Re: Redistribution of Wealth

Re: Redistribution of Wealth (1278069)	Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10] >> : Last

< Previous Page

Page 10 of 11

Next Page >

(1442855)	view threaded
Re: Redistribution of Wealth
Posted by bingbong* on Mon Jun 19 08:30:37 2017, in response to Re: Redistribution of Wealth, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jun 19 00:18:17 2017.* Lulz. That's not going to happen. It would create a econmic disater for the city. Nobody wants to buy into a market where tax rates are so arbitrary. It goes against common sense. As to your picture, WTF? What are you trying to get at? Looks have nothing to do with politics. Intelligence does. Smarter people know hat their rights ar, and do not support those seeking to eradicate them. The only conclusion is that the young woman pictured didn't have the xperince to make good political decisions, and hopefully have aged ino them. That is one awfully old photo.
Post a New Response

(1442858)	view threaded
Re: Redistribution of Wealth
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Mon Jun 19 08:34:41 2017, in response to Re: Redistribution of Wealth, posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 19 08:30:37 2017.* Klutz.
Post a New Response

(1442936)	view threaded
Re: Redistribution of Wealth
Posted by Dave* on Mon Jun 19 16:08:36 2017, in response to Re: Redistribution of Wealth, posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 19 08:30:37 2017.* It's been photoshopped.
Post a New Response

(1442939)	view threaded
Re: Redistribution of Wealth
Posted by bingbong* on Mon Jun 19 16:11:31 2017, in response to Re: Redistribution of Wealth, posted by Dave on Mon Jun 19 16:08:36 2017.* I wouldn't doubt it.
Post a New Response

(1442941)	view threaded
Re: Redistribution of Wealth
Posted by LuchAAA* on Mon Jun 19 16:16:40 2017, in response to Re: Redistribution of Wealth, posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 19 08:30:37 2017.* yes, there is a relationship between a woman's looks and her politics. A woman's whose pussy is good for a $uccessful man is not political. But you have a generation of women who raise cats, are divorced and incapable of maintaining a relationship with a quality man and resent it. These women tend to like the Democrats.
Post a New Response

(1442944)	view threaded
Re: Redistribution of Wealth
Posted by LuchAAA* on Mon Jun 19 16:25:06 2017, in response to Re: Redistribution of Wealth, posted by Dave on Mon Jun 19 16:08:36 2017.* Dave. Is the heat getting to you? Trump looks like a middle-aged man with a barely legal Russian mail-order bride. But you gotta hand it to her, she saw her pussy as gold and got a very wealthy man to buy it.
Post a New Response

(1442972)	view threaded
Re: Redistribution of Wealth
Posted by Olog-hai* on Mon Jun 19 19:32:38 2017, in response to Re: Redistribution of Wealth, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jun 19 16:25:06 2017.* You have some misogyny problems.
Post a New Response

(1442977)	view threaded
Re: Redistribution of Wealth
Posted by bingbong* on Mon Jun 19 19:58:15 2017, in response to Re: Redistribution of Wealth, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jun 19 16:16:40 2017.* No no and no. You obviously do not know what women want, how to handle a relationship, or even what a "quality man" actually is. It's not what you think.
Post a New Response

(1443059)	view threaded
Re: Redistribution of Wealth
Posted by R2ChinaTown* on Tue Jun 20 16:24:19 2017, in response to Re: Redistribution of Wealth, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jun 19 16:16:40 2017.* Bingbong immediately comes to mind.
Post a New Response

(1443103)	view threaded
Re: Redistribution of Wealth
Posted by LuchAAA* on Tue Jun 20 20:53:29 2017, in response to Re: Redistribution of Wealth, posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 19 19:58:15 2017.* I know. Alt Right Nazi Patriarchy. Blah blah blah. Truth is, my post hits the nail on the head. Men are waking up to the ways of women. That's why women want open borders. They want to let men in who will put up with their shit or put them in their place.
Post a New Response

