|
|
| Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) (101800) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 8 of 9 |
||
|
| (102805) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by New Brunswick Station on Thu Mar 2 14:32:37 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 14:21:56 2006. So women have glands inside their private parts. the point being? the gushers come from deeper parts. |
|
|
| (102806) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Mar 2 14:40:05 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 12:16:30 2006. What's that got to do with 2 creatures having sex? I'm not buying into any argument about natural v unnatural. That's just your phobia.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (102807) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 14:49:42 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by New Brunswick Station on Thu Mar 2 14:32:37 2006. The point being, natural lubrication thereof. Nothing like that in rear . . . |
|
|
| (102808) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 14:55:00 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Fred G on Thu Mar 2 14:40:05 2006. Assisting penetration, assisting climax, stuff like that. You've seen anal penetration among non-human creatures . . . ? PS. I don't have a phobia. Humans are capable of thinking; and they think up stuff like using ointments, lard, Kentucky Jelly . . . whatever floats their boat, right? |
|
|
| (102809) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by New Brunswick Station on Thu Mar 2 15:04:09 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 14:49:42 2006. w/e. Sex involves intimate rubbing and contact with sensitive organs, regardles of any fluids involved. |
|
|
| (102820) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 16:05:15 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by New Brunswick Station on Thu Mar 2 15:04:09 2006. Regardless . . . ? Now you're making me think that U R a virgin . . . |
|
|
| (102839) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Mar 2 17:41:45 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 14:55:00 2006. Uncircumcised men don't need those products. And you forgot whale oil.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (102840) | |
Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Buffer on Thu Mar 2 17:50:30 2006, in response to Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance, posted by Peter Rosa on Mon Feb 27 10:00:01 2006. Stem cell - For, depending on where the stem cells are obtained. Gun control - For, with limits. Abortion choice - Against the "let me get rid of it and get back to the dance floor" abortions. For in all cases of rape, incest, possible death the mother, or if it's a crack baby. Federal healthcare - Neutral. Port sale - Against!!! Social Security reform - For. Morning after - For. Gay marriage - Against, but civil unions should get the same benefits. Public smoking ban - Against. Patriot Act - For. Creation in schools - Against. However the idea that a higher power could have had some impact on creating the universe, I am for. Motorcycle helmets - For, although I really don't care too much. -James |
|
|
| (102841) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 17:55:25 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Fred G on Thu Mar 2 17:41:45 2006. Uncircumcised men don't need those productsI'm uncircumcised and I can't enter a back door without 'em . . . |
|
|
| (102843) | |
Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance (NEW: Dubya deal w/ India) |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Thu Mar 2 17:58:23 2006, in response to Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance (NEW: Dubya deal w/ India), posted by New Brunswick Station on Thu Mar 2 10:20:14 2006. Your decision is really for or against Bush.Clinton and earlier, India was our Ally, Pakistan was someone to be wary of. Bush and later, India can't even be located on the map or spelled, but amazingly a fanatical country headed by a non-democratic coup is now our best ally, with the same access to the US as NATO. India, the people in it, aren't really liking Bush or his visit there. And as a British Colony, they have more in common with us than Pakistan. |
|
|
| (102848) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Mar 2 18:09:48 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 17:55:25 2006. Ok, well there's one who can't. So I guess that applies to all.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (102851) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 18:27:17 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Fred G on Thu Mar 2 18:09:48 2006. You sound like you're an expert in this area . . . care to share the secret? |
|
|
| (102855) | |
Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance (NEW: Dubya deal w/ India) |
|
|
