Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)

Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error) (1278069)	Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

First : << [11]

< Previous Page

Page 11 of 11

(1452171)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by WillD* on Mon Jul 31 12:12:32 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error), posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jul 31 12:04:21 2017.* In the flesh and all. I have to participate in the only worthwhile thread on OTChat once in a while. I might participate here a bit more often if you could make real threads, about exciting things like rare earth utilization rather than just what millenial trend or islamist sentiment Fox has taught you to piss your pants over this week.
Post a New Response

(1452172)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence
Posted by bingbong* on Mon Jul 31 12:13:47 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jul 31 10:48:09 2017.* Protip:You need to make an actual point before it can be discussed. Quoting long dismissed antique rhetoric does not make a point. Quoting constitutions of nations that no longer exist outside of an archaeological context does not make a point. In fact, you disprove your original assertion in doing so.
Post a New Response

(1452175)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence
Posted by bingbong* on Mon Jul 31 12:19:29 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 31 11:11:25 2017.* Not really. There's still very few places where real pay equity exists.
Post a New Response

(1452176)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by AlM* on Mon Jul 31 12:24:53 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error), posted by WillD on Mon Jul 31 11:53:44 2017.* The elevation of Las Cruces NM, which is on the Rio Grande, is 3,900'. So most of the elevation gain, going east to west, would be along the Rio Grande. The Continental Divide in southern NM isn't that much higher than Las Cruces (maybe another 1,000'). So if you wanted to kill off NM's and southern TX's agriculture, you could come up with the water. Or sure, what the hell, pump sea water up the hill.
Post a New Response

(1452181)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by LuchAAA* on Mon Jul 31 12:44:32 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error), posted by WillD on Mon Jul 31 12:12:32 2017.* Fox WilolD!!!! You're another funny guy. I don't watch Fox News(I assume you mean FNC and not Fox Sports or Fox over-the-air broadcast).
Post a New Response

(1452182)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by bingbong* on Mon Jul 31 12:50:29 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error), posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jul 31 12:44:32 2017.* Instead you watch Alex Jones.
Post a New Response

(1452183)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by LuchAAA* on Mon Jul 31 12:55:56 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error), posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 31 12:50:29 2017.* bingbong How much do you weigh? Do you need to lose some weight? How do you feel about #fatfeminism ??? I do not watch Alex Jones. WilolD is wrong. I thread about Irish-Catholic behavior, and do gloat a bit about Brentwood becoming a mainstream story after I've been warning about that trend for years.
Post a New Response

(1452184)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by WillD* on Mon Jul 31 13:01:40 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error), posted by AlM on Mon Jul 31 12:24:53 2017.* The elevation of Las Cruces NM, which is on the Rio Grande, is 3,900'. Google Earth's elevation profile shows several peaks in excess of 6000', in particular north of El Medio, Mexico, and in the range between Nogales, Mexico and Douglas, NM. The higher elevations tend to be on the north side of the border, so it'd be more problematic to build away from the border. One could cut through the mountains, but getting anywhere near the elevation of Las Cruces would be a geotechnical nightmare. So if you wanted to kill off NM's and southern TX's agriculture, Pretty sure they use a lot of groundwater for irrigation. That isn't going to be particularly useful for filling Olog's canal as it'd have to be pumped as well. But I suppose once it's laden with frack chemicals there won't be much other use for it so it might as well be put to some other use. Or sure, what the hell, pump sea water up the hill. So long as we're considering a ridiculous proposal we might as well consider everything. I'm a bit surprised that there's only 4177MW of hydroelectric generating capacity on the lower Colorado to Glen Canyon at 3700'. So we're likely talking less than 10GW to get seawater to Las Cruces, and less than 20GW to the highest point. It almost sounds doable when put like that.
Post a New Response

(1452185)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by WillD* on Mon Jul 31 13:05:28 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error), posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jul 31 12:44:32 2017.* I was giving the benefit of the doubt. It's not like you'd actually admit to listening to some radio personality like Prager or Medved, right?
Post a New Response

(1452186)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by Dyre Dan* on Mon Jul 31 13:11:53 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error), posted by WillD on Mon Jul 31 11:53:44 2017.* The Colorado is already diverted north of the U.S./Mexico border. At the border, it is usually just a dry riverbed.
Post a New Response