(1443158)	view threaded
Re: Redistribution of Wealth
Posted by Olog-hai* on Wed Jun 21 01:43:21 2017, in response to Re: Redistribution of Wealth, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jun 20 20:53:29 2017.* Alt Right Nazi Patriarchy Wow, the whole phrase is oxymoronic a number of times over.
Post a New Response

(1444053)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by DANd124* on Sat Jun 24 17:48:06 2017, in response to Ology of Terror III, posted by dANd124 on Thu Apr 2 19:22:45 2015.* Was naming a whole taxonomic animal order “Primates” a dig at Christian churches with archbishops that hold a rank of that name?
Post a New Response

(1444054)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by DANd124* on Sat Jun 24 17:50:33 2017, in response to Ology of Terror III, posted by dANd124 on Thu Apr 2 19:22:45 2015.* Those requirements show the Marxist nature of Medicaid at its beginnings. Pregnancy as a requirement is exemplary of Marxian “abolition of the family”. No government involvement in such matters should have ever ensued; private charity used to take care of that, and far more effectively.
Post a New Response

(1444066)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Sat Jun 24 19:33:04 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by DANd124 on Sat Jun 24 17:50:33 2017.* That one's a doozy.
Post a New Response

(1444067)	view threaded
Re: Rikers Island
Posted by Olog-hai* on Sat Jun 24 19:35:33 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by DANd124 on Sat Jun 24 17:50:33 2017.* You're pretty nutty still, eh? And it's not even a hot summer. Why won't you go over there and discuss it with him?
Post a New Response

(1444068)	view threaded
Re: List of Nones
Posted by Olog-hai* on Sat Jun 24 19:36:39 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by DANd124 on Sat Jun 24 17:48:06 2017.* Seriously, are you trying to out-wack JournalSquare-K-Car? You seem like an obsessed maniac off his meds.
Post a New Response

(1444078)	view threaded
Re: List of Nones
Posted by AlM* on Sat Jun 24 21:28:52 2017, in response to Re: List of Nones, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jun 24 19:36:39 2017.* It looks more like it's the other Olog-Hai who is off his meds.
Post a New Response

(1445738)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by dand124* on Tue Jul 4 09:28:54 2017, in response to Ology of Terror III, posted by dANd124 on Thu Apr 2 19:22:45 2015.* There is no evidence for evolution. Extinctions are extinctions. The theory itself is derived from old pagan beliefs, and Darwin intended it as an attack on belief in God. Unless it came from scripture, it has to be rejected as heresy—especially with the pagan connection.
Post a New Response

(1445739)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by AlM* on Tue Jul 4 09:30:42 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by dand124 on Tue Jul 4 09:28:54 2017.* There is no contradiction between believing the theory of evolution and believing in God.
Post a New Response

(1445761)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by Dave* on Tue Jul 4 11:47:58 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by AlM on Tue Jul 4 09:30:42 2017.* IAWTP.
Post a New Response

(1445766)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Tue Jul 4 12:04:09 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by AlM on Tue Jul 4 09:30:42 2017.* That is true, but I don't believe in a god or gods anyway.
Post a New Response

(1445774)	view threaded
Re: Happy Birthday USA
Posted by Olog-hai* on Tue Jul 4 12:53:17 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by dand124 on Tue Jul 4 09:28:54 2017.* So dandKKK is still crazy on the 4^th, I see. Full-tilt commie as well.
Post a New Response

(1445775)	view threaded
Re: Happy Birthday USA
Posted by Olog-hai* on Tue Jul 4 12:53:54 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by AlM on Tue Jul 4 09:30:42 2017.* Depends on the god.
Post a New Response

(1445777)	view threaded
Re: Happy Birthday USA
Posted by Olog-hai* on Tue Jul 4 12:57:40 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by Dave on Tue Jul 4 11:47:58 2017.* Guess you don't believe in the one in the Torah, then. The one who claimed to have created life and said nothing about evolving, which is a concept of the pagan goyim actually (Democritus and Anaximander particularly).
Post a New Response

