|
|
| Abilify (906013) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 5 of 6 |
||
|
| (907922) | |
Abilify |
|
|
Posted by ebtmikado on Thu Mar 4 11:03:45 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 4 10:46:32 2010. Maybe some old-fashioned doctor still has an electro-therapy machine? |
|
|
| (907923) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Thu Mar 4 11:04:52 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 4 10:46:32 2010. Why the hell do you always change the subject line? |
|
|
| (907926) | |
Meh... |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Thu Mar 4 11:11:23 2010, in response to Re:, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Thu Mar 4 11:04:52 2010. This is how i view it ..... |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (907927) | |
Re: Meh... |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Thu Mar 4 11:12:53 2010, in response to Meh..., posted by Railman718 on Thu Mar 4 11:11:23 2010. Thanks for my Initials.... |
|
|
| (907932) | |
Re: Meh... |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Thu Mar 4 11:19:44 2010, in response to Re: Meh..., posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Thu Mar 4 11:12:53 2010. You are welcome anytime! |
|
|
| (907936) | |
Re: Meh... |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Thu Mar 4 11:38:29 2010, in response to Re: Meh..., posted by Railman718 on Thu Mar 4 11:19:44 2010. LOL! BTW, Gonna rally this evening, should be fun ;) |
|
|
| (908044) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Thu Mar 4 17:10:59 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Mar 2 09:38:18 2010. oic, so they've basically kept the entire 4-car train for all hours? |
|
|
| (908046) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Thu Mar 4 17:12:31 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Vacuum Tube on Tue Mar 2 06:44:49 2010. of course the trains will be scrapped, but that could be years from now. Why fix up trains that'll have to go away in months? |
|
|
| (908047) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Thu Mar 4 17:12:47 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by The Flxible Neofan on Tue Mar 2 09:27:47 2010. Exactly. |
|
|
| (908055) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 4 17:26:59 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Grand Concourse on Thu Mar 4 17:12:31 2010. It's a good thing that the meme that this thread inspired has died out, so the complainers have been proven wrong. As for this thread itself, it's a waste . . . |
|
|
| (908070) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Thu Mar 4 18:01:22 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 4 17:26:59 2010. yeah, this thread needs to be reefed. |
|
|
| (908189) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 4 23:35:32 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Vacuum Tube on Thu Mar 4 06:37:45 2010. Well, I guess you are entitled to your opinion. Then again, it is you who is fighting against a tide of challenges to your credibility. It's you who can't provide a source for what you have posted. On the other hand, I could post exactly the same information and other than you and possibly one or two other neanderthals, I doubt that anyone would doubt my word. So there you have it. You can call me train weasel if you wish but we know the vacuum in your handle is a vacuum of credibility.BTW: You have yet to post a source for your information. if it were true, you'd certainly be able to cite a source. |
|
|
| (908201) | |
Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Thu Mar 4 23:45:15 2010, in response to R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Vacuum Tube on Sun Feb 28 11:08:36 2010. Just spoke to sources and the SMS rebuilding program has stopped for the SIRT cars, TA say it's not worth it to rebuild them anymore, word has been going around that it will be either R46, R68, or any N.T.T. will be headed over there in the very near future. Train Dude, shoot me an e-mail when you get a chance. |
|
|
| (908203) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by R42 4820 on Thu Mar 4 23:46:51 2010, in response to Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Thu Mar 4 23:45:15 2010. Congratulations MTA for wasting money SMSing the cars. Great, just great. |
|
|
| (908214) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 5 00:06:07 2010, in response to Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Thu Mar 4 23:45:15 2010. Shoot you an e-mail?? What would you like me to say in that e-mail? |
|
|
| (908215) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Mar 5 00:06:39 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 5 00:06:07 2010. Let me e-mail you then, i'll tell you the reason in the mail. |
|
|
