|
|
| Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' (1344047) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||
|
| (1344119) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 4 11:27:50 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Feb 4 06:32:10 2016. You're just a misogynist. |
|
|
| (1344120) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 4 11:28:29 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by TonyG on Thu Feb 4 11:26:19 2016. Didn't take you to be a misogynist. But if that's your reaction to these women, I have to wonder. |
|
|
| (1344123) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Feb 4 11:37:20 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 4 11:27:50 2016. How does pointing out that Islam isn't the only misogynist religion, make me a "misogynist"? |
|
|
| (1344133) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 4 12:11:01 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Feb 4 08:37:13 2016. Urganda is not a "Christian Nation". There is freedom of religion there.Compare to Islamic nations, where you cant be other religions. |
|
|
| (1344135) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 4 12:12:01 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by bingbong on Thu Feb 4 09:46:11 2016. We're not supposed to display or genitals to the world. Is that a problem????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? So women's genitals contain all but the eyes peaking through a woolen prison gown? |
|
|
| (1344136) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 4 12:13:23 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Feb 4 11:08:30 2016. Huh? |
|
|
| (1344137) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Feb 4 12:13:32 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by bingbong on Thu Feb 4 11:23:13 2016. Who's Rush Lardmouth? And who's Lulz? |
|
|
| (1344139) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Feb 4 12:34:21 2016, in response to Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of "gender apartheid", posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 4 01:27:16 2016. Don't go thinking you're some sort of progressive feminist because you have issue with this. Everyone should, though it's incredibly superficial. Cultural issues such as forced or arranged marriage are far more important, since that is the first issue that regards the equality of women. When a woman makes the call as to who her sexual partner is, it demonstrates her choices and desires are valid to her culture. How, when and with whom she starts a family is her fundamental human right. Take away any choice in this matter and its misogyny. |
|
|
| (1344140) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 4 12:36:19 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Feb 4 11:37:20 2016. Again, it's scale. You NEVER start a thread about how horrible Muslims treat gays, women, (or anyone for that matter), but rush when it's other than Muslims.The sheer brutality that Radical Islamics show people (all people) in general is just horrific. Where else do you see people being thrown off of buildings, stoned, burned alive, or the whole list of how they treat women. Yeah, I know, you will ATTEMPT to compare it by saying women can't be ordained. I mean really. |
|
|
| (1344142) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 4 12:40:58 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 4 12:36:19 2016. These women aren't even asking to become imams. It's not the same thing whatsoever as women not being rabbis or priests—which a lot of women insist must be male anyhow. |
|
|
| (1344146) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 4 12:46:29 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 4 12:40:58 2016. Yes, and again, it's not on the same scale as the ABUSE they get in Islam. |
|
|
| (1344147) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 4 12:48:14 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 4 12:46:29 2016. Not by far. |
|
|
| (1344148) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 4 12:49:29 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by bingbong on Thu Feb 4 12:34:21 2016. Yeah, and how is Islam working for women in that regard. Oh wait, they are too busy getting beaten, forced to stay in the house unless a male relative goes with her, and forced to wear a torture outfit which only allows her eyes to show.And it's not just the extremists either. Even if they have the scarfs that show their face, less "extreme" perhaps, but I remember a seemingly normal "American" Muslim talking about a house he bought, but they had to enclose the kitchen with doors to close (as opposed to open), as "if visitors came, they couldn't see his wife cooking in the kitchen". I mean really. |
|
|
| (1344149) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Thu Feb 4 12:49:56 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Feb 4 06:56:10 2016. Oh, and if I made a post about a "radical synagogue", I would almost immediately be branded an "anti-Semite", no?No, not necessarily. Depends what you would say in that post about this "radical synagogue". |
|
|
| (1344151) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Feb 4 13:04:45 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 4 12:36:19 2016. You NEVER start a thread about how horrible Muslims treat gays, women, (or anyone for that matter), but rush when it's other than Muslims.Standard OTChat behavior. Lots of people here are happy to start a thread when a fundamentalist American Muslim does something outrageous, but they don't care one whit when a fundamentalist Christian pastor in upstate NY beat two of his children to death because they weren't religious enough. And I don't see anyone here caring when Bhuddists in Myanmar or Hindus in India go on a religious rampage. |
|
|
| (1344152) | |
Bratton: Subways Are Not For Sleeping |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Feb 4 13:10:05 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by AlM on Thu Feb 4 13:04:45 2016. IAWTP. |
|
|
| (1344153) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Feb 4 13:24:07 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 4 12:12:01 2016. What I'm sqying is that is a matter of scale. Yes, I agree its wrong, but there are much more important fundamental aspects of human rights at play here that are being ignored, focusing on the superficial.Leave the arab-influenced regions and Islam has a much different look. That shit's cultural and superficial, especially when real fundamental rights do not exist. |
|
|
| (1344155) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Feb 4 13:28:21 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 4 12:49:29 2016. That's not Islam, its arab culture, or its influence. |
|
|
| (1344160) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 4 14:15:47 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by bingbong on Thu Feb 4 13:28:21 2016. And that's an excuse and makes that sick behavior okay? |
