|
|
| Re: Schmuck Schumer (1305717) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||
|
| (1305855) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 17:10:48 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Aug 4 17:05:28 2015. He's our Senator.And now, the obligatory "you're willing to believe something that even the person who brought it up won't stand behind?" No surprise that the Post would print it, but you're not supposed to print anything without a quotable quote or a smoking gun. But then Rupert never needed facts. |
|
|
| (1305856) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Aug 4 17:23:35 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Aug 4 17:05:28 2015. Schmucky Schumer always talks up Amtrak but won't ever ride it. |
|
|
| (1305857) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Tue Aug 4 17:30:32 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Aug 4 17:23:35 2015. Which is better, a guy who talks up Amtrak or a guy who's bent on destroying it? |
|
|
| (1305858) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer plans for another war |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Tue Aug 4 17:30:32 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 17:10:48 2015. The Senator who is always trying to push the draft is going to blindly back a deal that guarantees a future war?Say it ain't so! |
|
|
| (1305862) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer plans for another war |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 17:50:37 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer plans for another war, posted by orange blossom special on Tue Aug 4 17:30:32 2015. Nice to know that hearsay equals truth. |
|
|
| (1305869) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer plans for another war |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Aug 4 18:23:45 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer plans for another war, posted by orange blossom special on Tue Aug 4 17:30:32 2015. Charlie Rangel has openly called for a reinstatement of the draft. At least he seeved. |
|
|
| (1305870) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Aug 4 18:24:54 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Aug 4 17:05:28 2015. Of course he does except for the Jew part. |
|
|
| (1305871) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Aug 4 18:26:10 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by Dave on Tue Aug 4 16:50:18 2015. He don't no english to good |
|
|
| (1305874) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer plans for another war |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Aug 4 18:46:16 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer plans for another war, posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Aug 4 18:23:45 2015. Correction: SERVED |
|
|
| (1305890) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer plans for another war |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Aug 4 20:52:46 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer plans for another war, posted by orange blossom special on Tue Aug 4 17:30:32 2015. Never mind puts Israel in mortal danger. |
|
|
| (1305897) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer plans for another war |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Aug 4 21:03:45 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer plans for another war, posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Aug 4 18:23:45 2015. What did he serve? |
|
|
| (1305898) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Aug 4 21:14:17 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 17:10:48 2015. Dick Durbin and Mark Kirk are my senators and I don't like either one of them. |
|
|
| (1305901) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by TerrapIN StatiON on Tue Aug 4 21:30:19 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by Mitch45 on Tue Aug 4 15:50:12 2015. WTF is wrong with you? Why do you often mention this? And whenever it is mentioned, why does it always seem to come from you? What is your fascination with this? Are you racist? |
|
|
| (1305905) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer plans for another war |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Aug 4 21:40:26 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer plans for another war, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Aug 4 21:03:45 2015. He enlisted in the Army and served in Korea where he earnehed a Purple Heart and Bronze Star. |
|
|
| (1305906) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer plans for another war |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Aug 4 21:40:53 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer plans for another war, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Aug 4 21:03:45 2015. He enlisted in the Army and served in Korea where he earned a Purple Heart and Bronze Star. |
|
|
| (1305918) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Aug 4 22:19:26 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by TerrapIN StatiON on Tue Aug 4 21:30:19 2015. Why do you single out Mitch as a racist vfor correctly stating that Obama had a white mother when at least 2 others here refer to him as a "nigger"? Seems to me that they may be more racist. |
|
|
| (1305919) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 22:38:20 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Aug 4 18:24:54 2015. Why? Does being a Jew modify humanity one way or the other? Oh wait. You're a rightie. You have people categorized, right? |
|
|
| (1305923) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by TerrapIN StatiON on Tue Aug 4 22:41:17 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Aug 4 22:19:26 2015. Only one of those two used the term in a racist way, and he's a known racist. Nothing new there. |
|
|
