sun Oct 23 23:53:27 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by hank eisenstein on Sun Oct 23 16:53:40 2011. Not at all, if you would know the jewish laws, it refers to instances like using a condom, or other means of waste. But having relations with your wife even if she is not ovulating is 100% permitted. |
|
|
| (246027) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by davidy on Mon Oct 24 00:00:13 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by JAzumah on Fri Oct 21 13:08:29 2011. Do you believe every news atricle that is published? |
|
|
| (246028) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Mon Oct 24 00:14:27 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by davidy on Sun Oct 23 23:53:27 2011. So you personally view condoms as wasteful? |
|
|
| (246029) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 00:55:15 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 23 22:50:55 2011. Yep. Thanks. |
|
|
| (246030) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 00:56:35 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by BrooklynBus on Sun Oct 23 21:00:48 2011. Your post is wrong. Tens of thousands of people would tell you the same thing. So yes, it was meaningful. It was telling you that you are wrong and that it was yet another example of why your posts are almost always wrong. You need to accept the fact that you are almost always wrong. |
|
|
| (246031) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 00:58:11 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Sat Oct 22 12:21:58 2011. Excellent post. BrooklynBus is almost always wrong and is pretty much a complete moron. Same with several others in this thread. |
|
|
| (246032) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 00:58:50 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Osmosis Jones on Sat Oct 22 14:45:40 2011. No it's not. |
|
|
| (246033) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 00:59:03 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Edwards! on Fri Oct 21 16:22:31 2011. Edwards is wrong as usual. Just like BrooklynBus. |
|
|
| (246034) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:00:11 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by mtk52983 on Sun Oct 23 06:53:34 2011. You'd be wrong. |
|
|
| (246035) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:00:21 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by BrooklynBus on Sun Oct 23 11:48:28 2011. You're wrong too. |
|
|
| (246036) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:00:34 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 23 16:32:51 2011. +1 |
|
|
| (246037) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:01:05 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by mtk52983 on Sat Oct 22 13:42:06 2011. You're completely wrong. Wow. |
|
|
| (246038) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:01:55 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by hank eisenstein on Sun Oct 23 16:53:40 2011. Wrong, Hank Eisenstein. Why do you continue to post about things you know nothing about? |
|
|
| (246040) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:05:25 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by BrooklynBus on Fri Oct 21 10:51:09 2011. It is illegal fo tell anyone on a public bus to sit in the back. The women sit in the back because they have been brainwashed to feel inferior. Incorrect. Why are you always wrong? I know that Orthodox Judaism believes that religious law is higher than laws set by man so they are doing nothing wrong. Not everyone else agrees. But since Orthodox Jews are very intolerant of what anyone else thinks, even non-Orthodox Jews, because everyone else is inferior to them, you don't care and will continue to do practice the same barbaric practices you have been always doing like the torturing of chickens by swinging them over your heads until they die. Even Conservative Judaism is against that. No, it's very clear that you don't know anything. You're completely wrong on all accounts. Might you be a self-hating Jew? Or are you just really really really really ignorant and stupid and unaware of this thing called GOOGLE and also "a local Orthodox rabbi"? |
|
|
| (246041) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:06:26 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by G1Ravage on Sun Oct 23 05:08:13 2011. "Ultra" doesn't play a part. |
|
|
| (246042) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:07:25 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Sun Oct 23 17:25:36 2011. but the truth is that in the vast majority of circumstances in which a man looks at a woman, there is nothing remotely sexual going on. No one said otherwise, nor does this tradition/practice contradict that. |
|
|
| (246043) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:08:58 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by G1Ravage on Sat Oct 22 04:17:39 2011. Just like it's custom that during a marriage ceremony, the groom's family sits on one side, and the bride's family on the other. That may be a custom, but I don't think it is very universal. I've never seen it done, AFAIK. More often, at religious weddings, the men will sit on one side and the women on the other. |
|
|
