|
|
| Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. (279259) | |
 |
|
| Home > BusChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 5 of 5 |
||
|
| (279678) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Bill From Maspeth on Tue Jul 23 18:55:33 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 17:11:33 2013. You are too obsessed with this hobby.You are a legend in your own mind. Nobody can tell you you're wrong. Mr. Know it All! |
|
|
| (279679) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 18:59:34 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Bill From Maspeth on Tue Jul 23 18:55:33 2013. A load of shit. |
|
|
| (279686) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Bill From Maspeth on Tue Jul 23 19:05:50 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 18:59:34 2013. Then you wonder why they banned you from NYCTF.As I said to you Friday, the webmaster is not too quick to ban posters from here. But keep it up, you are quickly digging your own grave and Larry WILL catch up to you soon. |
|
|
| (279687) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 19:07:33 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Bill From Maspeth on Tue Jul 23 19:05:50 2013. Why are you not attacking these other people here that are demonizing me? |
|
|
| (279690) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by The silence on Tue Jul 23 19:09:51 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 18:37:04 2013. Umm.. EVERYONE |
|
|
| (279691) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Bill From Maspeth on Tue Jul 23 19:10:29 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 19:07:33 2013. They are just trying to put you in your proper place! |
|
|
| (279692) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 19:11:06 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Bill From Maspeth on Tue Jul 23 19:10:29 2013. Yeah, with troll statements and put downs right? |
|
|
| (279694) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by The silence on Tue Jul 23 19:11:59 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 19:07:33 2013. You have a reputation. You've had it since before the first time Harry kicked you off NYCTF, but now everyone here knows it two. |
|
|
| (279695) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 19:14:41 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by The silence on Tue Jul 23 19:11:59 2013. But not everyone goes to NYCTFourms. Some were kicked out too and come here now, just like me. |
|
|
| (279697) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by The silence on Tue Jul 23 19:18:05 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 19:14:41 2013. Quite a few of us do hang out in both places. If you wanted a real fresh startA. You shouldn't have clued us in to who you are, which was your downfall the last time. And B. you should have kept your posting to a minimum. |
|
|
| (279699) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 19:25:36 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by The silence on Tue Jul 23 19:18:05 2013. Last it I was on the forums, I did try to hide who I was. It worked, for about a month. |
|
|
| (279700) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Bill From Maspeth on Tue Jul 23 19:27:49 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 19:11:06 2013. Your problem is when it's pointed out that you're wrong, you take it as a put down. |
|
|
| (279710) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 21:35:36 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 17:42:59 2013. No, you dont. You been posting non-stop! |
|
|
| (279713) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by MTA T on Tue Jul 23 21:42:37 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 14:01:44 2013. Yes yes very good. |
|
|
|
Page 5 of 5 |
||