| (908223) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 5 00:24:11 2010, in response to Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Thu Mar 4 23:45:15 2010. It's been said that if you give an infinite number of chimps and infinite numbers of typewriters and an infinite quantity of paper, one will eventually type the works of Shakespear.The issue is not whether the blurbs spouted by vacuum tube is or is not correct. it is that given his lack of credibility, his statements should not be taken on their face without some sourcing. Keep in mind that everything is only speculation until the MTA board approves and the Transit President signs off on it. |
|
|
| (908226) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Mar 5 00:26:37 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 5 00:24:11 2010. Thats the thing with V.T. He has no credibility, and he constantly challenges you. So is he an employee? Or just another foamer who "hears" things and makes them sound official? |
|
|
| (908227) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Mar 5 00:28:54 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Mar 5 00:26:37 2010. He's probably a new incarnation of an erstwhile testudine. |
|
|
| (908233) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Fri Mar 5 01:21:23 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Mar 2 09:36:20 2010. I have little interest in Staten Island and its operations, so I usually avoid those threads. |
|
|
| (908238) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Mar 5 01:57:39 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by G1Ravage on Fri Mar 5 01:21:23 2010. What brought you into this one? |
|
|
| (908239) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by Vacuum Tube on Fri Mar 5 02:13:42 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 4 23:35:32 2010. Wipe them tears away from your eyes, pooh pooh.Ha Ha Ha Ha |
|
|
| (908240) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Vacuum Tube on Fri Mar 5 02:23:30 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 5 00:24:11 2010. Proposals not speculation. But no proof. |
|
|
| (908253) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by R42 4820 on Fri Mar 5 07:09:36 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Train Dude on Thu Mar 4 23:35:32 2010. I'm starting to think that Vacuum Tube is a foamer. |
|
|
| (908275) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by ebtmikado on Fri Mar 5 08:48:22 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Olog-hai on Fri Mar 5 00:28:54 2010. Easy way to find out.... Do not reply to any of his postings until he has written the name of Adoshem on here... |
|
|
| (908309) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Dan on Fri Mar 5 10:21:00 2010, in response to Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Thu Mar 4 23:45:15 2010. "TA say it's not worth it to rebuild them anymore....."IF TRUE, why did it take them this long to figure that out? How many R44SI cars have been rebuilt so far? |
|
|
| (908310) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Fri Mar 5 10:23:22 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Grand Concourse on Thu Mar 4 17:10:59 2010. Yes. But it's been a while since I stood around and watched. It may just be a winter thing. |
|
|
| (908311) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Fri Mar 5 10:23:53 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Grand Concourse on Thu Mar 4 17:12:31 2010. They freshly painted the R10s... |
|
|
| (908314) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Fri Mar 5 10:33:43 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by R42 4820 on Fri Mar 5 07:09:36 2010. Vacuum Tube is Brian in a dress. |
|
|
| (908324) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by R42 4820 on Fri Mar 5 11:03:19 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Hank Eisenstein on Fri Mar 5 10:33:43 2010. LMAO!!! |
|
|
| (908403) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by TheCiskoKid on Fri Mar 5 15:51:43 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Vacuum Tube on Fri Mar 5 02:13:42 2010. Why are you acting so childlike? If you picked up some information and you elected to share it, fine. But why do you want to act like such a mutt and be shunned by the rest of the community? |
|
|
| (908478) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Images on Fri Mar 5 19:55:59 2010, in response to Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Thu Mar 4 23:45:15 2010. Just spoke to sources and the SMS rebuilding program has stopped for the SIRT cars.....Most of those R-44's have been GOH'd, with only a hand full left to be done. Perhaps that's why the end of GOH ? Bill Newkirk |
|
|
| (908490) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 5 20:53:59 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by TheCiskoKid on Fri Mar 5 15:51:43 2010. The boy is a punk :) |
|
|
| (908496) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 5 21:30:22 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Mar 5 00:26:37 2010. There are so many rumors out on the shop floors that anyone from a supervisor to a car inspector to a cleaner to an apprentice or even an intern might hear and/or repeat. Some of it might be true while more may be bull. The fact of the matter is that while I've had the information since December, until my boss gets it signed by the president and he gives it to me in writing:**the R-44s are not getting scrapped. **The R-44s in Staten Island are still going to be SMS'd **and none of my R-46s are going to be modified for service in Staten Island as a bridge fleet. I might have actually gotten the real story at dinner last night. Time will tell. Will vacuous tube reveal his source? |
