Home · Maps · About

Home > SubChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

(1621391)

view threaded

subway under the ocean

Posted by JRR4 on Fri Jun 16 11:30:41 2023

Biden says he wants to build a railroad crossing across the ocean. I wonder if a subway makes more sense.

Post a New Response

(1621392)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by AlM on Fri Jun 16 12:21:41 2023, in response to subway under the ocean, posted by JRR4 on Fri Jun 16 11:30:41 2023.

If Russia had a more reasonable government, there would probably be good economics in a decently speedy freight and maybe even passenger railroad from Chicago to China and Europe via the Bering Strait. Probably a tunnel under the Strait.



Post a New Response

(1621393)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Train Dude on Fri Jun 16 12:24:34 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by AlM on Fri Jun 16 12:21:41 2023.

And if your grandmother had balls she'd be your grandfather.

Post a New Response

(Sponsored)

iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It

(1621418)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Fri Jun 16 18:28:38 2023, in response to subway under the ocean, posted by JRR4 on Fri Jun 16 11:30:41 2023.

"I wonder if a subway makes more sense."

Next stop: Atlantis!!

Post a New Response

(1621419)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by qveensboro_plaza on Fri Jun 16 18:42:52 2023, in response to subway under the ocean, posted by JRR4 on Fri Jun 16 11:30:41 2023.

My father was a motorman on the Flushing line, and back in the 1950s and 60s, the workforce was overwhelmingly Irish and Irish-American. My dad used to call the Irish-born ones "Hibernians." We were at Main Street one day, probably to go shopping at Gertz, at the time when the TA was lengthening the station to accommodate longer trains. As we were going upstairs, my dad ran into one of his Hibernian co-workers. I asked him what they were building at the end of the station.

The Hibernian said to me, "Why they're building a subway to Ireland!" I must have been maybe 7 or 8 years old and totally believed him.

Post a New Response

(1621426)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Fri Jun 16 20:47:26 2023, in response to subway under the ocean, posted by JRR4 on Fri Jun 16 11:30:41 2023.

Dose Joe Klutz even comprehend what he's saying?

Post a New Response

(1621428)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Andrew Saucci on Fri Jun 16 21:53:03 2023, in response to subway under the ocean, posted by JRR4 on Fri Jun 16 11:30:41 2023.

This is the sort of idea that is born strictly of ideology-- in other words, since jet fuel is bad, and electricity is good, therefore, an electric-powered railroad across the ocean must be a good idea, even if it is more or less impractical today. I can only imagine the cost-- and the cost overruns, not to mention the ongoing maintenance costs of such a venture.

Post a New Response

(1621429)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by The Silence on Fri Jun 16 22:17:45 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by Andrew Saucci on Fri Jun 16 21:53:03 2023.

It's not that "jet fuel is bad" that is the key concern...

it's that there's only so much oil to make it out of. One day that WILL run out. What are we going to do then?

And it's that attitude so many people have of "Well, I won't be around when that happens" that only makes it worse, because it makes people not inclined to do anything, to leave it to the generations who will face the issue instead of fixing it NOW so we don't have to worry.

There is a saying that gets bounded around and the wording shifts, but the idea is the same.

"A society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they shall never sit."

The actions your generations have taken, will have a direct effect on mine and the those that come after. Do you want to leave us with even more of a mess to clean up, or the groundwork for a future where we won't need jet fuel because we'll have something better?

Post a New Response

(1621447)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Avid Reader on Sat Jun 17 12:04:13 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by qveensboro_plaza on Fri Jun 16 18:42:52 2023.

Well if they would have connected the Flushing Line to the local tracks of the near bye LIRR it would have been closer.

Post a New Response

(1621448)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Avid Reader on Sat Jun 17 12:24:25 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by The Silence on Fri Jun 16 22:17:45 2023.


It's not that "jet fuel is bad" that is the key concern...

it's that there's only so much oil to make it out of. One day that WILL run out. What are we going to do then?






