|
|
| Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? (40206) | |
 |
|
| Home > The Reef | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 8 of 11 |
||
|
| (40556) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:13:56 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by trainsarefun on Thu Jan 1 22:40:52 2009. It's not a presumption that one is entitled to respect in the ordinary sense, however. Jack the Ripper who is caught actively gutting a woman's body is presumed innocent by the law until proven guilty in a court of law or until he lawfully concedes the same. He is not presumed innocent by anyone who is cognitively functional.Irrelevant in this context. Steven was not caught. A photo of the "incident" is all that we have, and that photo leaves enough unanswered questions to warrant him not being presumed guilty. |
|
| (40557) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Jan 1 23:14:00 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by rionOne on Thu Jan 1 14:13:33 2009. That's a zinger if there ever was one. |
|
| (40558) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 1 23:15:41 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Subterranean Railway on Thu Jan 1 23:13:54 2009. They was "authorized"... |
|
| (40559) | |
Re: Proof that it is a crime (was: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?) |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:16:08 2009, in response to Re: Proof that it is a crime (was: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?), posted by Train Dude on Thu Jan 1 22:28:07 2009. Why, is someone going to actually follow through and submit this to the NYPD (assuming they don't already know about it)? |
|
| (40560) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Jan 1 23:17:08 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jan 1 14:03:21 2009. What does this rule refer to exactly (the 1 in 3), for those not in the know? |
|
| (40561) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:17:36 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 1 22:53:24 2009. if an employee allows such person in the cab said employee is violating the rulesI know. Then said employee would be the one responsible. How is a member of the public supposed to know that the employee is not authorized to allow him into the cab? |
|
| (40562) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jan 1 23:17:51 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by mr_brian on Wed Dec 31 18:34:36 2008. Yup. Gotta get in before the
|
|
| (40563) | |
raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Thu Jan 1 23:17:59 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:07:00 2009. you're a fucking fucker who has shit for brains and a flower for a dick. you're a little man who couldn't cut it being a bus driver so they forced you to resign in shame and now you draw pictures for children for pennies. you're a disgrace to your friends and family. and you'll probably die of a heart attack while composing one of your stupid posts here. And I'd laugh at thatI have read some proverbial raw sewage, but that's about the lowest thing that I've read on here, or even a lot of other places too. That you would stoop to repeat it strongly suggests to me that you're a very, very petty person who is extremely insecure about himself. And that's about the nicest thing that I can say, so I'll stop there. |
|
| (40564) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:18:05 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Subterranean Railway on Thu Jan 1 23:13:54 2009. I'm sure there are a million official exceptions to a lot of rules. |
|
| (40565) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 1 23:18:09 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:11:22 2009. It pays to "know" the rules and this one was violated now a law thats another matter |
|
| (40566) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:19:01 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by 33rd Street on Thu Jan 1 22:58:03 2009. Yes, I am. He doesn't deserve this bullsh*t you are giving him. He's been nothing short of respectful and open here. Cut it out. |
|
| (40567) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 1 23:19:37 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:17:36 2009. How is a member of the public supposed to know that the employee is not authorized to allow him into the cab?Common sense.. Rolls eyes,shakes head... |
|
| (40568) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Jan 1 23:20:23 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jan 1 21:46:49 2009. Thank you. |
|
| (40569) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:20:23 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Edwards! on Thu Jan 1 23:03:31 2009. DAMN, you are a damn fool. The R-110B (C) did not make two trips after it was withdrawn from service the last time. Must be the moron syndrome in you. |
|
| (40570) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by GOLD_12th on Thu Jan 1 23:21:03 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:07:00 2009. Dude, get a grip.Just STFU. |
|
| (40571) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 1 23:21:11 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:18:05 2009. Not a million not down here...Not saying there arent any either i just stated one.. |
|
| (40572) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:21:56 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Jan 1 23:14:00 2009. Nope. Don't be stupid. You know what happens when you 'be stupid. |
|
| (40573) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Subterranean Railway on Thu Jan 1 23:23:02 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 1 23:15:41 2009. Sorry, I misread your post. For some reason I thought you wrote that no one except authorized TA employees were allowed in cabs, which of course is nonsensical. :-) |
|
| (40574) | |
Re: raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:23:02 2009, in response to raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by trainsarefun on Thu Jan 1 23:17:59 2009. LOL, no, it shows that I can dish it out just as well as anyone, and I'm not afraid to, no matter what the hypocrites claim. |
|
| (40575) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Jan 1 23:24:12 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jan 1 22:14:31 2009. No. |
|
| (40576) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:24:44 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 1 23:18:09 2009. False. A member of the public would not get in trouble for following the direction of an MTA employee in an act that they could reasonably not be expected to not know that the MTA employee was not authorized to authorize. See Salaam's incident for proff. He did not get in trouble for that AFAIK. But the T/O may have. |
|
| (40577) | |
Re: raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Jan 1 23:25:03 2009, in response to raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by trainsarefun on Thu Jan 1 23:17:59 2009. It goes both ways, Train Dude, SUBWAYSURF, and Edwards have stooped just as low. |
|
| (40578) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:25:54 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 1 23:19:37 2009. False. Pilots used to let kids into the cockpit. This is a similar thing. |
|
| (40579) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Thu Jan 1 23:26:20 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:19:01 2009. You are sinking faster than a rock. |
|
| (40580) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:26:29 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by GOLD_12th on Thu Jan 1 23:21:03 2009. how bout you get a clue and f*cking STFU? |
|
| (40581) | |
Re: raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Thu Jan 1 23:27:18 2009, in response to raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by trainsarefun on Thu Jan 1 23:17:59 2009. INTERNET=SERIOUS BUSINESS!