| (246044) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:10:32 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Sat Oct 22 12:26:33 2011. Notice how BrooklynBus failed to reply to this post where he was majorly pwn3d point by point.BrooklynBus is nothing but a self-hating Jew it seems, expressing a bunch of antisemitic garbage. |
|
|
| (246045) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:10:54 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 23 16:18:35 2011. IAWTP |
|
|
| (246047) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:11:36 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by mtk52983 on Sat Oct 22 14:05:04 2011. Has nothing to do with being intolerant. I suggest you read up on the issue before trying to defame Orthodox Jews like that. |
|
|
| (246048) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:13:24 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Fri Oct 21 00:59:44 2011. It isn't illegal for a group of people to voluntarily sit on a bus in a certain way. Notice how only one person even remotely tried to seriously address this. The rest posted antisemitic garbage. |
|
|
| (246049) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:15:04 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by BrooklynBus on Thu Oct 20 17:06:13 2011. Because what they are doing has always been illegal. Right. And that's why it has gone on for so long. You're completely clueless. Might this have something to do why, by your own admission, the MTA will have nothing to do with you? Why would they want to deal with a clueless person such as yourself? |
|
|
| (246050) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by JAzumah on Mon Oct 24 01:16:29 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by davidy on Mon Oct 24 00:00:13 2011. From the article:A male photographer found it difficult to visit the back of the bus, filled with Hasidic riders loaded down with packages and the scent of freshly baked bread before the Jewish holiday Shemini Atzeret. The bus driver told him that only women were allowed there. So, a NYT photographer was told by the bus driver that only women are allowed back there. Are you saying that the New York Times fabricated this exchange? |
|
|
| (246051) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:16:36 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Bill from Maspeth on Wed Oct 19 19:24:18 2011. No. |
|
|
| (246052) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:17:22 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Fri Oct 21 19:29:19 2011. That would be highly disrespectful, regardless of the potential for pics. |
|
|
| (246054) | |
Joe Saitta agrees with antisemitic sentiments |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:18:38 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Joe Saitta on Thu Oct 20 00:03:19 2011. See here: Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line (245747) |
|
|
| (246055) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:19:23 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by BrooklynBus on Thu Oct 20 15:42:47 2011. So you're willing to accept varying degrees of this stuff? What a hypocrite!! |
|
|
| (246056) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:19:50 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by AMoreira81 on Sat Oct 22 12:54:13 2011. Incorrect, AMoreira81. You don't seem to know what you are talking about. |
|
|
| (246057) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:20:01 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 23 17:26:01 2011. +1 |
|
|
| (246058) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:21:20 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Oct 19 23:59:20 2011. I'll tell you what bothers me is that in this day and age Orthodox Judaism still treats women as second class citizens and they have all been brainwashed into accepting it. I'm glad this story was brought to the public's attention. There is no religious law that says women must sit in the back of the bus other than some rabbis decreed it...or torture and kill helpless chickens before Yom Kippur in the name of religious freedom and no City agency would dare to tell them it shouldn't be done. Antisemitic self-hating Jew bullshit. |
|
|
| (246059) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:22:25 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Fri Oct 21 19:30:39 2011. Me too. With a GoPro video camera mounted to your head. |
|
|
| (246060) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by JAzumah on Mon Oct 24 01:22:40 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Fri Oct 21 00:59:44 2011. New York Times articleFrom the article: A male photographer found it difficult to visit the back of the bus, filled with Hasidic riders loaded down with packages and the scent of freshly baked bread before the Jewish holiday Shemini Atzeret. The bus driver told him that only women were allowed there. This is being enforced by some drivers. This makes it "not voluntary". |
|
|
| (246061) | |
Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line |
|
|
Posted by JAzumah on Mon Oct 24 01:24:53 2011, in response to Re: Women ride in back on sex-segregated Brooklyn bus line, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Oct 24 01:15:04 2011. And that's why it has gone on for so long.The city was waiting for an official complaint to do something about it. The fact that illegal things go on for so long usually does not make them legal (except in real estate on occasion). |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 9 |
||