|
|
| Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street (959583) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 5 of 5 |
||
|
| (960852) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jul 27 17:59:19 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by bmtlines on Tue Jul 27 10:54:06 2010. Exactly! Thank you. Take Pride,
|
|
|
| (960880) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Tue Jul 27 19:25:01 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jul 27 10:39:19 2010. Um No. Bad Guys could hide behind it. Cops wanna see what is around them. All the cop needed to do was to stand between Nilet and the machine, arms folded, and smile for the camera.
|
|
|
| (960881) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jul 27 19:25:43 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by Broadway Lion on Tue Jul 27 19:25:01 2010. Um, no. Do you even know what we are talking about? |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (960890) | |
Re: SubChat Exposé (Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Tue Jul 27 19:47:26 2010, in response to Re: SubChat Exposé (Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street), posted by SMAZ on Sun Jul 25 03:14:08 2010. Hahaha....memories...your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (960959) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Tue Jul 27 22:06:02 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jul 27 19:25:43 2010. *I* am a *LION*, and I have followed this thread from the beginning.Yes I *know* what we are talking about. And *I* was telling *you* that no cop wants to hide behind a curtain, for it is obvious that a would be robber would find this situation commodious to say the least. A working officer wants to see every thin in every direction, and if there ever were a reason to prohibit the photography of the innards of an MVM, then the simple expedient for him would be to stand between the photographer and the machine, and to smile for the camera. Yes, *I* know that Nilet was NOT taking a photo when approached, but the officer did not know that. All he had to do was to turn, face Nilet and smile and wave for the camera. By confronting him as he did, he abandoned his post which was to protect the revenue collector, and left him open for a second vector attack. If the were that easy to distract these officers, the MTA would already be broke.
|
|
|
| (960980) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 27 23:49:42 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by Broadway Lion on Tue Jul 27 19:25:01 2010. Exactly |
|
|
| (960987) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Wed Jul 28 00:18:28 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by TheCiskoKid on Tue Jul 27 09:43:39 2010. "I've also heard that it might be your "less than conventional" appearance and your poor hygiene practices that may contribute to your problems. I don't know that to be true since I've never seen you but I discount nothing.I've heard the term "rat-bag skell" used to describe him but like you - I've never seen him |
|
|
| (961002) | |
Re: SubChat Exposé (Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Wed Jul 28 01:38:22 2010, in response to Re: SubChat Exposé (Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street), posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jul 24 02:33:38 2010. Haha, just admit you're the dupe of the plot again. You've been had.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (961017) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jul 28 06:20:04 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by Broadway Lion on Tue Jul 27 22:06:02 2010. I never said anything about a cop hiding behind a curtain. I don't think you are following the discussion. |
|
|
| (961241) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Wed Jul 28 18:14:39 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 25 22:22:49 2010. Have it your way. In light of the sensitive nature of the revenue collection process, I would be fully understanding of why photography of that operation might be limited or not allowed. |
|
|
| (961257) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jul 28 19:09:49 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Wed Jul 28 18:14:39 2010. How would it be enforced? Why aren't armored vehicle pickups and deliveries at banks prohibited from being photographed? What other "processes" that occur in public anywhere in this country are not allowed to be photographed? Why would you allowed a made up rules about photography to stand in this regard but not allow it to stand in other regards? How would you prevent additional made up photography laws that you choose not to fully understand from being enforced? |
|
|
| (961260) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by BMTLines on Wed Jul 28 19:19:52 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Wed Jul 28 18:14:39 2010. FWIW there is no statute on the books prohibiting it.Also the "inner workings" of these machines is not a state secret. Shows like "How its Made" or "Deconstructed" have at one point or another covered things like vending machines, ATMs and even Slot Machines. What a lot of people are fed up with is not only that cops and security guards make up laws, but that they are downright nasty about it as well. As if we are supposed to know and obey double secret law no. 105 that exists only in the mind of Officer Testosterone... By lying so much about the law cops and security guards have virtually lost all of their credibility on this issue. |
|
|
| (961369) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Thu Jul 29 07:38:41 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jul 28 19:09:49 2010. I've never tried photographing an amored truck pickup at a bank, have you?I am not a lawyer, but I could see the possibility of some other statute or something of that nature existing and being able to apply to photographing the MVM revenue collection, while still maintaining that photography on the subway is generally legal, possibly on the grounds that it is an "unauthorized" or "sensitive" area that the public "cannot access." |
|
|
| (961405) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jul 29 09:29:21 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Thu Jul 29 07:38:41 2010. I've never tried photographing an amored truck pickup at a bank, have you? I don't think so. But I have photographed them driving around and parked. I've photographed NYCT Revenue Collection trucks outside of subway stations. But what does that matter if you have or haven't? There's no law that says you can't! I am not a lawyer, but I could see the possibility of some other statute or something of that nature existing and being able to apply to photographing the MVM revenue collection, while still maintaining that photography on the subway is generally legal, possibly on the grounds that it is an "unauthorized" or "sensitive" area that the public "cannot access." Sure you could see it. You could see anything. But what does that have to do with the fact that it's NOT prohibited in any way? Actually, you can't see that prohibition existing since photography of anything from a public area is allowed, even if the subject of the photo is in a restricted area. If someone wants something in a restricted area not to be photographed, the onus is on THEM to block the view of such an item. I can't stress enough that ANYTHING YOU CAN SEE WITH YOUR EYES CAN ALSO BE PHOTOGRAPHED, provided it doesn't violate any other existing laws or rules. So you can't allow people to stand and watch NYCT revenue collection at an MVM but not allow then to photograph it. Take Pride,
|
|
|
| (961515) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by TheCiskoKid on Thu Jul 29 14:18:04 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jul 29 09:29:21 2010. You are wrong! |
|
|
| (961516) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by TheCiskoKid on Thu Jul 29 14:18:34 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jul 28 19:09:49 2010. You are wrong! |
|
|
| (961523) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jul 29 14:36:03 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by TheCiskoKid on Thu Jul 29 14:18:34 2010. This stupid thread's still going . . . ? |
|
|
| (961546) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by bmtlines on Thu Jul 29 15:38:20 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by TheCiskoKid on Thu Jul 29 14:18:04 2010. What exactly is he wrong about? |
|
|
| (961658) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jul 29 20:20:02 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by TheCiskoKid on Thu Jul 29 14:18:04 2010. You are wrong! LOL. What next, a temper-tantrum? Take Pride,
|
|
|
| (961659) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jul 29 20:20:49 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by TheCiskoKid on Thu Jul 29 14:18:34 2010. You are wrong! No, not really. Take Pride,
|
|
|
| (961720) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 29 22:02:35 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by TheCiskoKid on Thu Jul 29 14:18:34 2010. You have no idea how wrong. |
|
|
| (961729) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Jul 29 22:27:28 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by TheCiskoKid on Thu Jul 29 14:18:04 2010. You are correct! |
|
|
| (961753) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by straphanger9 on Thu Jul 29 23:16:30 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by TheCiskoKid on Tue Jul 27 09:43:39 2010. I've also heard that he is combative/defensive when confronted...if that's true I'd venture a guess the cops don't like that... |
|
|
| (961802) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri Jul 30 05:20:11 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by straphanger9 on Thu Jul 29 23:16:30 2010. Lotta hearsay in this thread...rumor mill kinda stuff, accusations and claims yet no proof.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (961807) | |
Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Jul 30 05:59:21 2010, in response to Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by Fred G on Fri Jul 30 05:20:11 2010. What can you expect from morons? |
|
|
|
Page 5 of 5 |
||
