|
|
| Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views (1131598) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 5 of 6 |
||
|
| (1132182) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 4 21:32:57 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Dec 4 18:21:11 2013. I'm not the one blaming them. The republicans are. They seek to punish people for having sex. |
|
|
| (1132183) | |
Re: Pope Francis Could Kick Rush Limbaugh's Ass |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 4 21:34:59 2013, in response to Re: Pope Francis Could Kick Rush Limbaugh's Ass, posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Dec 4 18:25:20 2013. He's making it up. The Pope said no such thing. He's been trying to project this delusion onto something for a couple years now, and this time out it's the Pope. |
|
|
| (1132194) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by Elkeeper on Wed Dec 4 22:05:33 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Dec 3 22:04:41 2013. I realize that Alexander died in 1503. Luther first started to complain about the excesses of the papacy long before 1517. However, he still remained in the Church. His official break with the Church came early in 1517, Feb 27th, to be exact. Luther saw no internal reformation in the Catholic church, after Alexander's death, so he posted his 95 Theses on that date. |
|
|
| (1132195) | |
Re: Pope Francis Could Kick Rush Limbaugh's Ass |
|
|
Posted by Elkeeper on Wed Dec 4 22:07:36 2013, in response to Re: Pope Francis Could Kick Rush Limbaugh's Ass, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Dec 3 22:02:20 2013. I guess you are all right about that! |
|
|
| (1132196) | |
Re: Pope Francis Could Kick Rush Limbaugh's Ass |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 22:15:16 2013, in response to Re: Pope Francis Could Kick Rush Limbaugh's Ass, posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 4 20:00:36 2013. WABBAs Ann Dunham had not yet reached the age of 19 years, she could not possibly have lived in the United States at least five years after attaining her 14th birthday, and therefore any child born to her outside the United States or any of their/its possessions would not be a natural-born citizen. This is all academic as Obama was born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof. |
|
|
| (1132199) | |
Re: Pope Francis Could Kick Rush Limbaugh's Ass |
|
|
Posted by DAnD124 on Wed Dec 4 22:21:55 2013, in response to Re: Pope Francis Could Kick Rush Limbaugh's Ass, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 22:15:16 2013. As Ann Dunham had not yet reached the age of 19 years, she could not possibly have lived in the United States at least five years after attaining her 14th birthday, and therefore any child born to her outside the United States or any of their/its possessions would not be a natural-born citizen.i thought that wasn't the case until Reagan's amnesty bill. |
|
|
| (1132204) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Wed Dec 4 22:36:28 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 4 09:54:47 2013. How did you find all this out about my family? You are not a very nice person. Did your first husband leave you because of it? |
|
|
| (1132205) | |
Re: Pope Francis Could Kick Rush Limbaugh's Ass |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 22:42:00 2013, in response to Re: Pope Francis Could Kick Rush Limbaugh's Ass, posted by DAnD124 on Wed Dec 4 22:21:55 2013. No. |
|
|
| (1132210) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 4 22:47:32 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by R2Chinatown on Wed Dec 4 22:36:28 2013. Educated guess. Experience. Being a lot nicer than then average republican.And you ought to ask my first husband about the leaving me part, since he's been the only one, probably for longer than you've been alive. |
|
|
| (1132213) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Wed Dec 4 23:00:28 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 4 22:47:32 2013. Well then my educated guess was as wrong as yours but while my guess was based on how you conduct yourself here, yours seems to be based on a very racist view of my ethnicity. |
|
|
| (1132215) | |
Re: Pope Francis Could Kick Rush Limbaugh's Ass |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 23:18:56 2013, in response to Re: Pope Francis Could Kick Rush Limbaugh's Ass, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 22:42:00 2013. a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years. . .Immigration and Nationality Act, ch. 477, 66 Stat. 163, 236 (1952). |
|
|
| (1132216) | |
Re: Pope Francis Could Kick Rush Limbaugh's Ass |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 23:22:27 2013, in response to Re: Pope Francis Could Kick Rush Limbaugh's Ass, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 22:42:00 2013. a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years. . .Immigration and Nationality Act, ch. 477, 66 Stat. 163, 236 (1952). |
|
|
| (1132217) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 23:23:43 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 4 09:54:47 2013. This is a deeply offensive post. You've crossed the line. |
|
|
| (1132221) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Dec 4 23:27:39 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 23:23:43 2013. Offensive how? She's describing the republican philosophy of fault if you get knocked up. The old "we're for the rights of the unborn but once you're born you're on your own." Don't let that other guy make it sound like the race card, that ain't it at all. |
