|
|
| Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'' (1295298) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 5 |
||
|
| (1295584) | |
Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Jun 23 00:47:41 2015, in response to Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'', posted by R30A on Tue Jun 23 00:23:28 2015. From here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Order_%28Nazism%29#Hitler.27s_plans_for_North_AmericaQuoted: Hitler's plans for North America Further information: Attacks on North America during World War II § German operations, Amerika Bomber, Consequences of the attack on Pearl Harbor and Zweites Buch Before completing the expected German conquest of Europe, the Nazi leadership hoped to keep the United States out of the war.[82] In an interview with an American magazine in the spring of 1941, Hitler stated that a German invasion of the Western Hemisphere was as fantastic as an invasion of the moon, and was a lie promoted by American big business hoping to gain from war profiteering.[83] American pro-Nazi movements such as the Friends of the New Germany and the German-American Bund played no role in Hitler's plans for the country, and received no financial or verbal support from Germany after 1935.[84] However, certain Native American advocate groups, such as the fascist-leaning American Indian Federation, were to be used to undermine the Roosevelt administration from within by means of propaganda.[85][86] In addition, the Nazis considered the Sioux, and by extension all Native Americans to be Aryans,[85] a theory echoed in the sympathetic portrayal of the Natives in German westerns of the 1930s such as Der Kaiser von Kalifornien. Nazi propagandists went as far as declaring that Germany would return expropriated land to the Indians, while Goebbels predicted they possessed little loyalty to America and would rather rebel than to fight against Germany.[85] As a boy, Hitler had been an enthusiastic reader of Karl May westerns[9] and he told Albert Speer that he still turned to them for inspiration as an adult when he was in a tight spot;[87] the Karl May westerns contained highly sympathetic portrayals of American Indians. Approximately nine months before the United States joined the Allies, U.S President Franklin D. Roosevelt made a reference to the New Order in a speech he gave on March 15, 1941: ...Nazi forces are not seeking mere modifications in colonial maps or in minor European boundaries. They openly seek the destruction of all elective systems of government on every continent, including our own. They seek to establish systems of government based on the regimentation of all human beings by a handful of individual rulers who seize power by force. Yes, these men and their hypnotized followers call this a "New Order." It is not new, and it is not order. For order among nations presupposes something enduring, some system of justice under which individuals over a long period of time are willing to live. Humanity will never permanently accept a system imposed by conquest, and based on slavery. These modern tyrants find it necessary to their plans to eliminate all democracies — eliminate them one by one. The nations of Europe, and indeed we, ourselves, did not appreciate that purpose. We do now.[88] Hitler actually held the American society in contempt, stating that the United States (which he consistently referred to as the "American Union") was "half Judaized, and the other half Negrified"[89] and that "in so far as there are any decent people in America, they are all of German origin".[90] As early as 1928, he had maintained that National Socialist Germany must prepare for the ultimate struggle against the USA for hegemony.[91] In mid-late 1941, as Axis victory against the USSR and Britain seemed certain, Hitler began planning an enormous extension of the Kriegsmarine, projected to include 25 battleships, 8 aircraft carriers, 50 cruisers, 400 submarines and 150 destroyers, far exceeding the naval expansion that had already been decided on in 1939's Plan Z.[92] Historian Gerhard L. Weinberg stated that this super-fleet was intended against the Western Hemisphere.[92] Hitler also considered the occupation of the Portuguese Azores, Cape Verde and Madeira and the Spanish Canary islands to deny the British a staging ground for military actions against Nazi-controlled Europe, and also to gain Atlantic naval bases for operations against North America.[93][94] Hitler desired to use the islands to "deploy long-range bombers against American cities from the Azores", via a plan that actually arrived on Hermann Goering's RLM office desks in the spring of 1942 for the design competition concerning such an aircraft.[95] In July 1941, Hitler approached Japanese ambassador Ōshima with an offer to wage a joint struggle against the USA[96] — Japan's own Project Z aircraft design program was one possible manner in which such a goal could be accomplished, all during the timeframe that the USAAC had itself, on April 11, 1941, first proposed a competition for airframe designs for the same sort of missions against the Axis forces, the Northrop XB-35 and the Convair B-36, flying directly from North American soil to attack Nazi Germany. In this final battle for world domination, Hitler expected a defeated Britain to eventually support the Axis forces with its powerful navy.