(1452188)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by LuchAAA* on Mon Jul 31 13:15:16 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error), posted by WillD on Mon Jul 31 13:05:28 2017.* WilolD! Yes, I have linked to Prager's movie "Safe Spaces". It gives me pleasure to see Brentwood in the spotlight after I've been threading about that place for years. I'm more concerned with #fatfeminism and Irish-Catholicism than anything I've heard on Prager. People who always bring up Fox are mostly cuckolds.
Post a New Response

(1452190)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by AlM* on Mon Jul 31 13:24:28 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error), posted by WillD on Mon Jul 31 13:01:40 2017.* Google Earth's elevation profile shows several peaks in excess of 6000', in particular north of El Medio, Mexico, and in the range between Nogales, Mexico and Douglas, NM. The higher elevations tend to be on the north side of the border, so it'd be more problematic to build away from the border. One could cut through the mountains, but getting anywhere near the elevation of Las Cruces would be a geotechnical nightmare. Any number of images you get if you Google New Mexico Elevation Map show routes through southern NM that stay under 5000'. Actually, the bigger problem would be California. You're below sea level in the Imperial Valley; then you have to build a staircase to get over the mountains, which again get close to 5000', to bring you to San Diego. There you have no choice but to pump water from sea level, whether from the Colorado River or from the Pacific Ocean. Though I suppose Olog would just use a bunch of A-bombs to blast away the mountain range between the Imperial Valley and the Pacific.
Post a New Response

(1452192)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by bingbong* on Mon Jul 31 13:26:35 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error), posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jul 31 12:55:56 2017.* bingbong That's my name here and you should continue to use. A sign of respect for internet privacy is required here as anywhere else on the net. Do bear in mind I know your real name too. Have I ever used it here? No. DO NOT use mine. How much do you weigh? None of pur business. Do you need to lose some weight? How do you feel about #fatfeminism ??? I do not know anyone that doesn't think, right or wrong, that they want to lose 5-10 lbs. weight obsession seems as American as the apple pie that we should be skipping. There are eighty supermodels on this earth. The remaining 4+billion women are never going to be one. It's long since time to lose this obsession. It is harmful to and objectifies women, an expression of hate that's been around for millennia. I do not watch Alex Jones. Sorry, you listen. WilolD is wrong. I thread about Irish-Catholic behavior, and do gloat a bit about Brentwood becoming a mainstream story after I've been warning about that trend for years. LOLuch!!!
Post a New Response

(1452194)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by AlM* on Mon Jul 31 13:37:17 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error), posted by Dyre Dan on Mon Jul 31 13:11:53 2017.* But since we're playing Olog fantasy here, the builder might as well purchase all the water used upstream for agriculture. That would only be a small portion of the cost of the canal.
Post a New Response

(1452205)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by bingbong* on Mon Jul 31 14:05:27 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error), posted by AlM on Mon Jul 31 13:37:17 2017.* Well if we're going full olog-fantasy here, why not use all the water that's supposedly on the moon? Just need a very very long garden hose. Gravity will take care of the rest. 😆 Agriculture won't be disturbed that way.
Post a New Response

(1452206)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the canal
Posted by Olog-hai* on Mon Jul 31 14:06:14 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error), posted by WillD on Mon Jul 31 11:53:44 2017.* on a more fundamental level where would the water to fill these locks sitting a mile up in a desert come from? Guess you never heard of aqueducts. Estimate how much of the Pacific and how much of the Gulf can go into a canal measuring 1,900 miles (and think of where water for China's Grand Canal, about 1,100 miles, comes from; lots of pumping stations).
Post a New Response

