|
|
| Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. (279259) | |
 |
|
| Home > BusChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 5 |
||
|
| (279447) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:08:54 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by SubwaySurf on Mon Jul 22 15:08:07 2013. How old are you? |
|
|
| (279448) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by SubwaySurf on Mon Jul 22 15:23:57 2013, in response to Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by SubwaySurf on Mon Jul 22 15:07:03 2013. TRUE....you are not FORMERS you are FOAMERS that Logan got fed upwith.BTW....I've posted here for over TEN YEARS. You have no business telling me to get lost, little boy/girl. 8-) Peace, Andee |
|
|
| (279450) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:25:00 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 14:59:09 2013. Going back on topic, I hope Prevost fix the way the signs on installed somehow. Hate the way the cross the windshield. |
|
|
| (279451) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by SubwaySurf on Mon Jul 22 15:26:22 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:08:32 2013. TRUE....you are not FORMERS you are FOAMERS that Logan got fed upwith.BTW....I've posted here for over TEN YEARS. You have no business telling me to get lost, little boy/girl. 8-) Peace, Andee |
|
|
| (279452) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:27:33 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by SubwaySurf on Mon Jul 22 15:26:22 2013. Would you shut your mouth already kid? |
|
|
| (279453) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by SubwaySurf on Mon Jul 22 15:28:14 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:27:33 2013. STFU.Peace, Andee |
|
|
| (279457) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Cornell Park on Mon Jul 22 15:40:34 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 14:37:00 2013. 3741 was being towed by MTA. 3548 was not BAE related. |
|
|
| (279459) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by fdny on Mon Jul 22 15:40:49 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jul 22 14:30:42 2013. please stop the duplicate postings...thank u....steve fdny nyc |
|
|
| (279460) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:42:18 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Cornell Park on Mon Jul 22 15:40:34 2013. NYCT forums confirmed that it was a private operator. #3548 was an electrical issue. |
|
|
| (279461) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:44:11 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:42:18 2013. So was #6862, #6853, #4002, #3986,and #3573. |
|
|
| (279463) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 15:45:45 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:01:51 2013. and? |
|
|
| (279465) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 15:46:05 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:02:56 2013. Why are you changing the subject? |
|
|
| (279466) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:47:07 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 15:46:05 2013. Why are you? This was for the new Prevost, not how good the Orion VIIs and C40LFs are. |
|
|
| (279467) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 15:47:08 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:25:00 2013. You need a new hobby |
|
|
| (279468) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:47:59 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 15:47:08 2013. Why don't you get one? |
|
|
| (279469) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Cornell Park on Mon Jul 22 15:48:04 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:42:18 2013. NYCTF says it was a private tow company, so I guess that's true then. My people in LGA depot must have been mistaken when the tow truck hooked the bus.Go look at the photos from the scene of the fire. Do a search on here for 3741. |
|
|
| (279470) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 15:48:05 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:47:07 2013. You mention the Orion VII, dimwit. |
|
|
| (279471) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:52:50 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 15:48:05 2013. Here we go the childish name calling... |
|
|
| (279472) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by CJ on Mon Jul 22 15:53:03 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:47:59 2013. I'm just going to tell you right now. Your on Subchat not NYCTF. The rules around here aren't how should I say really enforced at all, so if you do get into a flame war, well all I can say to you is good luck, cause your going to need it. |
|
|
| (279473) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:57:12 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by CJ on Mon Jul 22 15:53:03 2013. You should tell Gold-12th that. |
|
|
| (279475) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by CJ on Mon Jul 22 16:10:03 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:57:12 2013. He's been on Subchat for years now. I don't need to tell him, he already knows. |
|
|
| (279477) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 16:13:17 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:52:50 2013. I could call you a dumbass. |
|
|
| (279479) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 16:14:54 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 16:13:17 2013. Grow up. |
|
|
| (279503) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Jul 22 16:53:28 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 14:53:20 2013. im sayin..how would you remember that if you are 12 years old,like you said you were?i smell fraudulence. |
|
|
| (279505) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jul 22 16:54:46 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Edwards! on Mon Jul 22 16:53:28 2013. I thought it was obregonmichael who said he was 12 |
|
|
| (279507) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by The silence on Mon Jul 22 16:59:28 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by SubwaySurf on Mon Jul 22 15:28:14 2013. Never though I'd be taking sides with you in an argument... |