[94] He stated that "England and America will one day have a war with one another, which will be waged with the greatest hatred imaginable. One of the two countries will have to disappear."[97] and "I shall no longer be there to see it, but I rejoice on behalf of the German people at the idea that one day we will see England and Germany marching together against America".[98] The actual physical conquest of the United States was unlikely, however,[99] and the future disposition of American territories remained cloudy in Hitler's mind.[100] He perceived the anticipated battle with that country, at least under his own rule, to be a sort of "battle of the continents" — possibly along the lines of then-contemporary American thought, such as the opening text from the second film in Frank Capra's Why We Fight series, illustrating one American viewpoint of what Hitler could have thought on such matters while viewing the crowds at the 1934 Nuremberg rally[101] — with a Nazi-dominated Old World fighting for global dominance against the New World, in which Germany would attain leadership of the world rather than establish direct control over it.[102] Further decisions down the line were left up to future generations of German rulers. Canada featured fairly little in Nazi conceptions of the post-war world. Because Hitler's political objectives were primarily focused on Eastern Europe before and during the war he considered the United States a negligible political factor in the world, while Canada interested him even less.[103] He politically grouped the country together with the United States in an American-dominated North America, and considered it equally as "materialistic, racially bastardized, and decadent" as its southern neighbour.[103] In 1942, when expressing his fear of an imminent collapse of the British Empire which he preferred to remain intact, Hitler believed that the United States would seize and annex Canada at the first opportunity,[104] and that the Canadians would be quick to welcome such a move.[103] This lack of policy direction from the top meant that Nazi politicians concerned with representing Germany's interests and relations with Canada had to resort to an improvised line of policy which they believed to be in accordance with Hitler's wishes.[103] The country was noted for its abundance of natural resources, and because of its great geographic size coupled with a low population density was characterized as "a country without people", in contrast to Germany which was considered "a people without space".[103] In his 1934 travelogue account of Canada, Zwischen USA und dem Pol (Between the USA and the North Pole), German journalist Colin Ross described Canadian society as artificial because it was composed of many different parts that weren't tied together by either blood or long-standing traditions (highlighting the differences between the French and English Canadians in particular), and that for this reason one could not speak of either a Canadian nation or Volk.[105] As a result the country's political system was also considered mechanic and non-organic, and that Ottawa did not constitute "the heart of the nation". Because of both these factors the Canadians were deemed incapable of comprehending "true culture", and German immigration in Canada was considered a mistake because they would be forced to live in an "empty civilization".[106] --- Now SOUTH America is a different story. Remember also that prior to the 1960's, most of the south was still a hot, humid shithole. Wasn't until all that federal money came in once Johnson was in office that major changes started happening throughout "Dixie." |
|
|
| (1295588) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Jun 23 02:15:15 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jun 22 21:22:42 2015. you glorify the Confederate flag and White Supremacy, yet I'm the anti-Semite. |
|
|
| (1295589) | |
Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'' |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Jun 23 02:17:26 2015, in response to Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'', posted by ntrainride on Mon Jun 22 21:42:55 2015. yeah me too.I hate that illustration. |
|
|
| (1295590) | |
Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'' |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Jun 23 02:19:50 2015, in response to Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'', posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jun 22 21:31:46 2015. i'll make sure to tell the JDL about that.Let me know when you buy it. |
|
|
| (1295592) | |
Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Jun 23 02:25:51 2015, in response to Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'', posted by SMAZ on Tue Jun 23 02:17:26 2015. Here's where it REALLY gets to suck. Those boxes? They're made by KEMII and imported from their Italian province of Ningbo, Zhejiang China. No joke. :(http://www.pizzaboxmanufacturers.com/ There's one major American manufacturer left, but they only do customs: http://www.starpizzabox.com/ |
|
|
| (1295600) | |
Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'' |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jun 23 04:18:50 2015, in response to Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'', posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Jun 22 23:52:55 2015. Yeah |
|
|
| (1295601) | |
Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'' |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jun 23 04:27:27 2015, in response to Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'', posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Jun 22 23:52:55 2015. Yeah |
|
|
| (1295602) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jun 23 04:40:16 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by SMAZ on Mon Jun 22 19:47:02 2015. The Washington Kikes? I'd hate to be Tom Brady playing them, as there would be multiple sacks during the game as they'll always get the quarterback!! LOL!! I'll be here all week folks! |
|
|
| (1295603) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Jun 23 05:29:02 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jun 23 04:40:16 2015. I'll be here all week folks!I'll make sure to notify Nilet of the wonderful news. |
|
|
| (1295604) | |
Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'' |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Jun 23 07:01:54 2015, in response to Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'', posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jun 23 04:18:50 2015. figures |
|
|
| (1295605) | |
Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'' |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Jun 23 07:02:05 2015, in response to Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'', posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jun 23 04:27:27 2015. figures |
|
|
| (1295606) | |
Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'' |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 23 07:10:12 2015, in response to Re: Walmart: ''No More items with Confederate Symbols'', posted by SMAZ on Tue Jun 23 02:19:50 2015. Not even the JDL, he follows the JTF. |
|
|
| (1295607) | |
Jews (Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage) |
|
|
Posted by Mitch45 on Tue Jun 23 08:01:48 2015, in response to A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by SMAZ on Sat Jun 20 17:10:29 2015. I wonder if this fellow, or any of his fellow bigots, realize that Gold's Gym was founded by Joseph Gold, a Jew from Los Angeles. |
|
|
| (1295608) | |
Jews (Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage) |
|
|
Posted by Mitch45 on Tue Jun 23 08:01:48 2015, in response to A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by SMAZ on Sat Jun 20 17:10:29 2015. I wonder if this fellow, or any of his fellow bigots, realize that Gold's Gym was founded by Joseph Gold, a Jew from Los Angeles. |
|
|
| (1295609) | |
Jews (Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage) |
|
|
Posted by Mitch45 on Tue Jun 23 08:01:48 2015, in response to A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by SMAZ on Sat Jun 20 17:10:29 2015. I wonder if this fellow, or any of his fellow bigots, realize that Gold's Gym was founded by Joseph Gold, a Jew from Los Angeles. |
|
|
| (1295610) | |
Jews (Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage) |
|
|
Posted by Mitch45 on Tue Jun 23 08:01:48 2015, in response to A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by SMAZ on Sat Jun 20 17:10:29 2015. I wonder if this fellow, or any of his fellow bigots, realize that Gold's Gym was founded by Joseph Gold, a Jew from Los Angeles. |
|
|
| (1295614) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Tue Jun 23 08:53:36 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by Jeff Rosen on Mon Jun 22 05:41:03 2015. I dunno, I'd read that it was Indians who were offended. I couldn't care less about the professionally offended as they're a cottage industry now.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1295617) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 23 09:29:19 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jun 22 19:54:55 2015. I want to add that the “Washington Redskins” were originally named “Boston Braves,” named after the baseball team that now plays in Atlanta. The name changed to Redskins when they moved to Fenway Park in 1933 after one season at Braves Field (they moved to Washington in 1937). The team owner was well-known racist George Preston Marshall,* so I’m not willing to give him the benefit of the doubt that it’s a respectful homage. Marshall was so racist that the Redskins were the last NFL team without a black player, and were only forced to sign one because their landlord was the federal government and they forced them.*Must be chicagomotorman’s hero. |
|
|
| (1295619) | |