|
|
| (1344161) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 4 14:34:51 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Feb 4 06:54:12 2016. the same women crying "Islamophobia" against people against the Ground Zero mosque are the ones saying Islam is harsh against women.THIW |
|
|
| (1344162) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Feb 4 14:36:49 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 4 14:15:47 2016. No, its a fact and anyone that doesn't understand and make that distinction shouldn't be saying squat.Nor does it make it "okay". It isn't. But without the basic understanding of what its origins are will not make changing it possible. All saying and treating it as its origin is Islam does it retrench the hate. Taken in the true context of culture allows it to change, to end, as its adherents find the space to free themselves of it, without the burden of compromising what they personally deeply believe. As it stands today there's plenty in the Christian, western world that do not believe in equality for women, just look at some in this very country. Maybe we ought to clean up our own acts before condmning others. Give them an example to learn from. |
|
|
| (1344164) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 4 14:40:46 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by AlM on Thu Feb 4 13:04:45 2016. Standard OTChat behavior. Lots of people here are happy to start a thread when a fundamentalist American Muslim does something outrageous, but they don't care one whit when a fundamentalist Christian pastor in upstate NY beat two of his children to death because they weren't religious enough.And I don't see anyone here caring when Bhuddists in Myanmar or Hindus in India go on a religious rampage. If my Church some much as says something I don't like, I thread about it. |
|
|
| (1344165) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 4 14:48:20 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 4 14:40:46 2016. w1n/ |
|
|
| (1344167) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 4 15:00:46 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by bingbong on Thu Feb 4 14:36:49 2016. And none of those alleged ones that don't believe in "equality" of women, don't even come close to the vile things the Islamics do to women. |
|
|
| (1344169) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Feb 4 15:09:32 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 4 12:49:29 2016. That is really minor. |
|
|
| (1344172) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Feb 4 15:35:56 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 4 12:49:29 2016. I have a totally "normal" looking colleague (no head gear of any kind, etc.) who used to sit in the next cube over from me. She mentioned at one point that at a family member's wedding all the men would congregate together and all the women would congregate together, and they wouldn't mix.Do you consider that weird? |
|
|
| (1344175) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 4 15:46:13 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by AlM on Thu Feb 4 13:04:45 2016. And I don't see anyone here caring when Bhuddists (sic) in Myanmar or Hindus in India go on a religious rampage. . . because the media isn't reporting it correctly. I remember when they tried to make the Muslims in Bosnia look like the victims too. |
|
|
| (1344176) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 4 15:46:48 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 4 14:40:46 2016. Yeah, especially when it's something conservative and anti-abortion, right? |
|
|
| (1344180) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 4 16:04:52 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 4 15:46:48 2016. Yeah, especially when it's something conservative and anti-abortion, right?LOALM! No. I support abortion to lower crime. But it has it's drawbacks. It might increase crime because low income women have an abortion first, then eventually give life to kids. These women have emotional scars and end up being terrible mothers who are violent towards their kids and raise kids who have all kinds of issues. This theory was proposed to me by a white female uber-liberal college professor who herself had an abortion in the 80's. She's an emotional mess. So thanks for attacking Olog. Thanks for the w1n AlM. |
|
|
| (1344182) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Thu Feb 4 16:07:21 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 4 16:04:52 2016. No. I support abortion to lower crime. But it has it's drawbacksYou would probably be better off paying lower income at risk women to take more permanent and long term birth control to bypass some of the emotional issues that can sometimes come with an abortion. |
|
|
| (1344183) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 4 16:21:16 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Thu Feb 4 16:07:21 2016. You would probably be better off paying lower income at risk women to take more permanent and long term birth control to bypass some of the emotional issues that can sometimes come with an abortion.Your post went over my head. I'm the second dumbest person here behind Chimmy. That's why I'm gloating over a rare w1n vs. AlM today. AlM is one of the smartest guys here along with Olog-hai, Selkirk, Nilet, Spider-Pig, and SMAZZA30. But the feminists love abortions. Some think it's awesome to get pregnant and have an abortion as a women's rights issue. It was a badge of honor. Sometimes I'm in NY and see these women from the projects with their kids in public. Often these women yell at their kids in public and violently pull them. So I can only imagine what home life is like. It seems they save the most violent outburst for the boys, and it's no wonder there is so much dysfunction in the poor communities. The boys are being raised by crazy single moms who produce kids bound to repeat the cycle. |
|
|
| (1344184) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Thu Feb 4 16:25:05 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Feb 4 06:03:33 2016. Ah well ... as long as it keeps us from talking about the banksters that screwed all of us by doing Frye with "take my money!" to the Chinese and are now wondering why it's 2007 all over again at their hands.They COULD have invested in America. :( Gee, you're so quaint! One would think you wanted to turn the wayback machine to the 20th century! Now THAT's conservatism! :-) |
|
|
| (1344185) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Feb 4 16:32:50 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 4 15:00:46 2016. I'd drop the quotes. That just shows you're a misogynist. |
|
|
| (1344187) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Thu Feb 4 16:44:02 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Feb 4 11:08:30 2016. You're right. My bad.I apologize. |
|
|