(1453019)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by WillD* on Thu Aug 3 04:25:57 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error), posted by AlM on Mon Jul 31 13:24:28 2017.* Any number of images you get if you Google New Mexico Elevation Map show routes through southern NM that stay under 5000'. Yes, but Olog appeared to want this canal to be a moat in his Anti-Central American Protective Rampart, so I chose a route close to the border. Going further inland would result in a no man's land between the border and the canal that would result in massive dislocation of US citizens on the US side of the border. Of course that's the supreme irony of all these border wall/fence/canal schemes. Actually, the bigger problem would be California. You're below sea level in the Imperial Valley; then you have to build a staircase to get over the mountains, which again get close to 5000', to bring you to San Diego. There you have no choice but to pump water from sea level, whether from the Colorado River or from the Pacific Ocean. At the very least setting up a siphon from the Pacific to the Salton Sea could be a good way to fix the problems with that artificial lake. It also could generate quite a bit of power, for a while. Mexicali is only something like 38 feet above sea level, so maybe we could get the Salton to sea level, pay Mexico to dig a canal past there and leave Olog's ACAPR to be a more conventional moat-less fence between San Diego and the Salton Sea.
Post a New Response

(1453021)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by WillD* on Thu Aug 3 04:51:03 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the canal, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jul 31 14:06:14 2017.* Guess you never heard of aqueducts. Guess you can't read. I mentioned aqueducts, but that does not make your Anti Central American Protective Rampart moat any more realistic.
Post a New Response

(1453045)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by AlM* on Thu Aug 3 08:43:42 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error), posted by WillD on Thu Aug 3 04:25:57 2017.* Going further inland would result in a no man's land between the border and the canal that would result in massive dislocation of US citizens on the US side of the border. Not many Americans live south of an under-5000' route across NM. Anyway, no more of an isolator than the Welland Canal. I don't know if they still have toll bridges across it, but when I was young I was indignant that you had to pay toll to cross something artificial.
Post a New Response

(1453809)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by DAND124* on Sat Aug 5 23:17:03 2017, in response to Ology of Terror III, posted by dANd124 on Thu Apr 2 19:22:45 2015.* Flake is no conservative though. So when one sees Republicans eating their own, it is the liberals on the conservatives, thus it is the liberals of the GOP sticking with the liberals in the Democratic Party. One of the plans of the communists, per The Naked Communist, was to take over the Democrats and Republicans. And by the time that book was first published (1958), the achievement of that goal was well under way
Post a New Response

(1453812)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by LuchAAA* on Sun Aug 6 00:32:24 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by DAND124 on Sat Aug 5 23:17:03 2017.* Bloomington, Minnesota
Post a New Response

(1453813)	view threaded
Re: Unemployment down to 4.3%
Posted by Olog-hai* on Sun Aug 6 00:37:49 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Aug 6 00:32:24 2017.* Exactly. And if the history of stuff like that plays out as usual, the cause would be internal. And his balls are nonexistent, otherwise he would debate that other "Olog" over on that other site.
Post a New Response

(1453815)	view threaded
Bloomington, Minnesota
Posted by LuchAAA* on Sun Aug 6 00:45:20 2017, in response to Re: Unemployment down to 4.3%, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Aug 6 00:37:49 2017.* The Left is emotionally invested in a white male Christian being responsible so they can blame Trump. And the only reason I care is because Bloomington was home of the Met Center, an arena that was famous in wrestling circles.
Post a New Response

(1453816)	view threaded
Re: Bloomington, Minnesota
Posted by Olog-hai* on Sun Aug 6 00:53:55 2017, in response to Bloomington, Minnesota, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Aug 6 00:45:20 2017.* It is a travesty what happened to the Metropolitan Sports Center.
Post a New Response

(1453832)	view threaded
Re: Bloomington, Minnesota
Posted by FYBklyn1959* on Sun Aug 6 09:27:27 2017, in response to Re: Bloomington, Minnesota, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Aug 6 00:53:55 2017.* Was it adjacent to the old Metropolitan Stadium? (home to the Twins and Vikings until 1982)
Post a New Response

(1453846)	view threaded
Re: Bloomington, Minnesota
Posted by Olog-hai* on Sun Aug 6 12:03:13 2017, in response to Re: Bloomington, Minnesota, posted by FYBklyn1959 on Sun Aug 6 09:27:27 2017.* Yes; the Mall of America is on the site of the Old Met, and the Sports Center became the overflow parking lot for the mall; now there's an Ikea in the latter's location.
Post a New Response

(1453849)	view threaded
Re: Bloomington, Minnesota
Posted by orange blossom special* on Sun Aug 6 12:45:50 2017, in response to Re: Bloomington, Minnesota, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Aug 6 12:03:13 2017.* The best Ikea I've been to. It's not full of retarded people taking their carts up the escalators(!!) to the showroom so they can drive around going the wrong way. I haven't been to an Ikea I could tolerate since
Post a New Response

