|
|
| Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. (279259) | |
 |
|
| Home > BusChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
Page 1 of 5 |
|
|
| (279259) | |
Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Sun Jul 21 11:46:32 2013 Any thoughts on #numbers and depots? I believe the numbers might be #2305-2399,#2490-2694. Depots might be:-Ulmer park -Castleton -Charleston -Meredith -Yukon. |
|
|
| (279260) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Sun Jul 21 11:47:06 2013, in response to Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Sun Jul 21 11:46:32 2013. This is assuming that this is all for NYCTA. |
|
|
| (279261) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Sun Jul 21 11:51:29 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Sun Jul 21 11:47:06 2013. No, really? |
|
|
| (279262) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gotham Bus Co. on Sun Jul 21 12:08:05 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Sun Jul 21 11:47:06 2013. Why? Are some fleet numbers off-limits to Bus Company? |
|
|
| (279263) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Sun Jul 21 12:09:12 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Sun Jul 21 11:51:29 2013. Hey, this is suppose to be a civilized conversation. |
|
|
| (279264) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Sun Jul 21 12:09:56 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gotham Bus Co. on Sun Jul 21 12:08:05 2013. No, it's just that these 300 buses are suppose to be for NYCT only. |
|
|
| (279265) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Sun Jul 21 12:18:16 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Sun Jul 21 12:09:56 2013. Its been stated many times that it is only for NYCT. |
|
|
| (279269) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by r33/r36 mainline on Sun Jul 21 12:32:39 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gotham Bus Co. on Sun Jul 21 12:08:05 2013. None of the express buses in MTA Bus are of retirement age. MTA Bus need any new express buses at the moment. |
|
|
| (279271) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Sun Jul 21 12:45:45 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by r33/r36 mainline on Sun Jul 21 12:32:39 2013. The 7400s over there are close though. by 2014, they'll be 12 (they arrived in 2002). |
|
|
| (279272) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Sun Jul 21 12:45:47 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by r33/r36 mainline on Sun Jul 21 12:32:39 2013. The 7400s over there are close though. by 2014, they'll be 12 (they arrived in 2002). |
|
|
| (279273) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by r33/r36 mainline on Sun Jul 21 12:50:44 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Sun Jul 21 12:45:47 2013. There only a small amount of them left, Besides there only two years older than the oldest of the MTA Bus MCIs. |
|
|
| (279291) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Bill From Maspeth on Sun Jul 21 17:06:27 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Sun Jul 21 12:45:45 2013. How many are there?Only a handful, right? |
|
|
| (279292) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Bill From Maspeth on Sun Jul 21 17:07:30 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Sun Jul 21 12:45:47 2013. You have a habit of hitting the post button twice many, many times. |
|
|
| (279302) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by MTA T on Sun Jul 21 20:30:06 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Sun Jul 21 12:09:12 2013. So that's what NYCTF people were talking about... |
|
|
| (279303) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by MTA T on Sun Jul 21 20:31:10 2013, in response to Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Sun Jul 21 11:46:32 2013. The MTA might just number the newer Prevost much more differently than the 90 test ones... just like those LFS-As (1200-1289 then 5770-5986 then ANOTHER series lol) |
|
|
| (279304) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Bill From Maspeth on Sun Jul 21 20:34:12 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by MTA T on Sun Jul 21 20:31:10 2013. They'll probably number them into a series nobody expects, then all the buffs will have a hissy fit.Same thing goes for the depots they'll be assigned to.........and the re-assignments of older stuff that invariably results. |
|
|
| (279306) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by grand concourse on Sun Jul 21 21:23:52 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Bill From Maspeth on Sun Jul 21 20:34:12 2013. I don't get why it seems they don't want to number anything in the 9700s range. The last ones were those ex QSC RTSs. and the 1300s has been some O5s. What's the deal with numbering the 5400 artics to the 1000s number or the switch of the xd60s from 1000 to 4700s? It's overcomplicating things when they have so many other numbers to choose from.And none of it even includes the numbers freed up when LIB was replaced by NICE. |
|
|
| (279324) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by LRG5784 on Mon Jul 22 04:28:24 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Bill From Maspeth on Sun Jul 21 17:07:30 2013. I was about to say the same thing. |
|
|
| (279327) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 07:53:56 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by grand concourse on Sun Jul 21 21:23:52 2013. Those said Orion Vs have just been retired too. As for LIB, I think the MTA might just avoid that series for now, just in case NICE fails and the MTA re-takes it over. |
|
|
| (279334) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 11:03:58 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by MTA T on Sun Jul 21 20:30:06 2013. So, kiss the following goodbye:1999 MCI D4500s #2040-2139 (Whatever's left). 2000-2001 MCI D4500s #2140-2209,2704-2849. 2002 MCI D4500s #2850-2924, 7423-7428. |
|
|
| (279335) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 11:11:30 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 11:03:58 2013. After this, I can see the 2007 MCI D4500CL #4300-4329 transferring to MTA bus. |
