|
|
| Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) (279259) | |
 |
|
| Home > BusChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 5 |
||
|
| (279553) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by B68 slow poke on Mon Jul 22 18:53:39 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by Edwards! on Mon Jul 22 18:50:48 2013. Edwards / see my post further down. |
|
|
| (279554) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 18:54:22 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by CJ on Mon Jul 22 18:52:14 2013. But all those flamewars I've seen from the past, those are really 40-50 year olds? |
|
|
| (279555) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Jul 22 18:57:45 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 15:08:54 2013. now we see what LOGAN was talking about.dont worry,dude..your almost there.. |
|
|
| (279556) | |
Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.) |
|
|
Posted by CJ on Mon Jul 22 19:00:38 2013, in response to Re: Wonderful....(WAS: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts.), posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 18:54:22 2013. That I'm not sure. I gave an estimation of the ages of most around here based on what I've read. A number of users here worked for the MTA.I can say that the reason some of those flame wars happened was because of that goof that was around here as well as a few other "bad apples" that were here too. |
|
|
| (279557) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 19:00:42 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Edwards! on Mon Jul 22 18:57:45 2013. Almost where? |
|
|
| (279559) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Jul 22 19:10:27 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by B68 slow poke on Mon Jul 22 18:15:00 2013. LOL!Tunnel vision, dude.but i did hear some scuttlebutt about the turnpike north 495 to 80. never let my mind wander like that..Always had me a road buddy available[even if i drafted one of the riders]LOL! |
|
|
| (279564) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by B68 slow poke on Mon Jul 22 20:00:03 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Edwards! on Mon Jul 22 19:10:27 2013. A Good operator ! |
|
|
| (279567) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R160A A Train on Mon Jul 22 20:35:32 2013, in response to Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Sun Jul 21 11:46:32 2013. If anything they'll just keep them right with the current numbering scheme and be either 2490 and above or 2500 and above. |
|
|
| (279590) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Cornell Park on Tue Jul 23 02:19:57 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Mon Jul 22 17:56:01 2013. Do you care to tell the reason? Or is it speculation on your part? |
|
|
| (279593) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 04:25:33 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Cornell Park on Tue Jul 23 02:19:57 2013. Those buses were brought with MTA money and built to 2011 MTA specs. |
|
|
| (279613) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Cornell Park on Tue Jul 23 12:35:15 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 04:25:33 2013. And if they were property of MTA they would have left with the MTA. |
|
|
| (279614) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 12:37:36 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Cornell Park on Tue Jul 23 02:19:57 2013. He doesnt know any thing! |
|
|
| (279615) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 12:39:27 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Cornell Park on Tue Jul 23 12:35:15 2013. They (Veolia) are leasing these buses. Jay Walder allowed them to do that. |
|
|
| (279616) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 12:39:55 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 12:37:36 2013. I know a lot more they you idiot. |
|
|
| (279617) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:05:57 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 12:39:55 2013. OH REALLY...http://www.subchat.com/buschat/read.asp?Id=278951 |
|
|
| (279618) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:06:46 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 12:39:27 2013. No, the buses are owned by NASSAU COUNTY. |
|
|
| (279619) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 13:07:33 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:05:57 2013. You really going to bring up this shit again? LOL, you sad little man. |
|
|
| (279620) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 13:08:52 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:06:46 2013. WRONG! The MTA owned the last 80 NG CNGs. Nassau owned the Orion V CNGs, the first 60 Orion VII NG CNGs and the Orion VII 3G CNGs. |
|
|
| (279622) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:19:03 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 13:08:52 2013. Refer to this post, dumbass: http://www.subchat.com/buschat/read.asp?Id=227786. and YOU are so damnWRONG ! |
|
|
| (279623) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:21:55 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 13:07:33 2013. That because you have beenWRONG many times. |
|
|
| (279624) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 13:29:05 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:21:55 2013. Hey genius this is a quote "BedStuyGuy" made in 2011"Ray's statement is actually correct from what I was told. I did a little investigating. MTA holds the option rights to the lot 1760-1839. Orion is currently in talks with the TA to divert the remaining buses from the option to NYCT/MTAB. 1700-1839 were procure under the MTA Regional Bus Operations, unlike any bus in previous years at LIB. 1700-1759 were specifically for LIB. MTA was under the impression that LIB would remain under their umbrella for quite a while. Obviously that changed. But in the Process, the TA purchased 1760-1839 for LIB under an option they held the rights to. So in all actuality 1760-1839 belong to the MTA, but Walder decided that all the NG's would be LIB property anyway. So yes, all the buses at LIB are owned technically by Nassau County, but the latter 1700's and all of the 1800's were given to them by the MTA. So the MTA and the feds funded all of Nassau's Orion VII's. Now that their contract is coming to an end, Orion is hoping MTA will take the remaining options, which will be 3G's if the option is exercised. According to people involved with the matter, MTA will likely end up taking the optional buses. Especially now that LIB will no longer be a concern. It's interesting that people say MTA wasn't doing anything at all for LIB, but if that was the true case, they would have never gotten new buses, and service cuts would have been much worse. It's really too bad that Mangano paints a picture that is 100% false." So it's like I said, the MTA owns atleast 45% of the Orion VIIs over there. |
|
|