Production
Jet fuel is a mixture of various hydrocarbons. The range of their sizes (molecular weights or carbon numbers) is restricted by the requirements for the product, for example, freezing point or smoke point. Jet fuels are sometimes classified as kerosene or naphtha-type. Kerosene-type fuels include Jet A, Jet A-1, JP-5 and JP-8. Naphtha-type jet fuels, sometimes referred to as "wide-cut" jet fuel, include Jet B and JP-4.

"Drop-in" biofuels are biofuels that are completely interchangeable with conventional fuels. Deriving "drop-in" jet fuel from bio-based sources is ASTM approved via two routes. ASTM has also found it safe to blend in 50% SPK into regular jet fuels.[40][22] Only tests have been done so far with blending in synthetic paraffinic kerosene (SPK) in considerably higher concentrations.[41]

HEFA-SPK
Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids Synthetic Paraffinic Kerosine (HEFA-SPK) is a specific type of hydrotreated vegetable oil fuel.[2] As of 2020 this was the only mature technology.[15][2] HEFA-SPK fuel is considered to be a leading alternative replacement for conventional jet fuel by the CAA.[42] HEFA-SPK was approved by Altair Engineering for use in 2011.[43] HEFA-SPK is produced by the deoxygenation and hydroprocessing of the feedstock fatty acids of algae, jatropha, and camelina.[44]
Bio-SPK
This fuel uses oil that is extracted from plant sources such as jatropha, algae, tallows, waste oils, babassu, and Camelina to produce synthetic paraffinic kerosene (bio-SPK) by cracking and hydroprocessing. Using algae to make jet fuel remains an emerging technology. Companies working on algae jet fuel include Solazyme, Honeywell UOP, Solena, Sapphire Energy, Imperium Renewables, and Aquaflow Bionomic Corporation. Universities working on algae jet fuel are Arizona State University and Cranfield University. Major investors for algae based SPK research are Boeing, Honeywell/UOP, Air New Zealand, Continental Airlines, Japan Airlines, and General Electric.[citation needed]
FT-SPK
Another route involves processing solid biomass using pyrolysis to produce oil or gasification to produce a syngas that is processed into FT SPK (Fischer–Tropsch Synthetic Paraffinic Kerosene).[citation needed]
ATJ-SPK
Alcohol-to-jet (ATJ) pathway takes alcohols such as ethanol or butanol and de-oxygenates and processes them into jet fuels.[45] Companies such as LanzaTech have created ATJ-SPK from CO2 in flue gases.[46] The ethanol is produced from CO in the flue gases using microbes such as Clostridium autoethanogenum. In 2016 LanzaTech demonstrated its technology at Pilot scale in NZ –using Industrial waste gases from the steel industry as a feedstock for its microbial fermentation.[47][48][49] Gevo developed technology to retrofit existing ethanol plants to produce isobutanol.[50] Alcohol-to-Jet Synthetic Paraffinic Kerosene (ATJ-SPK) is a proven pathway to deliver a bio-based, low-carbon option to travelers.[citation needed]
Future production routes
Systems that use synthetic biology to create hydro-carbons are under development.
The SUN-to-LIQUID project is examining Fischer-Tropsch hydro-carbon fuels (solar kerosine) through the use of a solar reactor.[51][52][53]
Alder Fuels raw material is waste from forestry and agriculture. This is mainly structural polymers cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. They are processed via pyrolysis. The result is condensed into greencrude, a hydrocarbon-rich liquid, which is turned into fuel in refineries.[54]
Piston engines
Small piston engines can be modified to burn ethanol.[55] Swift Fuel, a biofuel alternative to avgas, was approved as a test fuel by ASTM International in December 2009.[56][57]
Technical challenges
Nitrile-based rubber materials expand in the presence of aromatic compounds found in conventional petroleum fuel. Pure biofuels that aren't mixed with petroleum and don't contain paraffin-based additives may cause rubber seals and hoses to shrink.[58] Synthetic rubber substitutes that are not adversely affected by biofuels, such as Viton, for seals and hoses are available.[59] The United States Air Force found harmful bacteria and fungi in their biofueled aircraft, and use pasteurization to disinfect t

Post a New Response

(1621449)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Avid Reader on Sat Jun 17 12:26:27 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by Avid Reader on Sat Jun 17 12:24:25 2023.