|
|
| (1132223) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 23:29:07 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Dec 4 23:27:39 2013. She is specifically talking about R2Chinatown's parents. |
|
|
| (1132224) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Dec 4 23:32:16 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 23:29:07 2013. How would she know anything about his parents? Just because he can't read doesn't mean others have to join in. He self-identified as a republican therefore she was arguing that he signed off on that kind of thinking. Sheesh. |
|
|
| (1132225) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Wed Dec 4 23:34:36 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 23:29:07 2013. Thank you! I found the comment both offensive and racist. |
|
|
| (1132226) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Dec 4 23:36:53 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by R2Chinatown on Wed Dec 4 23:34:36 2013. Of course you did, because you think she's the democratic enemy. I've known her for over 35 years now and that is NOT the way she rolls at all. :(Now go sit your dumb republican ass in the corner. |
|
|
| (1132229) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Wed Dec 4 23:49:54 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Dec 4 23:36:53 2013. I happen to be a registered Democrat so I don't know where you get all your silliness from. You'll pardon me for saying so but if your judgement about me is any example, you really don't make a very strong character witness for BingBong. Her comment was racist and an apology is owed. |
|
|
| (1132231) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 4 23:55:09 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by R2Chinatown on Wed Dec 4 23:49:54 2013. I happen to be a registered DemocratThat means nothing. Look at SMAZZA and Spider-Pig. |
|
|
| (1132232) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 23:55:47 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 4 23:55:09 2013. I was just going to say that! |
|
|
| (1132233) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Dec 4 23:56:43 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by R2Chinatown on Wed Dec 4 23:49:54 2013. Well ... MY apologies then. Traced back the silliness because I believe in fairness (as does Bingbong) but neither of us are democrat OR republican. Found where it all went wrong here:http://www.subchat.com/otchat/read.asp?Id=1131843 So it was actually Pigs that did the "blame game" and I see where you're coming from now. But still, she was reacting to the republican mindset of blaming the family when they have "too many children" with the corollary being "it's their fault, they're a burden on the taxpayer." As YOU indicated, you can't really plan for what comes next, you just do the best you can with the situation. But I still assert that what Bingbong was saying had nothing to do with YOU or your family and rereading the subthread, stand by that once again. Had nothing to do with you, had everything to do with the republican mindset behind what Pigs said. We cool now? |
|
|
| (1132234) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 23:59:02 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Dec 4 23:56:43 2013. She responded to the wrong post. I'm sorry for overreäcting. |
|
|
| (1132236) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Thu Dec 5 00:00:13 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 4 23:55:09 2013. I was replying to Mr. Selkirk's ignorant remark about my "dumb Republican ass". |
|
|
| (1132237) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Thu Dec 5 00:03:23 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Dec 4 23:56:43 2013. OK then. |
|
|
| (1132238) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Dec 5 00:04:38 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by R2Chinatown on Thu Dec 5 00:00:13 2013. Just worry about w1nning the thread once you get into it.w1n w1n w1n I have enough drama with the attackers of Hewitt-Prager, cortelyounext, and a leak. |
|
|
| (1132240) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Dec 5 00:08:58 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 23:59:02 2013. No prob ... we've got some new folks here who don't know how to play the subchat game yet. :) |
|
|
| (1132241) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Dec 5 00:09:28 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by R2Chinatown on Thu Dec 5 00:03:23 2013. Sorry for the misunderstandings, bro ... this place is kinda different from the rest. :) |
|
|
| (1132258) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Dec 5 03:17:52 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Dec 4 23:56:43 2013. How touching. |
|
|
| (1132260) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Dec 5 03:22:27 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Dec 4 23:56:43 2013. How touching. |
|
|
| (1132266) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Dec 5 03:32:40 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Dec 5 03:22:27 2013. Nah ... I try not to do that. You can get arrested for that these days. :) |
|
|
| (1132301) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Dec 5 09:10:12 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 23:29:07 2013. ???I read it as talking about Republicans. |
|
|
| (1132303) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 09:38:07 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by R2Chinatown on Wed Dec 4 23:00:28 2013. You're guess wasn't educated, or you wouldn't have brought it up. MIne is based on sociological data compared with policy statements of various politicians since 1980. |
