Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7]

< Previous Page  

Page 3 of 7

Next Page >  

(1147136)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 20 15:04:18 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 14:55:46 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
They exist for a reason. The reason being that for way too long the government solely worked for the intereast of white MEN. It is that history that makes the question invalid and those groups among the many you mentioned (no NOW?) legitimate.

Post a New Response

(1147138)

view threaded

Re: Pull the UniLever for the UniParty! (was Re: The UniParty's)

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jan 20 15:05:36 2014, in response to Re: Pull the UniLever for the UniParty! (was Re: The UniParty's), posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 14:59:21 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Alive and well and still thumping that bible at members of them unchristian religions. She's still running Anita Bryant Ministries International out of Edmond, Oklahoma.

Post a New Response

(1147140)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 15:11:17 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 20 15:04:18 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d


Post a New Response

(1147141)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jan 20 15:11:19 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 20 11:23:06 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
This is a guy who made multiple round trips to Skokie daily and doesn't get where his "customers" were at? :-\

Post a New Response

(1147142)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 15:12:07 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jan 20 15:11:19 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
They are passengers, not customers.

Post a New Response

(1147144)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jan 20 15:16:52 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 15:12:07 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
In the wily world of the MTA, they're called "customers" ... I'm waiting for the final decay of sanity when the MTA decides to call them "guests" ... lol!

Post a New Response

(1147147)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 15:24:55 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jan 20 15:16:52 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
So we do agree that passengers are passengers, and all that customer stuff is just a bunch of PC nonsense?

Post a New Response

(1147149)

view threaded

Re: The The GOP CRIMINAL NAZI party's uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Jan 20 15:38:25 2014, in response to Re: The The GOP CRIMINAL NAZI party's uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 14:58:16 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
It is falling on deaf ears it seems. Maybe you should be more outspoken about it, too.

Post a New Response

(1147150)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Jan 20 15:38:48 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 14:44:53 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
What? Too many inconvenient facts?

Post a New Response

(1147152)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jan 20 15:39:53 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 15:24:55 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Aw c'mon, bro ... we didn't call them passengers either. We called them GEESE because of all that squawking if you didn't take those curves all wrapped up at warp speed to get them there faster than the schedule. :)

Post a New Response

(1147153)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 20 15:43:33 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Jan 20 15:38:48 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Facts are the right-winger's kryptonite.

Post a New Response

(1147154)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 20 15:47:32 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 20 11:47:08 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Name one "nutball" who was deprived the presidency by the Electoral College.

I don't think you consider Samuel Tilden to be a "nutball."

Post a New Response

(1147155)

view threaded

Re: The UniParty’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 20 15:51:49 2014, in response to Re: The UniParty’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 14:43:44 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
If only there was any good work that he did.

You've read his posts, why do you still not realize that he is deeply disturbed?

Post a New Response

(1147156)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 20 15:54:32 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by AlM on Mon Jan 20 13:30:09 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
But it's not gerrymandering when these borders have been intact for well over a century. Longer in the case of the eastern states.

Post a New Response

(1147160)

view threaded

Re: The UniParty's uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by RockParkMan on Mon Jan 20 16:20:40 2014, in response to Re: The UniParty's uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jan 20 13:59:20 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
If the two parties really are the "UniParty" then why would they have a problem getting the electoral votes needed to install their choice of President???

Post a New Response

(1147162)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 20 16:23:50 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 20 15:54:32 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Of course not. That's why I put the word in quotes. It just has the same effect as gerrymandering without the current effect having been deliberate.




Post a New Response

(1147163)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 20 16:27:13 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 15:24:55 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Why is it PC to call them customers? That's what businesses call people whom they offer a service in return for payment.



Post a New Response

(1147166)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 16:49:09 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Jan 20 15:38:48 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Look, you're not going to convince me, and I am not going to convince you. But I'll leave you with this, up until 5 years, I was indifferent towards mu Jewish heritage. After ready up on Meir Kahane, brought me to apreaciate my Jewish roots, and made me more proud to be a Jew. I suppose you would rather that I go back to that?

Post a New Response

(1147170)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 16:57:33 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jan 20 15:39:53 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
CTA, Cattle Transit Authority or Cover Thy Ass.

Post a New Response

(1147171)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 20 16:57:43 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 16:49:09 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Your Jewish identity is based on hatred. That is worse than being ignorant or indifferent.

Post a New Response

(1147175)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Jan 20 17:06:45 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 16:49:09 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I'm hesitant to say yes, I need to think about it more. I tend to believe that religion is personal and one needs to do what is best for himself or herself. But once one crosses the line to the point they use religion as a basis for hatred, I tend to think differently, and especially when it is my own religion that is being used as a grounds for fermenting the hatred of others. Kahanism is over that line for me. The question is whether you are as well.