Re: Jews (Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage) |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 23 09:34:16 2015, in response to Jews (Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage), posted by Mitch45 on Tue Jun 23 08:01:48 2015. Was Joseph Gold this guy: |
|
|
| (1295645) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Democratic Party Heritage |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jun 23 12:16:26 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Democratic Party Heritage, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jun 22 13:36:26 2015. How about this? |
|
|
| (1295646) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Democratic Party Heritage |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jun 23 12:17:00 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Democratic Party Heritage, posted by chicagomotorman on Mon Jun 22 18:36:50 2015. Take the last two letters off and you'll know. |
|
|
| (1295671) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Jun 23 14:48:28 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Jun 22 22:41:21 2015. How dare you compare the swastika to the Confederate flag. It's one thing for a gentile to make it, but a Jew? More proof you are a self hating Jew. |
|
|
| (1295672) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Jun 23 14:49:39 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by Fred G on Mon Jun 22 04:00:24 2015. I am not offending Indians. |
|
|
| (1295676) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 23 14:56:00 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Jun 23 14:48:28 2015. Why is the Confederate flag OK but the Nazi flag is not? Answer the question. |
|
|
| (1295678) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Tue Jun 23 15:16:06 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Jun 23 14:48:28 2015. How dare you compare the swastika to the Confederate flag.How about because they are both symbols of oppression, slavery, and murder? The death toll in the slave trade wasn't that much lower than Hitler's death toll in killing 40% of Europe's Jews. |
|
|
| (1295680) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Jun 23 15:28:27 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 23 14:56:00 2015. Why is the Confederate flag as bad as the swastika? YOU answer that question. |
|
|
| (1295681) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Jun 23 15:28:27 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 23 14:56:00 2015. Why is the Confederate flag as bad as the swastika? YOU answer that question. |
|
|
| (1295682) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Jun 23 15:30:42 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by AlM on Tue Jun 23 15:16:06 2015. Is your name WMATAGMOAGH? |
|
|
| (1295683) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 23 15:34:38 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Jun 23 15:28:27 2015. Seriously? You're the one vouching for the minority opinion, why don't you explain it to us?"Germans don’t use Nazi swastika flags to honor their dead from World War II. The same logic applies to the Confederacy, even if the Nazis’ sins were worse than those of Jefferson Davis and company." The Confederate flag is 'America's swastika' |
|
|
| (1295684) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Jun 23 16:07:09 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 23 15:34:38 2015. Slavery was wrong. No argument there. But for anyone, especially an alleged Jew to say that the Confederate flag is as bad as the swastika, where 6 million people, vast majority being Jews perished. I lost great aunts, great uncles, and many cousins whom I never met were lost in the holocaust.How dare you! HOW DARE YOU! YOU NO GOOD FUCKIN LOW CLASS PIECE OF SHIT! YOU HAVE DISRESPECTED MY FAMILY AND ALL THE JEWS THAT WERE MURDERED BY THE NAZIS! YOU ARE AN ASSHOLE OREN! YOU SHOULD BE EXCOMMUNICATED YOU TRAITOR! I AM NO LONGER CONSIDERING YOU A SELF HATING JEW, BECAUSE NO SELF RESPECTING JEW WOULD EVEN THINK OF COMPARING THE CONFEDERATE FLAG TO THE SWASTIKA! FUCK YOU OREN! MAY YOU ROT! |
|
|
| (1295685) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 23 16:18:22 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Jun 23 16:07:09 2015. You have yet to answer the question. I answered your question and you launched in to an irrational tirade, especially since you suggest that I haven't lost family in the Holocaust either (I most certainly did). |
|
|
| (1295688) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Tue Jun 23 16:22:56 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 23 16:18:22 2015. I think his answer was that since the Confederacy was less bad and not (specifically) against Jews, the Confederate flag is OK. |
|
|
| (1295695) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 23 16:49:01 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by 3-9 on Tue Jun 23 16:22:56 2015. If that his answer, it is a pretty shitty one. |
|
|