Refueling an Airbus A320 with biofuel



Post a New Response

(1621455)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jun 17 16:03:33 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by The Silence on Fri Jun 16 22:17:45 2023.

We’ll never run out of oil. This is irrelevant. We can make synthetic organic fuels from coal, or biomass. It might be more expensive, but the option is there. Germany did it during World War II because they didn’t have enough oil.

It is not at all about “running out of oil,” it’s about the fact that the molecular waste* produced by using organic fuels have negative effects and ought to be avoided.

The rest of your post is just “OK Boomer” claptrap.

*cf. “nuclear waste.”

Post a New Response

(1621456)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jun 17 16:14:51 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by Andrew Saucci on Fri Jun 16 21:53:03 2023.

A man with a speech impediment skips one monosyllabic word and people decide that he wanted to build a tunnel under the Indian Ocean, the world’s bronze-medal ocean.

Nobody with any practical sense wants to build a transoceanic tunnel, and it has nothing to do with climate change.

Post a New Response

(1621457)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Sat Jun 17 19:29:23 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jun 17 16:03:33 2023.

Technically, he's not a "boomer" (born before 1946)

Post a New Response

(1621458)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sat Jun 17 19:57:52 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by FYBklyn1959 on Sat Jun 17 19:29:23 2023.

The Silent Generation.

Post a New Response

(1621459)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jun 17 20:10:36 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by FYBklyn1959 on Sat Jun 17 19:29:23 2023.

I was referring to the post I was responding to. It’s generation war shit. Commonly reflected by the phrase “OK boomer.”

Post a New Response

(1621461)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by AlM on Sat Jun 17 20:35:06 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by Andrew Saucci on Fri Jun 16 21:53:03 2023.

This is the sort of idea that is born strictly of ideology

This is an "idea" neither Biden nor anyone else who is sensible has ever had. He misspoke.



Post a New Response

(1621484)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Alan Follett on Sun Jun 18 14:54:03 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Fri Jun 16 20:47:26 2023.

In this case, he misspoke. It’s likely that he was referring to a project to build a railroad /to/ the Indian Ocean, from some point in Africa. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-ocean-train/

Post a New Response

(1621485)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Jun 18 16:35:13 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by Alan Follett on Sun Jun 18 14:54:03 2023.

Lol Snopes, acting as Biden's personal spin doctor.

Post a New Response

(1621486)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Jun 18 16:36:56 2023, in response to subway under the ocean, posted by JRR4 on Fri Jun 16 11:30:41 2023.

Wow, a subway under the earth's mantle. Got to figure out how to counteract the pressure differentials and avoid volcanic hotspots . . .

Post a New Response

(1621491)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Sun Jun 18 19:58:23 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Jun 18 16:36:56 2023.

Sounds like great $$$ for the sandhogs. If ever there was a long term job. that would be it!

Post a New Response

(1621492)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by JRR4 on Sun Jun 18 20:28:35 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by Alan Follett on Sun Jun 18 14:54:03 2023.

Hes demented. Poor guy.


Post a New Response

(1621493)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jun 18 20:46:46 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by JRR4 on Sun Jun 18 20:28:35 2023.

LOL!

Post a New Response

(1621494)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by AlM on Sun Jun 18 20:50:57 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by JRR4 on Sun Jun 18 20:28:35 2023.

So demented that he out-negotiated Kevin McCarthy.



Post a New Response

(1621497)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jun 18 21:24:17 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by Alan Follett on Sun Jun 18 14:54:03 2023.