Post a New Response

(1147176)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 17:13:59 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Jan 20 17:06:45 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I am proud to be Jewish, I love being Jewish. I have no problem with other groups as long as they respect our right to exist in Israel.

Post a New Response

(1147177)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jan 20 17:18:01 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Jan 20 17:06:45 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
are you Jewish in terms of religion or are you "Jewish Identity" like Larry David and Woody Allen?

I find the American Jewish population is changing fast. American Jews, the stereotypical JAP never had kids. Today's younger Jewish population is immigrant, unless they're uber religious like Terrapin Station.

On my end, I miss the JAP. To me, they were always more interesting than the Guidettes or Rockhead types I knew in my Christian neighborhood in Queens. But American Jews really didn't replace themselves. They didn't have enough kids and they're becoming extinct.

Post a New Response

(1147178)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jan 20 17:34:15 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 09:05:54 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Isn't her son-in-law Jewish?

http://www.jcfhw.org/

Jewish Center in Middle Village

So, this congregation uses Forest Hills in their name.

But they're in Middle Village. There is no such thing as "Forest Hills West".

It's possible that when the congregation was formed, people did refer to that area as "Forest Hills West".

My theory is that they use Forest Hills in their name for credibility. Forest Hills is well-known for it's Jewishness.

In the about us section, they point out the neighborhood is no longer Jewish. But I do remember when some Jewish families still lived there.

Post a New Response

(1147180)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 20 17:44:10 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 20 15:47:32 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Just because there hasn't been one yet doesn't mean there won't be.

Post a New Response

(1147182)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 20 18:00:03 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 20 17:44:10 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
And how do you expect the electoral college would prevent such a thing? If anything it would make it more likely by allowing someone to be elected with a small percentage of the vote by carrying the small states.

Post a New Response

(1147183)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 18:24:38 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jan 20 17:18:01 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Don't even think of comparing me to those Hollywood, evil liberal self hating Jews. Especialy that pig no talent Woody Allen.

Post a New Response

(1147184)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 20 18:26:05 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 20 18:00:03 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Each and every elector can choose or change their vote. That they haven't is just a matter of decent behavior on their part. I would hope that if someone managed to get through an election while having designs on upending our democracy, let's say for an example, to establish a "Christian Taliban" nation, the electors would be out last chance to prevent that from happening.

Post a New Response

(1147185)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 18:30:23 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jan 20 17:34:15 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I'm not from New York. You know the geography better than me. So her son in law is supposedly Jewish. So what. Most U.S. Jewish polititians are democrats, and therefore are self hating Jews.

Post a New Response

(1147186)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jan 20 18:33:07 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 20 15:47:32 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You're right.

But I wonder if there are people who stay home because they feel their vote "doesn't count" in some states?



Post a New Response

(1147188)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 20 18:52:53 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 18:30:23 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Being a Democrat != Self Hating Jew

Yes there are a number of Democrats who I feel give too much support to those that seek the destruction of Israel, but on other issues of their platform the Democrats are much closer /than the Republicans to what is in the Torah. For example, the Torah would not support the Republican position on taxes and social services

Post a New Response

(1147189)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by cortelyounext on Mon Jan 20 18:59:55 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jan 20 18:33:07 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You are going to relocate to the Forest Park/Richmond Hill section of Queens along 116th between Myrtle and Metropolitan Avenue, the largest Sikh community in New York City. There are also scattered pockets of Caribbean Americans which is going to be a problem since you hate Dominican women. After settling down in Queens you are going to become a registered Democrat which is something I still cannot understand. I saw you demolished SMAZ back in December in a thread something about High-Rise apartments and the attendant gentrification in Long Island City or something like that.

Post a New Response

(1147190)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 20 19:13:18 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 20 18:52:53 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
There is definitely the left wing group that automatically considers any have-nots to be guilt-free while the haves are total oppressors. For them, Israel is uniformly terrible because they do not always treat the Palestinians with perfect justice and kindness.

But what's happened to the large number of establishment Republicans who favored Saudi or similar interests over Israeli ones for decades? It's pretty clear they have just learned to keep their mouths shut because they don't want to offend their anti-Islamic fundamentalist base. But there's no way the Republican establishment would ever support an Israel that adopted the kinds of polices CMM wants to see.





Post a New Response

(1147191)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by Fred G on Mon Jan 20 19:18:06 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jan 20 06:09:38 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The myth of a divisive Obama. It's not working except among those who hate Obama anyway.

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(1147193)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 20 19:20:14 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jan 20 05:13:20 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The main thing the Dems have going for them is the ability to divide people by race and gender followed by education

Education? Are the Democrats the party of the well educated or the uneducated? I would think they have strong support among both.



Post a New Response

(1147197)

view threaded

Re: The UniParty's uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jan 20 19:53:18 2014, in response to Re: The UniParty's uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 20 14:28:00 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
How could there be a functioning DNC, if, as you characterize, American politics is run through "The UniParty"?