(1445781)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Tue Jul 4 13:05:43 2017, in response to Ology of Terror III, posted by dANd124 on Thu Apr 2 19:22:45 2015.* Guess you don't believe in the one in the Torah, then. The one who claimed to have created life and said nothing about evolving, which is a concept of the pagan goyim actually (Democritus and Anaximander particularly).
Post a New Response

(1445837)	view threaded
Re: Happy Birthday USA
Posted by Dave* on Tue Jul 4 16:51:06 2017, in response to Re: Happy Birthday USA, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jul 4 12:57:40 2017.* Sorry, but you're incorrect. Judaism accepts all experimentally proven facts and observations of the theory of evolution. Those theories in evolution which have not been scientifically proven are not accepted by Judaism. The struggle between faith and evolution as espoused by Darwin was an issue with the Catholic Church, not Judaism. That's why in the 1940's, scientists modernized Darwin’s theory. They proposed fundamental changes and developed the modern theory of evolution, currently known as the neo-Darwinian theory.
Post a New Response

(1445845)	view threaded
Re: Happy Birthday USA
Posted by AlM* on Tue Jul 4 17:06:00 2017, in response to Re: Happy Birthday USA, posted by Dave on Tue Jul 4 16:51:06 2017.* The Catholic Church mostly dodged the issue until 1950, neither endorsing evolution nor saying it was wrong. It was mostly American Protestants who opposed evolution on religious grounds. William Jennings Bryan was not a Catholic.
Post a New Response

(1445852)	view threaded
Re: Happy Birthday USA
Posted by Fred G* on Tue Jul 4 17:45:48 2017, in response to Re: Happy Birthday USA, posted by AlM on Tue Jul 4 17:06:00 2017.* Probably go one tier further and point the finger at Baptists.
Post a New Response

(1445869)	view threaded
Re: Happy Birthday USA
Posted by Olog-hai* on Tue Jul 4 19:27:45 2017, in response to Re: Happy Birthday USA, posted by Dave on Tue Jul 4 16:51:06 2017.* Judaism accepts all experimentally proven facts and observations of the theory of evolution Since there are none, then Judaism ought not accept the theory. It is a bunch of conjecture formulated by pagans and there is no science behind it. The struggle between faith and evolution as espoused by Darwin was an issue with the Catholic Church, not Judaism Darwin did not say he "came to gradually disbelieve in the Catholic Church"; he said he "came to gradually disbelieve in Christianity" actually; Darwin had nothing to do with the Catholic Church, so I don't even know where you got that from (he was raised Anglican). And since the entire Tanakh is part of Christian scripture, he also had "an issue" with Judaism, like all left-wing theoreticians do. This particular quote of Darwin's is highly antisemitic: I had gradually come, by this time, to see that the Old Testament from its manifestly false history of the world, with the Tower of Babel, rainbow as a sign, etc., etc., and from its attributing to God the feelings of a revengeful tyrant, was no more to be trusted than the sacred books of the Hindoos (sic), or the beliefs of any barbarian. Redounds to the old "Jewish god is a tyrant" hatemongering. Besides all that, Darwin was one of the first, if not the first, in his era to contend the belief that "evolution" is compatible with belief in God.
Post a New Response

(1445894)	view threaded
Re: Happy Birthday USA
Posted by Dave* on Tue Jul 4 21:53:28 2017, in response to Re: Happy Birthday USA, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jul 4 19:27:45 2017.* Judaism accepts all experimentally proven facts and observations of the theory of evolution Since there are none, then Judaism ought not accept the theory. LMAO!
Post a New Response

(1445909)	view threaded
Re: Happy Birthday USA
Posted by Olog-hai* on Tue Jul 4 22:20:31 2017, in response to Re: Happy Birthday USA, posted by Dave on Tue Jul 4 21:53:28 2017.* Let's see the proof, then.
Post a New Response

(1446065)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by DAND124* on Wed Jul 5 18:14:33 2017, in response to Ology of Terror III, posted by dANd124 on Thu Apr 2 19:22:45 2015.* We don’t. The left does. Started way back when Lenin legalized homosexuality in his then-new USSR. And yes, using the word “pride” for shame is just typical leftist word inversion.
Post a New Response