| (1305925) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 22:56:50 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Aug 4 21:14:17 2015. Chuckie is a real nice guy up close and personal, and has done wonders for New York. The only thing you never want to do with Chuckie is be standing between him and a TV camera. You'll get mowed down. :) |
|
|
| (1305926) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Tue Aug 4 23:00:42 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 22:56:50 2015. Him and John Liu in one room is scary |
|
|
| (1305927) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Tue Aug 4 23:02:46 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 22:56:50 2015. I was surprised he gave up camera time to his cousin Amy the other day. |
|
|
| (1305928) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 23:05:29 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by mtk52983 on Tue Aug 4 23:00:42 2015. Wow. Now THERE'S a blast from the past for me, don't miss Liu at all. :) |
|
|
| (1305929) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 23:06:39 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by Dave on Tue Aug 4 23:02:46 2015. I would have alerted the media if I'd been aware of that. Back when the state had the NY-SCAN channel, I was chief engineer and dealt with Chuckie and his posse often. Hell of a nice guy, very smart, but man oh man when that tally light came on and the mics lit up, gangway! :) |
|
|
| (1305934) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Aug 4 23:12:07 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 22:38:20 2015. You seem to think so. You've linked many times a behavior to one's religion. |
|
|
| (1305935) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Aug 4 23:13:06 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by TerrapIN StatiON on Tue Aug 4 22:41:17 2015. So Selkirk, who you've accused of being an anti-Semite is not also a racist? |
|
|
| (1305937) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 23:16:09 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Aug 4 23:12:07 2015. Your reasoning is just as solid as your spelling. :) |
|
|
| (1305938) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 23:16:24 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Aug 4 23:13:06 2015. I'm all of the above. LOL! |
|
|
| (1305939) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by TerrapIN StatiON on Tue Aug 4 23:19:32 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Aug 4 23:13:06 2015. I thought you were referring to the two who used that term in this thread. |
|
|
| (1305942) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Tue Aug 4 23:23:12 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 23:06:39 2015. It made the national news a couple of days ago. |
|
|
| (1305943) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Aug 4 23:25:18 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by TerrapIN StatiON on Tue Aug 4 23:19:32 2015. No, I was referring to Smaz and Selkirk who seem to find every excuse to use the term while pretending that they mean it to point out other's behaviors. |
|
|
| (1305946) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 23:37:31 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Aug 4 23:25:18 2015. Poor fella ... you never learned about metaphors either, eh? |
|
|
| (1305947) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Aug 4 23:39:39 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 23:37:31 2015. I did, however, learn about rationalizations, old fool. You rationalize your behavior with the best of them. |
|
|
| (1305948) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 23:42:08 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by Dave on Tue Aug 4 23:23:12 2015. Ah ... "celebrity news" ... I ignore those kind of stories. Sorry about that. :) |
|
|
| (1305950) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 23:46:24 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Aug 4 23:39:39 2015. As I've indicated before, if you go find a lawyer, there's a large cash settlement waiting for you when you go after whoever managed your education. I mean BIG. :) |
|
|
| (1305951) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by TerrapIN StatiON on Tue Aug 4 23:49:32 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Aug 4 23:39:39 2015. iawtp |
|
|
| (1305952) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Aug 4 23:49:40 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 23:46:24 2015. Since you are barely a high school graduate, you're hardly in a position to judge. We seem to go down this road quite frequently, I notice. Virtually every time you cannot hold your own in a discussion you turn to personal insults to derail the issue. |
|
|
| (1305953) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by TerrapIN StatiON on Tue Aug 4 23:49:53 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Aug 4 23:25:18 2015. Coulda fooled me. Wait, you did. |
|
|
| (1305954) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Aug 4 23:50:20 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by TerrapIN StatiON on Tue Aug 4 23:49:32 2015. thank you |
|
|
| (1305956) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 23:53:57 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Aug 4 23:49:40 2015. Two things that most people learn at an early age that might be useful to you:1. Discussions with closed minds are like pissing into the wind. The only result is that your shoes get wet. 2. When you get older, you don't give a flying shit as to what OTHER people think. You're welcome. |
|
|
| (1305958) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Aug 5 00:18:33 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 23:53:57 2015. Barely a high school graduate and now you think you are Eddie Lawrence? You are an old fool. |