Don't be silly. The establishment GOP works with the Democrats including the DNC. All for the same goals. Rhetoric is meaningless.

And don't tell two lies in a row. I never deny changing thread titles when I do it.

Post a New Response

(1147199)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 20 20:08:07 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 20 18:26:05 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
If the people are insane enough to want that, the electors won't stop that.

In 224 years, faithless electors have never had any effect.

Post a New Response

(1147200)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 20 20:11:25 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 20 18:26:05 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
If a candidate ran on a Christian Taliban platform and won, his electors would support that platform too.


Post a New Response

(1147201)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 20 20:21:23 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by AlM on Mon Jan 20 20:11:25 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Absolutely. The party nominating him would see to it that his pledged electors are loyalists.

Post a New Response

(1147206)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jan 20 20:30:52 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by AlM on Mon Jan 20 16:27:13 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Nah ... the current MBA phrase is "guest." As though they break out the fine china or some such. :)

Post a New Response

(1147209)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jan 20 20:38:21 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jan 20 16:57:33 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I remember reading that back before either of us was born, back when the stockyard was still hopping, CTA actually DID haul cattle here and there. :)

Post a New Response

(1147212)

view threaded

Re: The UniParty's uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jan 20 20:49:24 2014, in response to Re: The UniParty's uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jan 20 19:53:18 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
If that were true though, then we'd have judges, agency heads and a budget.

Post a New Response

(1147214)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jan 20 20:54:54 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by Fred G on Mon Jan 20 19:18:06 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I should have said polarizing. He's a polarizing figure.



Post a New Response

(1147216)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jan 20 21:02:28 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by AlM on Mon Jan 20 19:20:14 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Education? Are the Democrats the party of the well educated or the uneducated? I would think they have strong support among both.

I'd say they do better with the intellectuals and pseudo-intellectuals.

Legit high IQ people like Spider-Pig, SMAZZA, Easy, RIPTA, Stephen Bauman tend to support the Democrats largely in part because they look down on people they see as intellectually inferior.

Pseudo-intellectuals are my white trash Democrat friends from Queens who vote Democrat but hate the homeless and write stupid letters to local newspapers.


Post a New Response

(1147217)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 20 21:03:03 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 20 20:21:23 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Not necessarily. Every state has a few "freelance" electors. They aren't signed on to anyone.

Post a New Response

(1147218)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by Fred G on Mon Jan 20 21:04:29 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jan 20 20:54:54 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Yeah that I can buy. He's polarizing. So is Eric Cantor or Nancy Pelosi, etc, anybody who's on a side.

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(1147219)

view threaded

Re: The UniParty's uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 20 21:07:23 2014, in response to Re: The UniParty's uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jan 20 19:53:18 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
This isn't silly, though your changed subject is. Compromise is very different than a "uniparty", which brings forth images like Soviet-era Russia. if you can't deal with it, find another country.

And yes, you will deny changing this thread subject same as all the other ones you do. Constantly. Annoyingly, and sending the conversation way off base. If you want another discussion, start another thread.

Post a New Response

(1147220)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 20 21:08:43 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 20 20:08:07 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
That may change someday.

Post a New Response

(1147221)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 20 21:08:46 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 20 21:03:03 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Really?

Post a New Response

(1147222)

view threaded

Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016

Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Jan 20 21:13:45 2014, in response to Re: The Republican Party’s uphill path to 270 electoral votes in 2016, posted by cortelyounext on Mon Jan 20 18:59:55 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You are going to relocate to the Forest Park/Richmond Hill section of Queens along 116th between Myrtle and Metropolitan Avenue, the largest Sikh community in New York City.

No. I've decided to focus on Yellowstone and Juno. Nice area for now.

The Sikhs are down by Lefferts and Liberty. 116 between Myrtle and Metropolitan is still very very Jewish.

There are also scattered pockets of Caribbean Americans which is going to be a problem since you hate Dominican women.

Which is why ChrisR16 left the Jamaica Avenue corridor. But I don't hate Dominican women. I only said I prefer South and Central American women over Caribbean women. That's ain't hate.

After settling down in Queens you are going to become a registered Democrat which is something I still cannot understand

It's easy to understand. For my safety I'll register as a Democrat. Liberals are violent and vindictive so I'll just register as a D to avoid problems.

I saw you demolished SMAZ back in December in a thread something about High-Rise apartments and the attendant gentrification in Long Island City or something like that.

SMAZZA l0st. The "income" housing units are probably open by now.

In 2014 I beat WMATAGMO and Easy and I'll say danD124. dand124 goes on and on about cops and did not thread about the not guilty verdict for the cops involved with the homeless man who died. That's a loss for dand124.

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7]

< Previous Page  

Page 3 of 7

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]