Biden misspoke? The devil you say. Who would expect thst clown to ever mis-speak

Post a New Response

(1621499)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by ntrainride on Sun Jun 18 22:20:33 2023, in response to subway under the ocean, posted by JRR4 on Fri Jun 16 11:30:41 2023.

sure. why not? dream big.

at the freeking very least, four hour hoboken to san francisco via, as norman spinrad described 'em in stand on zanzibar:

vacuum accelera tubes.

ideal would be underground. sealed vacuum tubes. 2,000 mph.

Post a New Response

(1621501)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Jun 18 22:30:13 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by ntrainride on Sun Jun 18 22:20:33 2023.

Been hearing about that for as long as I've been hearing about maglev, or even 160 mph on the NEC with Budd Metroliners.

Post a New Response

(1621503)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by ntrainride on Sun Jun 18 22:51:43 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Jun 18 22:30:13 2023.

would need extremely advanced fusion powered "dumb" autonomous robotic boring machines. with them, the system could probably be true ruler-straight "air line". just for the hell of it.

add stops at pittsburgh, indianapolis, kansas city and denver.

Post a New Response

(1621506)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by ntrainride on Sun Jun 18 23:21:22 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jun 17 16:14:51 2023.

yet, the notion of flying across the oceans in mechanical boxes seems... anachronistic. i will never do it. maybe a tramp steamer, but since i have no desire to see any other country, it's a moot point.

but an undersea railroad? yeah, that i would try.

Post a New Response

(1621507)

view threaded

Re: Subway under the ocean

Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jun 19 00:45:26 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by ntrainride on Sun Jun 18 22:51:43 2023.

As far as the Metroliner goes, did you see this post I made twelve years ago? Talk about broken promises.

Post a New Response

(1621517)

view threaded

Re: Subway under the ocean

Posted by TransitChuckG on Mon Jun 19 04:38:01 2023, in response to Re: Subway under the ocean, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jun 19 00:45:26 2023.

Correct.

Post a New Response

(1621527)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Catfish 44 on Mon Jun 19 12:15:10 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jun 17 16:03:33 2023.

💥💥💥💥💥

Post a New Response

(1621531)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by chicagoMotorman on Mon Jun 19 14:03:36 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by Train Dude on Fri Jun 16 12:24:34 2023.

LMAO

Post a New Response

(1621548)

view threaded

Re: Subway under the ocean

Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jun 19 20:50:01 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by The Silence on Fri Jun 16 22:17:45 2023.

it's that there's only so much oil to make it out of. One day that WILL run out

How do you know?

Been hearing doomsday prophecies like that for ages. Evidence is emerging that oil is made by natural geologic processes, not from "fossils".

Post a New Response

(1621549)

view threaded

Re: Subway under the ocean

Posted by ntrainride on Mon Jun 19 21:15:59 2023, in response to Re: Subway under the ocean, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jun 19 00:45:26 2023.

just read it. good post.

Post a New Response

(1621553)

view threaded

Re: Subway under the ocean

Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jun 20 01:28:06 2023, in response to Re: Subway under the ocean, posted by ntrainride on Mon Jun 19 21:15:59 2023.

Sad story, though.

Like I said then, if they had got it up to 160 mph back then, it would have been the fastest train in the world for its time.

Post a New Response

(1621612)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Wed Jun 21 08:51:42 2023, in response to Re: subway under the ocean, posted by AlM on Fri Jun 16 12:21:41 2023.

Spider-Pig is all for the US going into debt to China to join the belt and road.

Post a New Response

(1621645)

view threaded

Re: subway under the ocean

Posted by Handbrake on Wed Jun 21 18:55:41 2023, in response to subway under the ocean, posted by JRR4 on Fri Jun 16 11:30:41 2023.

A practical idea once the North and South American continents drift back together with all other continents at some time over the next five Billion years.

https://opentextbc.ca/geology/chapter/18-1-the-topography-of-the-sea-floor/

https://www.insightsonindia.com/world-geography/physical-geography-of-the-world/oceanography/bottom-relief-features/bottom-reliefs-of-the-atlantic-ocean/

Post a New Response


[ Return to the Message Index ]