| (1295696) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Tue Jun 23 17:00:15 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 23 16:49:01 2015. Considering his general behavior here, it's to be expected. |
|
|
| (1295697) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Jun 23 17:01:16 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 23 16:18:22 2015. FUCK YOU! |
|
|
| (1295698) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Jun 23 17:02:17 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 23 16:49:01 2015. YOU'RE FULL OF SHIT! |
|
|
| (1295701) | |
Re: Jews (Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage) |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Jun 23 17:07:17 2015, in response to Jews (Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage), posted by Mitch45 on Tue Jun 23 08:01:48 2015. Don't you just love watching idiots? :) |
|
|
| (1295704) | |
Re: Jews (Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage) |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Tue Jun 23 17:14:01 2015, in response to Re: Jews (Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage), posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Jun 23 17:07:17 2015. Why do you think Jerry Springer, Maury Povich, etc., are/were so popular? :-) |
|
|
| (1295716) | |
Re: Jews (Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage) |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Jun 23 17:34:00 2015, in response to Re: Jews (Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage), posted by 3-9 on Tue Jun 23 17:14:01 2015. I always thought that it was because they didn't charge a penny for syndication fees to local stations, so they got snapped up like Rush Limbaugh who was also a no charge show. :) |
|
|
| (1295730) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Democratic Party Heritage |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jun 23 17:54:52 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Democratic Party Heritage, posted by chicagomotorman on Mon Jun 22 18:36:50 2015. SMAZZA lived in Astoria but now is in Italy.Only explanation why he won't #pizzasummit |
|
|
| (1295747) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Democratic Party Heritage |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Jun 23 18:47:14 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Democratic Party Heritage, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Jun 23 17:54:52 2015. Never heard of him. |
|
|
| (1295752) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 23 19:35:01 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Jun 23 17:01:16 2015. And you claim that I'm rude. |
|
|
| (1295757) | |
A Harmless Symbol of Democratic Party Heritage—and now Sales are Skyrocketing |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jun 23 19:51:31 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Democratic Party Heritage, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jun 22 13:36:26 2015. Is this what the libs really wanted??Business In Cider
|
|
|
| (1295766) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 23 21:04:23 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 23 19:35:01 2015. And he wonders why I wouldn't want to make meeting him in person a high priority... |
|
|
| (1295767) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jun 23 21:10:10 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 23 21:04:23 2015. I don't want to meet you either. Prick! |
|
|
| (1295768) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jun 23 21:12:07 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 23 21:04:23 2015. I don't want to meet you either. Prick! |
|
|
| (1295779) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Democratic Party Heritage—and now Sales are Skyrocketing |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Jun 23 22:12:08 2015, in response to A Harmless Symbol of Democratic Party Heritage—and now Sales are Skyrocketing, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jun 23 19:51:31 2015. it figures |
|
|
| (1295791) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Democratic Party Heritage—and now Sales are Skyrocketing |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Jun 23 23:31:58 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Democratic Party Heritage—and now Sales are Skyrocketing, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Jun 23 22:12:08 2015. Consider it a clearance sale. :) |
|
|
| (1295797) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Democratic Party Heritage |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jun 24 01:38:09 2015, in response to A Harmless Symbol of Southern Heritage, posted by SMAZ on Sat Jun 20 17:10:29 2015. Did you show him doing this? |
|
|
| (1295798) | |
Re: A Harmless Symbol of Democratic Party Heritage |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jun 24 01:54:09 2015, in response to Re: A Harmless Symbol of Democratic Party Heritage, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jun 24 01:38:09 2015. Don't really think there was a need to, he's quite clearly a republican. |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 5 |
||