Posted by New Brunswick Station on Thu Mar 2 18:30:39 2006, in response to Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance (NEW: Dubya deal w/ India), posted by Orange Blossom Special on Thu Mar 2 17:58:23 2006. Your decision is really for or against Bush.Clinton and earlier, India was our Ally, Pakistan was someone to be wary of. Bush and later, India can't even be located on the map or spelled, but amazingly a fanatical country headed by a non-democratic coup is now our best ally, with the same access to the US as NATO. I like some of Bush's policies but not others. He can be incredibly boneheaded at times (remember Harriet Miers?), but he shows signs of intelligence at others (at least getting around to blabbering about reducing oil dependence, something that came to me as something he was kinda forced to do, and the idea of getting back to India). Maybe he's still a "pushover" at heart. Question: since when was Pakistan "our best ally"? I can name countries friendlier with America than Pakistan is (well, over a period of the past several years): Israel (which has a longterm alliance with US) Canada (of course) and Mexico (which got friendlier after the Fox election, I think) Japan and South Korea (thank you, Macarthur and Co. - note: there has been an economic rivalry going on between America and the Asians, but this mostly plays out in the realm of business politics, rather than military politics, and so far seems to be friendly, some grousing over the Second World War and its causes notwithstanding.) Great Britain (I'll bet speaking of English has something to do with this) Several small Caribbean countries (dependent on US economy in large measure, thanks to floating oceangoing palaces and relatives sending money "back home") Australia and New Zealand (English-speaking) |
|
|
| (102856) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Thu Mar 2 18:31:45 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 17:55:25 2006. WAAAAAAAAAAAAAY too much information. |
|
|
| (102860) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Thu Mar 2 18:32:20 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Olog-hai on Wed Mar 1 22:32:22 2006. W T F . . . |
|
|
| (102864) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Mar 2 18:36:41 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 18:27:17 2006. If I did, it wouldn't be a secret, would it?your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (102878) | |
Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance |
|
|
Posted by xtimx on Thu Mar 2 19:31:17 2006, in response to Subtalk politics: at a glance, posted by aem7ac on Mon Feb 27 09:45:15 2006. Stem cell - absolutely proGun control - pro, within limits Abortion choice - completely pro Federal healthcare - pro if managed well. europe does it well. Port sale - against Social Security reform - if we don't reform it its done within 5 years Morning after - pro, its not anywhere near a life. Gay marriage - 110% pro. love is love. let them have the same benefits as straight people Public smoking ban - greatest thing ever Patriot Act - completely against Creation in schools - keep your god at church, we'll have facts in schools thank you Motorcycle helmets - i am more into shirts that say "if you can read this, the bitch fell off" |
|
|
| (102897) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by Peter Rosa on Thu Mar 2 21:44:29 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 18:27:17 2006. Fags use Crisco.My LIRR/NYCT blog |
|
|
| (102901) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 22:03:09 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Peter Rosa on Thu Mar 2 21:44:29 2006. Sounds like an inside secret there . . . |
|
|
| (102903) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Mar 2 22:14:32 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Peter Rosa on Thu Mar 2 21:44:29 2006. Cuz there's a woman shortage?your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (102906) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Thu Mar 2 22:19:14 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Peter Rosa on Thu Mar 2 21:44:29 2006. Yuck!!! |
|
|
| (102914) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Thu Mar 2 22:39:30 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Peter Rosa on Thu Mar 2 21:44:29 2006. And you would know this how...? |
|
|
| (102916) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Thu Mar 2 22:53:47 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Thu Mar 2 22:39:30 2006. Packed like a bearing. |
|
|
| (102918) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 23:03:44 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Thu Mar 2 18:32:20 2006. Change that last letter to B or it's B7 for ye . . .Did you look up Bartholin's glands yet? |
|
|
| (102919) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Thu Mar 2 23:12:35 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 23:03:44 2006. I don't even wanna know what the hell that is. |
|
|
| (102920) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 23:34:24 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Thu Mar 2 23:12:35 2006. Why not? It has to do with women. |
|
|
| (102922) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by New Brunswick Station on Fri Mar 3 00:16:43 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 2 23:34:24 2006. It's the trickly part of a cunt. |
|
|
| (102924) | |
Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail) |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Mar 3 00:34:23 2006, in response to Re: Subchat politics: at a glance (in more detail), posted by New Brunswick Station on Fri Mar 3 00:16:43 2006. No, that's the urethra. |
|
|
| (102927) | |
Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance |
|
|
Posted by New Brunswick Station on Fri Mar 3 03:04:13 2006, in response to Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance, posted by xtimx on Thu Mar 2 19:31:17 2006. Stem cell - Good, will make nice tree cellsGun control - didn't they already fire David Gunn? Abortion choice - Nah, I don't want to abort choice. I wanna keep the choice. Federal healthcare - Yeah, the federal government is sick and needs some hospital care Port sale - why sell port and not beer or champagne? Social Security reform - Hmm. They're not always shomer shabbos and they daven at irregular times of the day, so I'll support reform. Morning after - After what, a nucular war? Gay marriage - Support. Gay marriage is better than sad marriage. Public smoking ban - Of course; otherwise the public would catch fire. Pat riot Act - Dang. I hate it when Patricia riots. Tell her to cut it out. Creation in schools - If you create in schools, be careful. The teachers may get pissed off at you. Motorcycle helmets - Yes, motorcycles should wear helmets; after all, they carry gun-like objects near their hind wheels and therefore can be shot at. |
|
|
| (102928) | |
Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Mar 3 03:43:48 2006, in response to Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance, posted by New Brunswick Station on Fri Mar 3 03:04:13 2006. You're getting better. Work at it a little more, and you may be ready to be an opener at the comedy clubs . . . and oh yeah—be consistent. |
|
|
| (839743) | |
Re: Social Security Reform (Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance) |
|
|
Posted by dand124 on Sat Sep 10 15:03:59 2011, in response to Re: Social Security Reform (Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance), posted by Charles G on Tue Feb 28 15:08:16 2006. you made the mistake of trying to reason with Olog. |
|
|
| (839747) | |
Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Sep 10 15:20:21 2011, in response to Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance, posted by Train Dude on Mon Feb 27 21:34:12 2006. Interesting! I can honestly say that I've reversed my position in just 2 areas:Gay Marriage - I am not against it at this time. None of my business. Motorcycle Helmet Laws - I am against them. I will continue to wear mine as a matter of FREE CHOICE. |
|
|
| (839748) | |
Re: Social Security Reform (Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance) |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 10 15:22:04 2011, in response to Re: Social Security Reform (Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance), posted by dand124 on Sat Sep 10 15:03:59 2011. The fellow you're necroreplying to is rethinking his position on outsourcing.As for reasoning, that's something that you never do, so how would you know what it was when you came across it? |
|
|
| (839756) | |
Re: Social Security Reform (Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance) |
|
|
Posted by Charles G on Sat Sep 10 15:36:24 2011, in response to Re: Social Security Reform (Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance), posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 10 15:22:04 2011. Not rethinking, recalculating. I've always thought it would even out -- just not as fast as one article might suggest. |
|
|
| (839757) | |
Re: Social Security Reform (Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance) |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 10 15:43:34 2011, in response to Re: Social Security Reform (Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance), posted by Charles G on Sat Sep 10 15:36:24 2011. Your trust in the media to deliver timely reporting is remarkable. |
|
|
| (839759) | |
Re: Social Security Reform (Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance) |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Sep 10 15:45:28 2011, in response to Social Security Reform (Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance), posted by Andrew Kirschner on Mon Feb 27 12:50:14 2006. who do you want to Raise retirement age to 70? |
|
|
| (839761) | |
Olog is a communist Re: Social Security Reform (Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance) |
|
|
Posted by dand124 on Sat Sep 10 15:50:41 2011, in response to Re: Social Security Reform (Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance), posted by Olog-hai on Mon Feb 27 13:08:12 2006. Cap corporate profits at 50 percent. Profits in the thousand-percent margin (which have been going on since the "outsourcing" started decades ago) are beyond the pale.you sound very communist here |
|
|
| (839764) | |
Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 10 15:55:08 2011, in response to Olog is a communist Re: Social Security Reform (Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance), posted by dand124 on Sat Sep 10 15:50:41 2011. Nothing wrong with railing against dishonest profit; that's not communistic. What about your own communistic tendencies? |
|
|
| (839766) | |
Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance |
|
|
Posted by dand124 on Sat Sep 10 15:58:09 2011, in response to Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 10 15:55:08 2011. What about your own communistic tendencies?i don't have any. |
|
|
| (839768) | |
Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 10 16:00:20 2011, in response to Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance, posted by dand124 on Sat Sep 10 15:58:09 2011. LOL, now don't mask them so shallowly. Your views on welfare gave you away on that score. |
|
|
| (839770) | |
Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance |
|
|
Posted by dand124 on Sat Sep 10 16:02:22 2011, in response to Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 10 16:00:20 2011. communists opposes welfare they believe "if you don't work you don't eat". |
|
|
| (839773) | |
Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 10 16:16:35 2011, in response to Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance, posted by dand124 on Sat Sep 10 16:02:22 2011. communists opposes welfareDo they? Why do they support the socialist state then, and believe it to be a step towards communism? they believe "if you don't work you don't eat" That's from the USSR's constitution, not the Manifesto. And it's a corruption of 2 Thessalonians 3:10. |
|
|
| (839774) | |
Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance |
|
|
Posted by dand124 on Sat Sep 10 16:20:41 2011, in response to Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 10 16:16:35 2011. Do they?yes Why do they support the socialist state then, and believe it to be a step towards communism? what does socialism have to do with welfare? That's from the USSR's constitution, not the Manifesto. are you claiming the USSR wasn't communist? And it's a corruption of 2 Thessalonians 3:10. who cares? |
|
|
| (839776) | |
Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 10 16:39:04 2011, in response to Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance, posted by dand124 on Sat Sep 10 16:20:41 2011. what does socialism have to do with welfare?The welfare state was originally called the "Social state", and that's socialism. I see your knowledge of the world around you is sadly limited, especially when it comes to the existence of the USSR's very pervasive welfare system (universal healthcare, universal state education, a common income level, collectivization of everything, ad nauseam). Just to reiterate, here are the "ten planks" from the Communist Manifesto.
are you claiming the USSR wasn't communist? Are you claiming that they lived up to absolutely everything they put in writing? On top of that, are you claiming that they had a state religion?? |
|
|
| (839779) | |
Re: dand124 is diging up 5 year old subthreads |
|
|
Posted by The Silence on Sat Sep 10 16:56:27 2011, in response to Olog is a communist Re: Social Security Reform (Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance), posted by dand124 on Sat Sep 10 15:50:41 2011. Communist would want to get rid of profits all togther, he was just talking about a specific kind of profit. |
|
|
| (839783) | |
Re: dand124 is diging up 5 year old subthreads |
|
|
Posted by RockParkMan on Sat Sep 10 17:31:15 2011, in response to Re: dand124 is diging up 5 year old subthreads, posted by The Silence on Sat Sep 10 16:56:27 2011. There are no more communists. The Chinese got our jobs with socialism (not communism) and the stupid Russians are still playing strategy games and stealing what they can to fatten themselves. Since communism failed in the the early 90s, even the Russians aren't stupid enough to go back to it. |
|
|
| (839787) | |
Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sat Sep 10 17:55:40 2011, in response to Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance, posted by Train Dude on Sat Sep 10 15:20:21 2011. I guess that I didn't have an opinion back then. Now I am against everything except stem cell, gun control, and motorcycle helmets. |
|
|
| (839828) | |
Re: Subtalk politics: at a glance |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Sep 10 20:26:32 2011, in response to Subtalk politics: at a glance, posted by aem7ac on Mon Feb 27 09:45:15 2006. 1st post dated [ Mon Feb 27 09:45:15 2006 ] kinda old eh ? |
|
|
| (839868) | |
Re: dand124 is diging up 5 year old subthreads |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sat Sep 10 22:17:03 2011, in response to Re: dand124 is diging up 5 year old subthreads, posted by RockParkMan on Sat Sep 10 17:31:15 2011. What about Cuba? Aren't they communists? |
|
|
| (839883) | |
Re: dand124 is diging up 5 year old subthreads |
|
|
Posted by RockParkMan on Sun Sep 11 00:05:42 2011, in response to Re: dand124 is diging up 5 year old subthreads, posted by Dave on Sat Sep 10 22:17:03 2011. Cuba is for rent to any player who wants to fuck with the US. If we blew it up, no one would give a fuck. |
|
|
|
Page 8 of 9 |
||