|
|
| (908512) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by Vacuum Tube on Fri Mar 5 22:39:00 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 5 20:53:59 2010. You should consider changing your handle to Train Dud or Train Weasel.They both fit you perfect. |
|
|
| (908514) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by R42 4820 on Fri Mar 5 22:47:17 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Vacuum Tube on Fri Mar 5 22:39:00 2010. Really, who are you again?Do you know who you're talking to? You're talking to Train fucking Dude here! The yard manager of Pitkin Yard.... Your credibility has sank faster than the Redbirds. |
|
|
| (908516) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by R42 4820 on Fri Mar 5 22:47:37 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 5 20:53:59 2010. Ignore him.... |
|
|
| (908519) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Vacuum Tube on Fri Mar 5 23:00:04 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 5 21:30:22 2010. In your first satement you stated that you had the info since Dec..Then in your last statement you stated you might have gotten the real story last night. This is very contradicting! Do you really know what you are talking about? If you can't talk about proposals, you should shut your trap until your boss gives it to you in writing. |
|
|
| (908520) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by R42 4820 on Fri Mar 5 23:24:20 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Vacuum Tube on Fri Mar 5 23:00:04 2010. Um...WHO ARE YOU AGAIN??? |
|
|
| (908521) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Mar 5 23:25:17 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by R42 4820 on Fri Mar 5 23:24:20 2010. Without him, subchat looses suction? Strange... |
|
|
| (908522) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by R42 4820 on Fri Mar 5 23:27:23 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Mar 5 23:25:17 2010. LMAO! Good one there :-D |
|
|
| (908523) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Mar 5 23:27:45 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Vacuum Tube on Fri Mar 5 23:00:04 2010. Stop acting like you've been vindicated. |
|
|
| (908524) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Mar 5 23:29:51 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Vacuum Tube on Fri Mar 5 22:39:00 2010. You should consider going away and not coming back, maybe. |
|
|
| (908527) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Vacuum Tube on Fri Mar 5 23:36:47 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Mar 5 23:29:51 2010. You should go back to middle earth as good little troll. |
|
|
| (908533) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Fri Mar 5 23:53:45 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Hank Eisenstein on Fri Mar 5 10:23:22 2010. Oh ok. |
|
|
| (908535) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Fri Mar 5 23:54:32 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Hank Eisenstein on Fri Mar 5 10:23:53 2010. heh, but did they do anything else to those trains? |
|
|
| (908536) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Mar 5 23:57:38 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Vacuum Tube on Fri Mar 5 23:36:47 2010. WWYBYWB? It's time to come clean. |
|
|
| (908542) | |
Re: All This Bullshit |
|
|
Posted by R32_3671 on Sat Mar 6 00:05:42 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Mar 5 23:57:38 2010. All everyone hears is BULLSHITWhy Would the MTA Waste Money On SMS the SIR R44's and Later Reef them, That Would Be a Fucking Waste As for The R44's on the (A), THEY ARE A PEICE OF SHIT, We all know whats going, I already Know, Its so obvious. Having R44's that fall apart is no good at all. |
|
|
| (908599) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Sat Mar 6 08:07:52 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Vacuum Tube on Fri Mar 5 23:00:04 2010. He heard a story in December, and a more reliable story last night. How is that contradictory?As far as I can tell he did (unlike ewe) keep his trap shut. You'd better check to be sure that your vacuum is all there. ROAR |
|
|
| (908600) | |
Re: All This Bullshit |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Sat Mar 6 08:11:30 2010, in response to Re: All This Bullshit, posted by R32_3671 on Sat Mar 6 00:05:42 2010. "Why Would the MTA Waste Money On SMS the SIR R44's and Later Reef them, That Would Be a Fucking Waste"Actually there are many good reasons to do so. 1) The money came from someone else. 2) It gives work to the people at CI yard. 3) It gives subchatters some chatter to yatter about. ROAR |
|
|
|
Page 5 of 6 |
||