|
|
| (279508) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:01:06 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Edwards! on Mon Jul 22 16:53:28 2013. I 9-10 actually. |
|
|
| (279509) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:01:14 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Edwards! on Mon Jul 22 16:53:28 2013. I was 9-10 actually. |
|
|
| (279515) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by SubwaySurf on Mon Jul 22 17:10:14 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by The silence on Mon Jul 22 16:59:28 2013. Hey ya never knowPeace, Andee |
|
|
| (279517) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:10:52 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by SubwaySurf on Mon Jul 22 17:10:14 2013. When you fight the greater of two evils. :) |
|
|
| (279521) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 17:15:23 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:01:06 2013. No wonder you such childish brat and got banned on NYCTF twice. |
|
|
| (279525) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by the Silence on Mon Jul 22 17:27:19 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:10:52 2013. You be quiet... |
|
|
| (279526) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:31:22 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by the Silence on Mon Jul 22 17:27:19 2013. STHU. |
|
|
| (279528) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by CJ on Mon Jul 22 17:34:27 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:31:22 2013. Dude, seriously stop before it's too late. Your biting off far more then you can chew. |
|
|
| (279529) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:35:25 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by CJ on Mon Jul 22 17:34:27 2013. Does this site even have moderators? |
|
|
| (279530) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:35:48 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by CJ on Mon Jul 22 17:34:27 2013. I've seen pretty severe flamewars here before. |
|
|
| (279531) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by CJ on Mon Jul 22 17:44:35 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:35:25 2013. It's not the mods you have to worry about. It's making enemies around here. |
|
|
| (279532) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:45:36 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by CJ on Mon Jul 22 17:44:35 2013. What happened in the past? What were the results? |
|
|
| (279533) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by Gamera on Mon Jul 22 17:46:18 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:35:25 2013. We see you are taking advantage of that quite well |
|
|
| (279534) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:46:23 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by CJ on Mon Jul 22 17:44:35 2013. Already, I'll chill if people stop starting stupid shit with me. |
|
|
| (279535) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:48:16 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by Gamera on Mon Jul 22 17:46:18 2013. How so? I'm arguing with 11 year olds it seems. |
|
|
| (279536) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:48:56 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:46:23 2013. I meant "alright". Boy, I'm really screwing up today... |
|
|
| (279537) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Grand concourse on Mon Jul 22 17:53:40 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 07:53:56 2013. Nassau didn't want to pay the mta to run lib. If anything, till nassau decides they will pay what the mta is owed, they can keep going with whatever private company is willing to put up with them. Of course things can change, but i don't see those buses coming back under the mta umbrella. |
|
|
| (279538) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:56:01 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Grand concourse on Mon Jul 22 17:53:40 2013. There's a reason why the NICE had wrapped the 2011 CNGs instead of repainting them like with the 2009 CNGs. |
|
|
| (279539) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:56:29 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Grand concourse on Mon Jul 22 17:53:40 2013. But, you could be right. |
|
|
| (279540) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by B68 slow poke on Mon Jul 22 18:15:00 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Edwards! on Mon Jul 22 16:53:28 2013. Edwards /hope to catch you here. Aside from this topic. When I was at Trailway bus 18 years working in the terminal at the port authority bus terminal I heard about the over the road drivers talk about [ ROAD BLANK ] Where they would NOT remember going from exit to exit and it would strike a fear in them. Did this ever happen to you in over the road ? |
|
|
| (279547) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by The silence on Mon Jul 22 18:44:37 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:46:23 2013. You're the one starting the stupid shit... |
|
|
| (279548) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 18:45:42 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by The silence on Mon Jul 22 18:44:37 2013. Can we just kill this trend already? |
|
|
| (279550) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Jul 22 18:50:48 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by SubwaySurf on Mon Jul 22 15:26:22 2013. yup...since this place opened..and subtalk before that. he wasnt born yet. |
|
|
| (279552) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by CJ on Mon Jul 22 18:52:14 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:48:16 2013. Nope, your arguing with adults. Most of the users on this site range in age from 20s to 70s.Some rode or even drove buses back when the bus fleet in New York City and across the continent were ruled by Old Looks, Twin Coaches, Macks, and Fishbowls. |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 5 |
||