| (1344189) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Thu Feb 4 16:48:40 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Thu Feb 4 16:07:21 2016. emotional issues that can sometimes come with an abortion.Those are a myth. |
|
|
| (1344190) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 4 16:54:22 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 4 16:04:52 2016. I support abortion to lower crimeThen you aren't against leftism. That is a lie spewed by leftist professors. |
|
|
| (1344192) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Thu Feb 4 17:02:16 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 4 16:21:16 2016. Your post went over my head.The better and less awkward solution to low income single mother births is to try to increase the use of long-term birth control. The benefit is that the women are less likely to forget to take their daily pill, and the women are less likely to succumb to their desire to get pregnant to keep a man*. It's slowly becoming "the solution" to various policy wonks with many expecting the end game that these women will delay pregnancy and become members of the middle class. Hell, the whole desire to secure free birth control under Obamacare was built with the understanding that more of these low income women would have access to long-term birth control. Often these women yell at their kids in public and violently pull them Some would argue that the mothers see the world around them, and they double down on such parenting techniques in order to keep their kids out of trouble. A few have argued that such behaviour isn't needed if the fathers were living with their children. FWIW, in my drunker moments, I'm tempted to argue that the appearance of traits from the father of the child may harbour some traumatic feelings in the women, and they may act out based on it. *or the inverse case where a man seeks to do the same to a woman. |
|
|
| (1344194) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 4 17:04:11 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Thu Feb 4 17:02:16 2016. Anything but promote the traditional family, eh? |
|
|
| (1344195) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Thu Feb 4 17:05:03 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by SMAZ on Thu Feb 4 16:48:40 2016. I've known some women to seem be unaffected by their abortions, and I've seen some who cry when recounting their experience, so while it's anecdotal, I'm not going to dismiss their reactions. |
|
|
| (1344196) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Thu Feb 4 17:08:27 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 4 17:04:11 2016. Anything but promote the traditional family, eh?The solution to promoting the traditional family is to shame single mothers, encourage abortions and long term birth control use, and prevent high concentrations of poor populations in neighbourhoods, overpay unskilled labour, and yes, engage in a high minded game of propaganda from the state from top to bottom to encourage all of this. |
|
|
| (1344197) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 4 17:18:01 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Thu Feb 4 17:08:27 2016. The solution to promoting the traditional family is to shame single mothers, encourage abortionsYou should be very angry at your teachers for making you doublethink. Do you know which was the first country in the 20th Century to come out with abortion on demand? Lenin's USSR. |
|
|
| (1344198) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Thu Feb 4 17:26:48 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 4 17:18:01 2016. You should be very angry at your teachers for making you doublethink.I'm a product of twelve years of Catholic schooling at the primary and secondary level. Try harder next time. :-) Do you know which was the first country in the 20th Century to come out with abortion on demand? Lenin's USSR. The Soviets built a large metro system in their capital and electrified their railways. So metro systems and railway electrification is wrong? |
|
|
| (1344199) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Feb 4 17:31:30 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Thu Feb 4 17:26:48 2016. That's ologic for you. |
|
|
| (1344203) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Feb 4 17:56:57 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by 3-9 on Thu Feb 4 16:25:05 2016. Heh. The Olog made me do it. :) |
|
|
| (1344204) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Feb 4 17:57:35 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Feb 4 12:13:32 2016. Both of them! :) |
|
|
| (1344205) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Feb 4 17:59:09 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Feb 4 11:08:30 2016. We had training on this ... it's "Xe, Xer, and Xers!" :) |
|
|
| (1344206) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 4 18:02:33 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Thu Feb 4 17:05:03 2016. did the women who had an abortion go on to become parents?I'd say overall, these women are fucked up to begin with and an abortion can only worsen, not better things for her. As for crime, well, NYC/ |
|
|
| (1344208) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Feb 4 18:03:36 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Feb 4 10:19:59 2016. Kvetch. :) |
|
|
| (1344215) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Thu Feb 4 18:21:44 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 4 18:02:33 2016. did the women who had an abortion go on to become parents?Some were parents already, some were not at the time, and went on to have more children. Others did not have children. All three groups had some degree of sadness about their decision. |
|
|
| (1344220) | |
Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'' |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 4 18:28:20 2016, in response to Re: Women In The World: Obama's visit to radical Baltimore mosque shows approval of ''gender apartheid'', posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Thu Feb 4 18:21:44 2016. Some were parents already, some were not at the time, and went on to have more children. Others did not have children. All three groups had some degree of sadness about their decision.Women are wicked, so I sometimes wonder how sad they are when they act and say they're sad. One Russian women I know had abortions in her country. She tried to kill herself but jumping into Flushing Meadows Lake. Now she's fat and alone in the world. I know the liberal college professor in Tampa. She's approaching 50, lives with her 24 year-old son and parents. A vegan who feeds stray animals. A white trash female from my Queens neighborhood. A cum dump since she was a teenager. My guess is that some upscale women have an abortion and get back on the cock carousel and resume with their careers. |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||