(1450848)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Tue Jul 25 15:24:28 2017, in response to Ology of Terror III, posted by dANd124 on Thu Apr 2 19:22:45 2015.* Correct. Those that tout "democracy" see the word as a synonym for socialism, as Woodrow Wilson did.
Post a New Response

(1450898)	view threaded
Re: Schumer Throws Hillary Under The Bus
Posted by Olog-hai* on Tue Jul 25 19:25:55 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jul 25 15:24:28 2017.* The thesis of the state socialist is that no line can be drawn between private and public affairs which the State may not cross at will; that omnipotence of legislation is the first postulate of all just political theory. Applied in a democratic state, such doctrine sounds radical, but not revolutionary. It is only an acceptance of the extremest logical conclusions deducible from democratic principles long ago received as respectable. For it is very clear that in fundamental theory, socialism and democracy are almost, if not quite, one and the same. They both rest at bottom upon the absolute right of the community to determine its own destiny and that of its members. Men as communities are supreme over men as individuals. Limits of wisdom and convenience to the public control there may be: limits of principle there are, upon strict analysis, none. — Wilson, “Socialism and Democracy”, 1887 Feel like an idiot now? If not, then you're an even bigger one.
Post a New Response

(1450903)	view threaded
Re: Schumer Throws Hillary Under The Bus
Posted by AlM* on Tue Jul 25 19:36:11 2017, in response to Re: Schumer Throws Hillary Under The Bus, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jul 25 19:25:55 2017.* Olog: Those that tout "democracy" see the word as a synonym for socialism, as Woodrow Wilson did. Wilson, as quoted by Olog: socialism and democracy are almost, if not quite, one and the same Sorry. "Almost if not quite" is not a synonym for "synonym."
Post a New Response

(1450910)	view threaded
Re: Schumer Throws Hillary Under The Bus
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Tue Jul 25 20:16:51 2017, in response to Re: Schumer Throws Hillary Under The Bus, posted by AlM on Tue Jul 25 19:36:11 2017.* And in any event, his statement would still be wrong. Woodrow "Birth of a Nation" Wilson doesn't speak for everyone.
Post a New Response

(1452115)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Mon Jul 31 10:04:59 2017, in response to Ology of Terror III, posted by dANd124 on Thu Apr 2 19:22:45 2015.* Besides, that "pay gap" is a myth perpetrated by communists. Why else does the Red China constitution proclaim "equal pay for equal work" in its Article 48 (modeled after the USSR's constitution; Article 122 of the 1936 constitution and Article 35 of the 1977 constitution), a slogan Obama appropriated (and there was no shortage of Mao-lovers in his administration)?
Post a New Response

(1452120)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by AlM* on Mon Jul 31 10:08:17 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 31 10:04:59 2017.* Heh. We have to find an example where an avowed communist proclaimed that the internet is good. Then Olog wouldn't be allowed to use it.
Post a New Response

(1452138)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence
Posted by Olog-hai* on Mon Jul 31 10:39:26 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 31 10:04:59 2017.* There is no gender pay gap. Overdue you are at letting that fabrication die. As for the communist constitution articles in question, read on. Red China constitution, article 48: Women in the People's Republic of China enjoy equal rights with men in all spheres of life, in political, economic, cultural, social and family life. The state protects the rights and interests of women, applies the principle of equal pay for equal work to men and women alike and trains and selects cadres from among women. Obama parroted that very line in the linked speech and others. Article 122 of the 1936 USSR constitution: Women in the U.S.S.R. are accorded equal rights with men in all spheres of economic, state, cultural, social and political life. The possibility of exercising these rights is ensured to women by granting them an equal right with men to work, payment for work, rest and leisure, social insurance and education, and by state protection of the interests of mother and child, pre-maternity and maternity leave with full pay, and the provision of a wide network of maternity homes, nurseries and kindergartens. Article 36 of the 1977 USSR constitution: Women and men have equal rights in the USSR. Exercise of these rights is ensured by according women equal access with men to education and vocational and professional training, equal opportunities in employment, remuneration, and promotion, and in social and political, and cultural activity, and by special labor and health protection measures for women; by providing conditions enabling mothers to work; by legal protection, and material and moral support for mothers and children, including paid leaves and other benefits for expectant mothers and mothers, and gradual reduction of working time for mothers with small children. Ultimately anti-family and thus anti-society. Don't let your fingers get cancer by typing lies.
Post a New Response