|
|
| (1132304) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 09:41:47 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Dec 5 00:04:38 2013. Hewitt-Prager deserve the attacks they get. The fewer people that follow them the better. There's more than enough hate in this country already. |
|
|
| (1132318) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Thu Dec 5 11:03:23 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 09:38:07 2013. Nonsense. What sociological data do you have about my parents? You tried to equate my parents with false racist ethnic stereotypes. |
|
|
| (1132320) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Thu Dec 5 11:05:05 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 09:41:47 2013. Then you should leave ASAP. I have not heard more hate coming from any other individual here. |
|
|
| (1132324) | |
Re: Pope Francis Could Kick Rush Limbaugh's Ass |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Thu Dec 5 11:14:34 2013, in response to Re: Pope Francis Could Kick Rush Limbaugh's Ass, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 23:18:56 2013. The 1986 Act made the natural-born status retroactive to 1952, meaning that Barack would have still been eligible for the Presidency even if born in Kenya.8 U.S.C. § 1401(g): (g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of Title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of Title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; |
|
|
| (1132325) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Dec 5 11:18:08 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by R2Chinatown on Thu Dec 5 11:03:23 2013. She's talking about Republicans in general, not your parents in particular. |
|
|
| (1132326) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Thu Dec 5 11:19:09 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 4 23:55:09 2013. Look at SMAZZA and Spider-Pig.I voted for Lhota. |
|
|
| (1132331) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Thu Dec 5 11:29:52 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by AlM on Thu Dec 5 11:18:08 2013. I only mentioned my parents and my family. If she wants to equate people with negative stereotypes then she should start with her own family. Why do you and Mr. Selkirk think that you need to explain what she meant to say. Maybe if she were more careful in choosing her words then it wouldn't be necessary.Sorry but I need to finish unpacking. Moving is so tedious and I go back to work soon. I have no more time to waste on her. |
|
|
| (1132336) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Thu Dec 5 11:37:34 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by R2Chinatown on Thu Dec 5 11:29:52 2013. Maybe if she were more careful in choosing her words then it wouldn't be necessary.
|
|
|
| (1132340) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Dec 5 11:53:10 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by R2Chinatown on Thu Dec 5 00:00:13 2013. He labels anyone that disagrees with him as a "Republican". After all, you have to believe all Democratic Dogma, or you are some sort of right wing nut according to him. |
|
|
| (1132341) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Dec 5 11:54:07 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 09:41:47 2013. Of course. The Staunch Democratic leftist ideal is to get rid of anyone who does not agree with their dogma. |
|
|
| (1132343) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Dec 5 11:56:00 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by AlM on Thu Dec 5 11:18:08 2013. No, she's talking about her ideal of the Republican stereotype. |
|
|
| (1132344) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Dec 5 11:56:25 2013, in response to Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by streetcarman1 on Tue Dec 3 13:34:20 2013. Why in the world do you listen to RUsh Limbaugh? |
|
|
| (1132360) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 12:30:54 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Dec 5 11:54:07 2013. Who said get rid of them? What I said is they are undeserving of the level of attention they receive. They belong in the "hateful bad ideas" section,basically ignored. |
|
|
| (1132361) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 12:33:07 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by AlM on Thu Dec 5 11:18:08 2013. That's correct. Anyone who takes it personally, as it was addressed third-person, has themselves to wonder why. |
|
|
| (1132362) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 12:33:55 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 4 23:29:07 2013. Wrong. Totally wrong. |
|
|
| (1132363) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 12:40:04 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Dec 5 11:56:00 2013. You mean the stereotype republicans that want to permit employers in the secular public marketplace to dictate reproductive dogma to their employees?The only exemption for contraceptives should be actual pastoral church employees. The kind where the employer can pick and choose based on the individual employee's personal religious practice. |
|
|
| (1132364) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 12:41:06 2013, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh and his anti-Catholic views, posted by R2Chinatown on Thu Dec 5 11:03:23 2013. No I did not. That was all of your own making. Read what I wrote. |
|
|
|
Page 5 of 6 |
||