|
|
| Speaker Pelosi (1680075) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
Page 1 of 4 |
|
|
| (1680075) | |
Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 11:17:43 2019 You heard her. |
|
|
| (1680079) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Dec 5 11:22:43 2019, in response to Speaker Pelosi, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 11:17:43 2019. Yes; foot in mouth yet again. |
|
|
| (1680082) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Dec 5 11:25:27 2019, in response to Speaker Pelosi, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 11:17:43 2019. Sick bitch, stuttering and stammering. She's painful to listen to. |
|
|
| (1680124) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 13:26:06 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Dec 5 11:22:43 2019. Hardly. |
|
|
| (1680126) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 13:29:50 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by Train Dude on Thu Dec 5 11:25:27 2019. Not in the least. She is first among the few rays of light in Washington.And there's a pile of over 100 already passed bills sitting on McConnell’s desk as I typo that are simply sitting there. Many address important issues to the voters. Is the Senate going to do anything about them? |
|
|
| (1680133) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Dec 5 13:43:21 2019, in response to Speaker Pelosi, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 11:17:43 2019. She's very creepy. |
|
|
| (1680136) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Dec 5 13:45:51 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 13:29:50 2019. You stupid cunt, why would you ask me an idiotic question like that? You have 2 democrat senators from NY. Why don't you get off your fat ass and ask them? |
|
|
| (1680137) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Dec 5 13:47:01 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Dec 5 13:43:21 2019. She dives for Tootsie Rolls in her septic tank |
|
|
| (1680143) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Dec 5 13:51:46 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by Train Dude on Thu Dec 5 13:45:51 2019. LOL |
|
|
| (1680146) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Dec 5 13:51:58 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by Train Dude on Thu Dec 5 13:47:01 2019. LOL |
|
|
| (1680148) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Thu Dec 5 13:55:24 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 13:29:50 2019. Text corrected. You're welcome.Not in the least. She is first among the few rays of light in Washington. And there's a pile of over 100 already passed bills sitting on mcconnell’s desk as I type that are simply sitting there. Many address important issues to the voters. Is the Senate going to do anything about them? |
|
|
| (1680158) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by ntrainride on Thu Dec 5 14:17:35 2019, in response to Speaker Pelosi, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 11:17:43 2019. this is truly a sad day in our country. i am totally sickened by the actions of these impeachment-seeking phonies. not ONE of those retards have any love for our country.our future is looking pretty dim right now. the world is going to be spitting on our graves as we dissolve into the equivalent of a central american shithole country. as their children suffer maybe a few will see the error of their demented ways. |
|
|
| (1680161) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Dec 5 14:31:33 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Dec 5 13:51:46 2019. I wasn't joking. |
|
|
| (1680163) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Dec 5 14:39:29 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by Train Dude on Thu Dec 5 13:45:51 2019. Because they’re Democrats and have no bearing on the actions of Moscow Mitch. |
|
|
| (1680174) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Dec 5 15:17:32 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Dec 5 14:39:29 2019. Alas another who has no comprehension of the English language. Clearly, I meant that bingbong should get off of her fat ass and ask her two senators who represent her in the Senate. Sorry you don't understand. |
|
|
| (1680197) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Thu Dec 5 16:27:48 2019, in response to Speaker Pelosi, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 11:17:43 2019. Sorry, but I'm always a little suspicious when somebody pushes their religious bonafides as proof that they're not. |
|
|
| (1680209) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Thu Dec 5 16:35:38 2019, in response to Speaker Pelosi, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 11:17:43 2019. Was she drunk during it?Why won't she release her tax forms and medical records? What is she hiding? Is she violating the Pelosi provision? A law passed with her name since she's so corrupt. |
|
|
| (1680220) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Thu Dec 5 17:05:42 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Dec 5 13:43:21 2019.  |
|
|
| (1680228) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 18:12:54 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Dec 5 13:43:21 2019. No, she isn’t. |
|
|
| (1680230) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 18:16:27 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Thu Dec 5 16:35:38 2019. No. That's ridiculous. You've been watching too many fake news videos of her. They have to doctor the footage to make her appear drunk. It's a lie, fake news.She isn’t,t hiding anyone, and there’s no reason for anyone to see her personal health records. Come to think about it, let's see yours. You make some pretty wild posts here, as suspect there's some mental illness we should all know about. |
|
|
| (1680232) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 18:19:45 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by ntrainride on Thu Dec 5 14:17:35 2019. It's the people seeking impeachment that are truly concerned about the future of our democracy and way of life. It's some of those in power that are spinning us into a third rate dictatorship. We already have a president that's pushing for just that.First rule that's being ignored is that NOBODY is above the law. |
|
|
| (1680233) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Dec 5 18:26:01 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by ntrainride on Thu Dec 5 14:17:35 2019. BULLSHIT! |
|
|
| (1680234) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Dec 5 18:26:39 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 18:19:45 2019. IAWTP |
|
|
| (1680235) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Dec 5 18:28:59 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 18:12:54 2019. Figures |
|
|
| (1680236) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Dec 5 18:29:18 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Dec 5 18:26:39 2019. Figures |
|
|
| (1680237) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Dec 5 18:30:16 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by ntrainride on Thu Dec 5 14:17:35 2019. Was that second paragraph really necessary? |
|
|
| (1680241) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Dec 5 18:35:46 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 18:16:27 2019. How's your mother feeling? |
|
|
| (1680243) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Dec 5 18:51:33 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Dec 5 18:29:18 2019. WHAT ??????????? |
|
|