|
|
| (1305960) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Aug 5 00:37:13 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Aug 5 00:18:33 2015. Well ... since you seem to want to harp on that, I did get a semester of college in, but my mom died when I was 13 and my father died when I was 17. I was also his sole support up until he DID die.And gee ... just look at what I accomplished in my long life. Meanwhile, you can't even compose a complete sentence nor can you accomplish a single thought. If you're what "higher education" produces these days, I am more grateful than I was already. Your turn. :) |
|
|
| (1305962) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Aug 5 00:47:23 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Aug 5 00:37:13 2015. (Wipes tear from his eye) Yes, you are a true legend. |
|
|
| (1305963) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Aug 5 00:50:41 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Aug 5 00:47:23 2015. Lesson here ... nothing fazes me. :) |
|
|
| (1305969) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Wed Aug 5 04:03:05 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 4 22:56:50 2015. Sensing the presence of a TV camera is his special talent. :-) |
|
|
| (1305970) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by WillD on Wed Aug 5 04:07:37 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by Dave on Tue Aug 4 16:14:10 2015. The GBU-28 bombs (perhaps EGBU-28s with a GPS package) we gave to Israel to quiet their talk of developing nuclear bunker buster bombs is a capable penetration bomb. But when it comes to a bunker inside a mountain even the GBU-28 really can't do much more than forcibly relocating a few trees. To do some damage in that case you need something like the USAF's GBU-57 MOP or Next Generation Penetrator, both of which can only be delivered by a heavy bomber, most likely a B-2. As Israel has none of those assets in their arsenal it stands to reason their capabilities with their F-15I Ra'ams and KC-707s are rather moot.Also, flying a non-stealthy asset into the middle of Iran's air defense network is probably going to end poorly. Israel got a bit lucky with Operation Opera because the Iranians had already unsuccessfully struck the Osirak reactor and the Iraqis were looking east for another attack. The threat axis for any attack on Iran's is bound to be to the south and west, and the Iranians are unlikely to be caught napping as the Iraqis were. |
|
|
| (1305971) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Aug 5 04:16:11 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by 3-9 on Wed Aug 5 04:03:05 2015. Oh man ... for a man his age, he LEAPS at it! Sorta like bingbong has described me at Branford climbing aboard 1689 for the first time I've run an arnine in 30 years. She insists that I outdid Senator Chuckie for running for that train to climb up, charge it, and run it on down the railroad. Heh.When I worked for the MTA, the job blew goats. *NOT* having any MTA wigs around for the next run of an arnine? Get to rev it up to full speed and scare the shit out of my geese? Priceless! Heh.  Oui ... Je Suis Chuckie! (grin) |
|
|
| (1305972) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Aug 5 04:21:49 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by WillD on Wed Aug 5 04:07:37 2015. And the NGP's have *shipped* which is the reason why Obama and the Joint Chiefs were willing to sign off on this. They cheat, they eat it, simple as that. We CAN reach it now.But politicians everywhere just want to bring it on. OK. If we do, there will be hell to pay which will delight the evangelicals to no end because they get their wish. :-\ |
|
|
| (1305973) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by WillD on Wed Aug 5 04:22:09 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by Dave on Tue Aug 4 16:50:18 2015. The IAF has the toolsThat claim has repeatedly been made despite being demonstrably untrue if we constrain the scenario to conventional weapons. The only way that Israel may be able to permanently disable Iran's nuclear ambitions is through the use of their own nuclear arsenal. But if you think Israel is unwilling to deal with the political fallout from a unilateral conventional strike on Iran then a nuclear strike is absolutely unthinkable and the claim that Israel has the capability to attack Iran's nuclear facilities is little more than worthless propaganda. But then the last thing the Likud party wants to do is anything to actually address the Iran nuclear threat, that's why this is such a "bad" deal. Iran's nuclear program is a wedge issue for them, just like abortion, carbon limits, gun control, illegal immigration, or social security. They can use it to keep their political message at the forefront and get screentime for their cause so that the ultimate result is in their favor. But the worst thing that could happen would be for them to get that result because then the debate would wrap up and they'd have to fight to get that same screentime. It's only a bad deal because it threatens to move Israel's hyperbolic overblown rantings about Iran's nuclear program from the forefront. |
|
|
| (1305974) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Wed Aug 5 04:49:05 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Aug 5 04:16:11 2015. LOL, you going for that Arnine must've been a sight to see! :-) It's good you didn't let your bad experiences taint your love for those trains. |
|
|
| (1305975) | |
Re: Schmuck Schumer |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Aug 5 04:51:39 2015, in response to Re: Schmuck Schumer, posted by 3-9 on Wed Aug 5 04:49:05 2015. I never let shit stick to me. Pisses off a LOT of people around here. (grin)When you're at peace with yourself, nobody can take that away. ;) |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||