| (279625) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 13:29:47 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:21:55 2013. Hey genius this is a quote "BedStuyGuy" made in 2011"Ray's statement is actually correct from what I was told. I did a little investigating. MTA holds the option rights to the lot 1760-1839. Orion is currently in talks with the TA to divert the remaining buses from the option to NYCT/MTAB. 1700-1839 were procure under the MTA Regional Bus Operations, unlike any bus in previous years at LIB. 1700-1759 were specifically for LIB. MTA was under the impression that LIB would remain under their umbrella for quite a while. Obviously that changed. But in the Process, the TA purchased 1760-1839 for LIB under an option they held the rights to. So in all actuality 1760-1839 belong to the MTA, but Walder decided that all the NG's would be LIB property anyway. So yes, all the buses at LIB are owned technically by Nassau County, but the latter 1700's and all of the 1800's were given to them by the MTA. So the MTA and the feds funded all of Nassau's Orion VII's. Now that their contract is coming to an end, Orion is hoping MTA will take the remaining options, which will be 3G's if the option is exercised. According to people involved with the matter, MTA will likely end up taking the optional buses. Especially now that LIB will no longer be a concern. It's interesting that people say MTA wasn't doing anything at all for LIB, but if that was the true case, they would have never gotten new buses, and service cuts would have been much worse. It's really too bad that Mangano paints a picture that is 100% false." So it's like I said, the MTA owns atleast 80 of the Orion VIIs. |
|
|
| (279626) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:33:05 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 13:29:47 2013. Hey dumbass...its been established already, MTA does not own the buses.... NASSAU COUNTY is. You are so fucking late. LATE! |
|
|
| (279627) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:33:39 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 13:29:05 2013. LATE! |
|
|
| (279628) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 13:39:30 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:33:39 2013. It still states stupid. And PS, the only reason why Jay Walder said it was their buses was because if they didn't, there would be another lawsuit made by Nassau county because the MTA had scrapped all the L10G Orion V CNGs (which were Nassau buses). |
|
|
| (279629) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 13:39:39 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:33:39 2013. It still stands stupid. And PS, the only reason why Jay Walder said it was their buses was because if they didn't, there would be another lawsuit made by Nassau county because the MTA had scrapped all the L10G Orion V CNGs (which were Nassau buses). |
|
|
| (279630) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:44:26 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 13:39:39 2013. You fucking idiot. Nassau County owns the buses. Its been established well before you arrive here since Friday. |
|
|
| (279631) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 13:46:53 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:44:26 2013. Are you fucking dense? That's what I just said you fucking tool. |
|
|
| (279632) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 13:50:14 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:44:26 2013. Stop derailing the damn topic. |
|
|
| (279633) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:53:09 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 13:50:14 2013. No, I pointed it out that you areWRONG |
|
|
| (279634) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:54:17 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 13:46:53 2013. You got some issues. |
|
|
| (279636) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 14:01:44 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by CJ on Mon Jul 22 15:53:03 2013. He doesnt need luck, he need to be sent off to a
|
|
|
| (279644) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by CJ on Tue Jul 23 15:23:24 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 13:46:53 2013. Well R62 or (Jgood) or whatever. I tried to help you out around here, but apparently you seem hell bent on causing a flame war and being trouble around here. Well I'm done helping as you are now on your own. |
|
|
| (279645) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by CJ on Tue Jul 23 15:24:33 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:54:17 2013. Your not the last user to say that. Many on the NYCTF have been saying the same ever since he was blocked the first then the second time. |
|
|
| (279646) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by CJ on Tue Jul 23 15:25:58 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 14:01:44 2013. LOL! Many out there will agree with you. |
|
|
| (279653) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 16:44:20 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 13:54:17 2013. Everyone does. |
|
|
| (279654) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 16:51:04 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by CJ on Tue Jul 23 15:23:24 2013. Well, I'm not going to allow him to talk shit about me and look like a bitch. I don't know what's his damage, because I didn't even do anything to him. |
|
|
| (279656) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 16:56:10 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 16:51:04 2013. So you are a bitch, no wonder! |
|
|
| (279657) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 17:01:48 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Gold_12th on Tue Jul 23 16:56:10 2013. You can get a life. You seem to be lacking one. |
|
|
| (279658) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Tue Jul 23 17:05:34 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 17:01:48 2013. you come here and start threads about speculation on the numbers to be used for new bus orders and Gold is the one without a life? |
|
|
| (279659) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 17:11:33 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by mtk52983 on Tue Jul 23 17:05:34 2013. It's a damn hobby. Why the hell are you people so bent out of shape? |
|
|
| (279660) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 17:11:54 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by mtk52983 on Tue Jul 23 17:05:34 2013. This is a transit forum is it not? |
|
|
| (279661) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Bill from Maspeth on Tue Jul 23 17:35:11 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 17:11:54 2013. Let me ask you a question. Why do I keep on seeing so many duplicate back to back posts from you?Why can't you click the post message button once? |
|
|
| (279662) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Bill from Maspeth on Tue Jul 23 17:39:36 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 17:01:48 2013. I think you need to get a life. Ever since you started posting here I've never seen so any posts made in a 24 hour period by one person. |
|
|
| (279663) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 17:41:58 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Bill from Maspeth on Tue Jul 23 17:35:11 2013. My computer is a POS. |
|
|
| (279664) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 17:42:59 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by Bill from Maspeth on Tue Jul 23 17:39:36 2013. I have a life. |
|
|
| (279673) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by The silence on Tue Jul 23 18:30:06 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 17:42:59 2013. Here doesn't count as a life, try again. |
|
|
| (279674) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 18:37:04 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by The silence on Tue Jul 23 18:30:06 2013. According to who? |
|
|
| (279675) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Bill From Maspeth on Tue Jul 23 18:40:58 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 17:41:58 2013. You're overworking it! |
|
|
| (279677) | |
Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts. |
|
|
Posted by Bill From Maspeth on Tue Jul 23 18:47:38 2013, in response to Re: Proposed numbers and depots for the new Prevosts., posted by R62CNG on Tue Jul 23 12:39:27 2013. No they're not.NYCT is not in the business of leasing buses to other systems. We need all the buses we can get for ourselves, including MTA bus. |
|
|
|
Page 4 of 5 |
||