|
|
| SubChat Exposé (Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street) (959675) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
SubChat Exposé (Re: Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street) |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Fri Jul 23 20:29:00 2010, in response to Encounter With Security Guard At 23rd Street, posted by Nilet on Fri Jul 23 15:32:25 2010.  I normally don't post about anti-photography nuts on SubChat because many SubChatters just aren't mature enough to handle such posts. I made one exception in this case to help demonstrate why I have such a policy.Take, for example, Chris R16/R2730, one of the repeat offenders. In response to my post, he implied that it was my fault; I look wrong and it never happens to him, so it must be me that's responsible. In response to a post by Harry P, however, he placed the blame squarely on the responsible party, namely the employee who insisted that photography was somehow illegal. The responses to Harry P's post were all along a similar vein; expressing support, and noting that the employee was in the wrong. The responses to my post, largely from Chris, Olog, and Train Dude, ranged from calling me responsible, insisting I'd made it up, to suggesting that photography is actually illegal in all or part of NYCT. Olog and Train Dude both insisted that I caused the incident, that I broke the rules, that I did something wrong. They didn't say the same things in response to Harry's post. Except my post is Harry's post. Literally. Copied and pasted. Only the job titles and locations were changed. Security guard for maintenance worker, C train for 52 trolley, 23rd Street for South Hills Junction, afternoon for morning. Otherwise, it is the exact same post. As this demonstrates, people such as Chris, Olog, and Train Dude don't actually read posts, let alone put any thought into the words they type in response. They read only the title, see that my name is at the top, and respond with mindless drivel spewed out of arbitrary assumptions and ingrained double standards. Even internal consistency is thrown aside as these individuals leap to pursue a mindless vendetta against some random guy on the internet that none of them have ever actually met, shrieking mindless insults in the process. I can only hope that this behaviour ceases once the aforementioned individuals have received psychiatric treatment. This is why I don't normally mention such incidents in this particular forum. |
|
|
|