|
|
| (40582) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:27:37 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 1 23:21:11 2009. Well I think there are. |
|
| (40583) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 1 23:27:38 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:24:44 2009. My response was directed towards the employee not the person.You do understand that right you said it in another post. Go and find a post where i said a law was violated.. |
|
| (40584) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Thu Jan 1 23:27:58 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:25:54 2009. How can you compare trains to airplanes? |
|
| (40585) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Jan 1 23:28:07 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 1 23:19:37 2009. If it were common sense, it wouldn't need to be said. |
|
| (40586) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 1 23:28:24 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:25:54 2009. Apples and Oranges Terrapin ...Airlines arent the MTA or RTO.. |
|
| (40587) | |
Re: raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:28:34 2009, in response to Re: raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Jan 1 23:25:03 2009. Thank you. I'm thankful for the few intelligent people here who aren't so damn biased. |
|
| (40588) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Jan 1 23:28:35 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by 33rd Street on Thu Jan 1 23:26:20 2009. The bandwagon looks like a Tokyo subway car in the rush hour today lol. |
|
| (40589) | |
Re: raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Thu Jan 1 23:28:42 2009, in response to Re: raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Jan 1 23:25:03 2009. Answer me this, does this make it okay? |
|
| (40590) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 1 23:28:54 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:27:37 2009. Your Opinion... |
|
| (40591) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:28:54 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by 33rd Street on Thu Jan 1 23:26:20 2009. nope. |
|
| (40592) | |
Re: raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Thu Jan 1 23:29:12 2009, in response to Re: raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Jan 1 23:25:03 2009. As has Mr. Mabstoa in other threads. |
|
| (40593) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:29:42 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Jan 1 23:24:12 2009. Thank you again. |
|
| (40594) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 1 23:29:50 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by 33rd Street on Thu Jan 1 23:27:58 2009. I just asked him the same question... |
|
| (40595) | |
Re: raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Jan 1 23:30:10 2009, in response to Re: raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Kriston Lewis on Thu Jan 1 23:28:42 2009. Not at all, I just think that trainsarefun is jumping to conclusions a bit too early in this situation. |
|
| (40596) | |
Re: raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Jan 1 23:30:13 2009, in response to Re: raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Jan 1 23:25:03 2009. Actually, Train Dude has been extremely tolerable of late (since the elections have passed), as have the other posters. |
|
| (40597) | |
Re: raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:30:15 2009, in response to Re: raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Kriston Lewis on Thu Jan 1 23:27:18 2009. according to you, you mean. you think it's so serious that you have a mental killfile going! LOL!!! |
|
| (40598) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Thu Jan 1 23:30:19 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Jan 1 23:17:08 2009. The actual statute is, I believe, translated from the original Sumerian into Czech and then translated into English, but it reads:§ 61. Appointment and promotion. 1. Appointment or promotion from eligible lists. Appointment or promotion from an eligible list to a position in the competitive class shall be made by the selection of one of the three persons certified by the appropriate civil service commission as standing highest on such eligible list who are willing to accept such appointment or promotion; provided, however, that the state or a municipal commission may provide, by rule, that where it is necessary to break ties among eligibles having the same final examination ratings in order to determine their respective standings on the eligible list, appointment or promotion may be made by the selection of any eligible whose final examination rating is equal to or higher than the final examination rating of the third highest standing eligible willing to accept such appointment or promotion. Appointments and promotions shall be made from the eligible list most nearly appropriate for the position to be filled. Essentially, the appointing authority has discretion to refuse to appoint/promote those on a competitive exam list. It would have been nice if the law spelled out what the limits on the discretion are, but don't worry, there are about several hundred cases that do this for you, or which, at any rate, claim to. So the basic idea is that not even two of the top three scorers have a right to the appointment/promotion. |
|
| (40599) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 1 23:31:23 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Jan 1 23:28:07 2009. Then i guess someone dont have any of it then if this is an "actual"photo.. |
|
| (40600) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by GOLD_12th on Thu Jan 1 23:32:04 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:26:29 2009. It is so funny that you still a nuthead.How about trying to spell out the word... F-U-C-K. You loser. Now, go back to bed since there lots of members would like to kick your ass. |
|
| (40601) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:32:07 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 1 23:27:38 2009. Well I was talking about the person. So you wasted your time. But thanks for finally agreeing that the person may not have been doing anything wrong then. |
|
| (40602) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:32:34 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by 33rd Street on Thu Jan 1 23:27:58 2009. huh? i compared a cockpit to a cab. |
|
| (40603) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:32:53 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Jan 1 23:28:07 2009. Exactly. |
|
| (40604) | |
Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:33:06 2009, in response to Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 1 23:28:24 2009. False, it is a valid comparison. |
|
| (40605) | |
Re: raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 23:33:36 2009, in response to Re: raw sewage Re: Is it me, or is Steven at it again?, posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Jan 1 23:30:10 2009. Exactly. You are wise beyond your years. I thank you. |
|
|
Page 8 of 11 |
||