Home · Maps · About

Home > SubChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: How Railroad Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash

Posted by steamdriven on Sat Feb 7 23:07:03 2015, in response to Re: How Railroad Could Have Avoided / Ameliorated Fiery Crash, posted by AlM on Sat Feb 7 16:54:34 2015.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
That's bosh. I can remember being on PCC's when the e-brake buzzer sounded and we slid into cars crossing the tracks. Nobody on the train went flying forward. Maybe there were not enough lawyers in those days.

3 ingredients needed to provide better braking.
Pick a better e-brake rate, 3.2mph/sec is pathetic.
Distinctive buzzer sounds, then e-brake rate ramps up (within 1/2 second)
Law changed to disallow or severely cap damages for e-brake application injuries. Passengers are still fully covered for fire, smoke, train-to-train impact etc, but "poor me I went flying because I wasn't holding a pole" gets a token amount or zero. It's possible that a standing 300# individual with their hands busy feeding their pie inlet will act as a low-speed missile, but how many such people are there standing in the commuter rail aisles?


Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]