|
|
| (279336) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 11:18:06 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by r33/r36 mainline on Sun Jul 21 12:32:39 2013. MTA bus will get a new fleet of OTR coaches in the near future. They are suppose to get 31. |
|
|
| (279337) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 11:18:46 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by r33/r36 mainline on Sun Jul 21 12:32:39 2013. It's unknown if they'll be Prevosts or more MCI D4500CTs though. |
|
|
| (279350) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 11:50:41 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 11:18:46 2013. For god shakes, the 2002 buses are not in retirement phase. |
|
|
| (279351) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 11:52:41 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 11:50:41 2013. Um, why else is the MTA ordering 300 new OTR buses? Or why did they retire #2185 and #2819 recently? |
|
|
| (279352) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 11:53:21 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 11:50:41 2013. They will be next year when they turn 12. |
|
|
| (279353) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 11:53:52 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 11:50:41 2013. The order will start sometime next year. |
|
|
| (279354) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 11:58:08 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 11:53:52 2013. Are you deaf?This order is only replacing 1998 through 2001 buses. 2002 buses are staying put. |
|
|
| (279358) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 12:17:45 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 11:58:08 2013. Are you blind? There are no more 1998 MCIs. They are all gone and so are most of the 1999 units. |
|
|
| (279360) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 12:20:31 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 12:17:45 2013. Are you annoyed? |
|
|
| (279362) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 12:21:00 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 12:20:31 2013. Quite. |
|
|
| (279364) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 12:22:41 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 12:21:00 2013. then go back to NYC Transit Forums that you so much care about. |
|
|
| (279366) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 12:23:33 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 12:22:41 2013. Those guys are bastards. |
|
|
| (279370) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 12:36:24 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 12:23:33 2013. Like yourself? |
|
|
| (279372) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 12:40:39 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 12:36:24 2013. Can't you calm down? |
|
|
| (279376) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 12:48:40 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 12:40:39 2013. Can you calm down. |
|
|
| (279379) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 12:54:07 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 12:48:40 2013. I'm perfectly content. |
|
|
| (279383) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 13:01:08 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 12:54:07 2013. No, you not |
|
|
| (279384) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 13:02:12 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 13:01:08 2013. "You're not"? |
|
|
| (279385) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 13:07:18 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 11:11:30 2013. NO |
|
|
| (279386) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 13:09:23 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 13:07:18 2013. What do you mean no? At least all the CLs would be at one place. |
|
|
| (279387) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 13:15:31 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 13:09:23 2013. NO |
|
|
| (279388) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 13:20:11 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 13:15:31 2013. YES. |
|
|
| (279389) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 13:22:24 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 13:20:11 2013. Thank god you not in charge of DOB |
|
|
| (279390) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 13:23:42 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 13:22:24 2013. It's quite a shame really. |
|
|
| (279391) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 13:26:17 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 13:23:42 2013. Yeah, you transfer 30 buses to MTA Bus in return of what? |
|
|
| (279392) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 13:28:13 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 13:22:24 2013. I would or retired all of the 1996 RTS's in 2012, all the 1996 Orion Vs in 2011, would of retired all MTA bus, NYCT, and LI bus Orion V CNGs (except the 2004 units) by 2012. Lastly, I would of never ordered any XD40/XD60s nor LFS's. I would of just placed an order for 1,870 Orion VII 3Gs clean diesels. |
|
|
| (279393) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 13:29:41 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 13:22:24 2013. would or retired all of the 1996 RTS's in 2012, all the 1996 Orion Vs in 2011, would of retired all MTA bus, NYCT, and LI bus Orion V CNGs (except the 2004 units) by 2012. Lastly, I would of never ordered any XD40/XD60s nor LFS's. I would of just placed an order for 1,570 Orion VII 3Gs clean diesels. |
|
|
| (279394) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 13:30:20 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 13:26:17 2013. Nothing. You don't need anything back. |
|
|
| (279395) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Wakefield-241st Street on Mon Jul 22 13:31:35 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Mon Jul 22 13:22:24 2013. ROTFLMAO |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 5 |
|