| (1680249) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Dec 5 18:59:23 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by ntrainride on Thu Dec 5 14:17:35 2019. I disagree. We will not dissolve into the equivalent of a central american shithole country. The sky is not falling. This is strictly a political move based on Democratic party impotence of not having a candidate that can beat Trump in the 2020 election, straight answer. Its politics ahead of country. Its beyond stupid that nobody in the democratic party leadership realizes that this is all a big waste of time. He will not be convicted in the Senate. Let the voters "impeach" him at the voting booth if so warrented. Bottom line here is whatever happens, this country will survive. If we weren't torn apart in the 60s (which I lived thru) whats happening here is a stroll in the park.BTW, for what its worth, the Books at Las Vegas (they'll take action on anything) say the money is going on Trump to not be removed from office via impeachment and will be reelected in 2020. Now how's that for an unofficial poll? |
|
|
| (1680250) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Dec 5 18:59:59 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Dec 5 18:51:33 2019. Lol |
|
|
| (1680254) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Thu Dec 5 19:08:58 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Dec 5 18:59:23 2019. It's not a big waste of time. Apparently President Trump committed a crime, and it's Congress' responsibility to take him to task for it, or at least try. That's how checks and balances work. I would find it hugely remiss if they didn't try, because that would essentially mean they would be giving him carte blanche to do whatever he wants. If that happens, then we are truly heading for a dictatorship. |
|
|
| (1680255) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Dec 5 19:10:05 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Dec 5 18:59:23 2019. No, the impeachment is about a President of the United States abusing the powers of his office to influence the outcome of an election, by soliciting a foreign power to smear his political rival in exchange for military aid that had already been approved by Congress. There is overwhelming evidence of this. In so doing, Trump severely compromised the integrity of his office, and undermined public confidence in our electoral process. Such criminal conduct is so egregious that we as a nation, cannot afford to wait for another election to remove Trump from office. |
|
|
| (1680258) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Dec 5 19:10:49 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by 3-9 on Thu Dec 5 19:08:58 2019. Excellent post. IAWTP |
|
|
| (1680262) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Dec 5 19:13:37 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Dec 5 18:59:23 2019. Bullshit Trumpaganda.The impeachment is because the president is a criminal. If a fair trial is held in the a Senate and Trump isn’t convicted, that’s because of Trump’s loyal enablers, and nothing else. The fact that you believe that the Democrats have no one who can beat Trump is on you. The election of Trump is proof that higher mental functions are no obstacle to being able to vote. |
|
|
| (1680268) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 19:23:41 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Dec 5 18:59:23 2019. Every single Democratic Party candidate beats trump in all the polls I've seen thus far.I wouldn't bet on that. Although they have enough facts to write charges, the entire story about this is not yet known. Nor is results from other less covered investigations which could produce new charges known to be completed as of now. |
|
|
| (1680269) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 19:25:21 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Dec 5 19:10:05 2019. Especially as he was compromising the electoral process by doing this. That’s why they must move on this now, it cannot wait. |
|
|
| (1680270) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 19:29:57 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by 3-9 on Thu Dec 5 16:27:48 2019. I don't see that in what she said. In bringing up religion as a factor to inform a point of personal (not imposing such on others) worldview, it adds a degree of sincerity to such. |
|
|
| (1680271) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 19:31:18 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Dec 5 18:35:46 2019. She's doing fine. Just turned 94. Finally getting new glasses to accommodate her visual changes. |
|
|
| (1680272) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Dec 5 19:32:46 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 19:31:18 2019. G-d bless her. |
|
|
| (1680273) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 19:33:13 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Dec 5 19:32:46 2019. Really. |
|
|
| (1680275) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Dec 5 19:36:42 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 19:33:13 2019. Yes, really. I'm being sincere. |
|
|
| (1680276) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Dec 5 19:38:18 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 19:25:21 2019. Exactly. It was the possibility of the president himself tampering with the election that convinced recalcitrant delegates at the Constitutional Convention to support the inclusion of impeachment and removal in the Constitution. |
|
|
| (1680285) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Dec 5 19:50:43 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Dec 5 19:13:37 2019. Its the lack of "higher mental functions" that plague the Democrats into believing that they can remove Trump via impeachment.That said, who can beat Trump? I'll stick my neck out so far as to say that Biden will not even get the nomination. Maybe Hillary will give it another shot? She was on the Stern show the other day, responding to Howards observation that she lost in 2016 a/c she refused to appear on his show then thus not getting any of his listeners to vote for her (she took the bait, his thought). Seems that maybe desperation prevails?? |
|
|
| (1680288) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Dec 5 20:09:27 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 19:23:41 2019. You're like the "Mush" from A Bronx Tale. Now it's a GUARANTEE that DJT will be exoand win again (although that's going to happen anyway) |
|
|
| (1680289) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Dec 5 20:10:03 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Dec 5 19:10:05 2019. Not gonna happen. |
|
|
| (1680291) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Dec 5 20:19:57 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Dec 5 20:10:03 2019. Oh, I agree, but only because Moscow Mitch and Trump's Republican allies in the Senate have already decided the outcome of the trial. |
|
|
| (1680293) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 20:24:59 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Dec 5 19:36:42 2019. I know, and fully appreciate it. I'm in awe of her ability to soldier on. |
|
|
| (1680296) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Dec 5 20:32:20 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 20:24:59 2019. Ok oh. I misinterpreted. My bad. I apologize. |
|
|
| (1680297) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 20:34:35 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Dec 5 20:19:57 2019. And they will only harm themselves as they will be doing so after all the available facts by that time are aired for all to see. I guess it’s their right to make themselves look bad. |
|
|
| (1680298) | |
Re: Speaker Pelosi |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Dec 5 20:37:40 2019, in response to Re: Speaker Pelosi, posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Dec 5 20:32:20 2019. No problem. Ididn't exactly make my point clearly enough. |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 4 |
|