(1453850)	view threaded
Re: Bloomington, Minnesota
Posted by FYBklyn1959* on Sun Aug 6 12:58:54 2017, in response to Re: Bloomington, Minnesota, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Aug 6 12:03:13 2017.* I guess the Sports Center is at the top of this image from 1979 (via Historic Aerials, I had to take a screenshot, as HA redid their site and I couldn't find a way to link). First time I am using ImageBam as a file host, hope it works!
Post a New Response

(1453948)	view threaded
Re: Bloomington, Minnesota
Posted by Catfish 44* on Sun Aug 6 23:31:58 2017, in response to Re: Bloomington, Minnesota, posted by FYBklyn1959 on Sun Aug 6 12:58:54 2017.* If you look close you can see the Purple People Eaters.
Post a New Response

(1454011)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Mon Aug 7 10:17:54 2017, in response to Ology of Terror III, posted by dANd124 on Thu Apr 2 19:22:45 2015.* Well, for that anyway. He [Harry S. Truman] was too scared of "starting a Third World War" to finish the job in Korea, sadly.
Post a New Response

(1454045)	view threaded
Re: 72 Years Ago Today
Posted by Olog-hai* on Mon Aug 7 12:40:23 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Aug 7 10:17:54 2017.* In the simplest of terms, what we are doing in Korea is this: We are trying to prevent a third world war. . . . We do not want to see the conflict in Korea extended. We are trying to prevent a world war—not to start one. The best way to do that is to make it plain that we and the other free countries will continue to resist the attack. But you may ask, why can’t we take other steps to punish the aggressor. Why don’t we bomb Manchuria and China itself? Why don’t we assist Chinese Nationalist troops to land on the mainland of China? If we were to do these things we would be running a very grave risk of starting a general war. If that were to happen, we would have brought about the exact situation we are trying to prevent. . . . Why do you not know history? This was one of the first instances of the communistic UN turning against the USA, in fact. And Truman completely lost his kojones.
Post a New Response

(1454049)	view threaded
Re: 72 Years Ago Today
Posted by Olog-hai* on Mon Aug 7 12:43:20 2017, in response to Re: 72 Years Ago Today, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Aug 7 12:40:23 2017.* Why? Calling MacArthur's actions "unauthorized". And defending Mao's regime.
Post a New Response

(1455526)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by DAnd124* on Sun Aug 13 23:49:51 2017, in response to Ology of Terror III, posted by dANd124 on Thu Apr 2 19:22:45 2015.* No; the communists love democracy. It’s the constitutional republic they hate. Even the Communist Manifesto says that the purpose of the “proletariat’s” rise to power is to “win the battle of democracy”.
Post a New Response

(1455527)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by DAnd124* on Sun Aug 13 23:54:19 2017, in response to Ology of Terror III, posted by dANd124 on Thu Apr 2 19:22:45 2015.* Deport to where? People like Brennan and Obama know too much. Risking them reaching Iran and aiding with their nuke program, or even aiding any other foreign power against the USA using their inside knowledge, can hurt our national security deeply. Problem exacerbated. Mahometans belong nowhere, so there is nowhere to deport them to. Except perhaps “Jahannam”.
Post a New Response

(1455529)	view threaded
Re: M.A.G.A.
Posted by Olog-hai* on Mon Aug 14 00:51:28 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by DAnd124 on Sun Aug 13 23:49:51 2017.* We have seen above that the first step in the revolution by the working class is to raise the proletariat to the position of ruling class to win the battle of democracy. The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralize all instruments of production in the hands of the State, i.e. of the proletariat organized as the ruling class; and to increase the total productive forces as rapidly as possible. Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property, and on the conditions of bourgeois production; by means of measures, therefore, which appear economically insufficient and untenable, but which, in the course of the movement, outstrip themselves, necessitate further inroads upon the old social order, and are unavoidable as a means of entirely revolutionizing the mode of production. That was written back in 1848, genius. Anyone can look that up. Guess you are a commie after all, and that's why you're frightened to debate that other "Olog" over on "FR".
Post a New Response