(1452141)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Mon Jul 31 10:44:56 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jul 31 10:39:26 2017.* Whether or not the so-called "pay gap" exists is irrelevant. The "Ology" refers to your laughable citations to communist constitutions in order to argue against something that any reasonable person would favor (again, if true).
Post a New Response

(1452144)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence
Posted by Olog-hai* on Mon Jul 31 10:48:09 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 31 10:44:56 2017.* The "Ology" refers to your ~~laughable~~ citations to communist constitutions in order to argue against something that any reasonable person would favor IOW, you have nothing and are just trolling like an amateur. Don't be stupider than Nilet, now. There is nothing to argue against, and you even said so.
Post a New Response

(1452148)	view threaded
Re: Ology of Terror III
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Mon Jul 31 10:51:02 2017, in response to Ology of Terror III, posted by dANd124 on Thu Apr 2 19:22:45 2015.* I'd add a canal all the way from the Gulf of Mexico to the Pacific [along the present US-Mexico border]. We need something to compete with the canal in Panama that Carter stupidly gave away.
Post a New Response

(1452150)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence
Posted by bingbong* on Mon Jul 31 10:52:24 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jul 31 10:39:26 2017.* Yes there is. Especially among mddle management positions.
Post a New Response

(1452151)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence
Posted by Olog-hai* on Mon Jul 31 10:52:39 2017, in response to Re: Ology of Terror III, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 31 10:51:02 2017.* What's wrong with that? Nothing, as usual. You're making Nilet and streetcarman seem like rocket scientists, lol.
Post a New Response

(1452157)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence
Posted by AlM* on Mon Jul 31 11:10:13 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jul 31 10:52:39 2017.* What's wrong with that? The money?
Post a New Response

(1452160)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Mon Jul 31 11:11:25 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence, posted by bingbong on Mon Jul 31 10:52:24 2017.* The pay gap is overstated.
Post a New Response

(1452161)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Mon Jul 31 11:12:40 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence, posted by AlM on Mon Jul 31 11:10:13 2017.* The practicality. Who would want to traverse such a long canal with so many locks when the Panama Canal is much more efficient? Olog-hai thinks that the Erie Canal is state of the art.
Post a New Response

(1452162)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence
Posted by AlM* on Mon Jul 31 11:19:36 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 31 11:12:40 2017.* Yep. Way, way cheaper and quicker to improve ship to rail loading/unloading facilities at all the west coast ports and double track all the major cross-country rail lines. Oops. No longer off-topic.
Post a New Response

(1452168)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by WillD* on Mon Jul 31 11:53:44 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jul 31 11:12:40 2017.* That's an excellent point, but on a more fundamental level where would the water to fill these locks sitting a mile up in a desert come from? The Panama Canal's Gatun Lake is barely able to keep the locks supplied in a far more hospitable environment. You'd either have to divert a fair portion of the Colorado or Rio Grande's flow from around 500 miles to the north on aqueducts that would make California's system look puny (while leaving that state and its agriculture high and dry), or construct gigawatts of pumping capacity to lift seawater into mountains. But I suppose if you were installing that sort of generating capacity then desalination wouldn't be all that great an overhead expense.
Post a New Response

(1452170)	view threaded
Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error)
Posted by LuchAAA* on Mon Jul 31 12:04:21 2017, in response to Re: The left plays both sides of the fence (Was: Ology of [T]Error), posted by WillD on Mon Jul 31 11:53:44 2017.* WilolD!
Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10] >> : Last
< Previous Page	Page 10 of 11	Next Page >

[ Return to the Message Index ]