(1455531)	view threaded
Re: 40 Years Ago Today: Son of Sam apprehended
Posted by Olog-hai* on Mon Aug 14 00:53:30 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by DAnd124 on Sun Aug 13 23:54:19 2017.* Would you like everyone from Subchat to go over to that website for you, so they can all chase that other "Olog" for you? You're only making yourself look like an antisemite by keeping this up. People here already think you're nuts anyhow. That won't change.
Post a New Response

(1458756)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Tue Aug 22 11:21:36 2017, in response to Ology of Terror III, posted by dANd124 on Thu Apr 2 19:22:45 2015.* evolution is not real.
Post a New Response

(1458775)	view threaded
Re: Nature
Posted by Olog-hai* on Tue Aug 22 12:47:27 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 22 11:21:36 2017.* Never been proven. And you'll twist yourself in knots trying to find proof. This is always funny.
Post a New Response

(1458777)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Tue Aug 22 12:48:34 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Aug 22 12:47:27 2017.* LOL!
Post a New Response

(1458779)	view threaded
Re: Nature
Posted by Olog-hai* on Tue Aug 22 12:49:02 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 22 12:48:34 2017.* Thanks for not trying. That way, you won't be lying.
Post a New Response

(1461494)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Thu Aug 31 12:54:43 2017, in response to Ology of Terror III, posted by dANd124 on Thu Apr 2 19:22:45 2015.* There's been no bigot in the White House since January 20, 2017
Post a New Response

(1461497)	view threaded
Re: US summer box office suffers historic decline: less than $4 billion; down 16 percent
Posted by Olog-hai* on Thu Aug 31 13:01:25 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 31 12:54:43 2017.* Obama politicized the EEOC by making them collect wage info based on race and gender. Don't tell me that ain't bigoted, never mind a violation of privacy. Trump just reversed that. So you fail again.
Post a New Response

(1461506)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 31 13:56:20 2017, in response to Re: US summer box office suffers historic decline: less than $4 billion; down 16 percent, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Aug 31 13:01:25 2017. That's not bigoted and in any event, not relevant.
Post a New Response

(1461508)	view threaded
Re: Charlie Hebdo calls Texas victims of Hurricane Harvey "drowning neo-Nazis"
Posted by Olog-hai* on Thu Aug 31 13:59:16 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 31 13:56:20 2017.* Like hell it ain't bigoted, Spider-Nazi. A government power grab designed to make things unequal (basing things on race and/or "gender" versus merit) isn't bigoted, seriously? Way to bring the country down.
Post a New Response

(1463964)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Tue Sep 12 10:23:40 2017, in response to Ology of Terror III, posted by dANd124 on Thu Apr 2 19:22:45 2015.* And no, there aren't any violent "right wingers".
Post a New Response

(1463967)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by AlM* on Tue Sep 12 10:34:07 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Sep 12 10:23:40 2017.* Well of course not. Everyone knows Nazis and the KKK are left wingers. After all the Nazis were socialists and the KKK were Democrats.
Post a New Response

(1464242)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by DANd124* on Wed Sep 13 18:57:36 2017, in response to Ology of Terror III, posted by dANd124 on Thu Apr 2 19:22:45 2015.* No wonder Comrade Wilhelm doesn't want to cooperate with the vote fraud commission.
Post a New Response

(1464246)	view threaded
Re: Congratulations New York City
Posted by Olog-hai* on Wed Sep 13 19:10:14 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by DANd124 on Wed Sep 13 18:57:36 2017.* You saying De Blasio and Cuomo aren't one and the same? lol “New York refuses to perpetuate the myth voter fraud played a role in our election,” Cuomo said in June. “We will not be complying with this request.” But the governor said the commission scaled down its request. limiting it to information that anyone could get, so it was granted. The data provided included the names of voters, their dates of birth, party affiliation, addresses and how often they have voted. The board did not not turn over the last four digits of voters’ Social Security numbers, their driver’s license or non-driver identification numbers, a copy of their signatures or criminal histories. . . . Not real cooperation, is it. More like stalling. And they're still at it, dandKKK who likes to make excuses for Democrats.
Post a New Response

First : << [11]
< Previous Page	Page 11 of 11

[ Return to the Message Index ]