|
|
| Re: US appeals court upholds new Texas abortion rules (1170433) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: US appeals court upholds new Texas abortion rules |
|
|
Posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Sun Apr 6 00:08:14 2014, in response to Re: US appeals court upholds new Texas abortion rules, posted by Nilet on Sat Apr 5 18:54:25 2014. This is what I find rather interesting with you given your liberal viewpoints. You have no problems with women having the emergency option to abort when they have no interest in becoming a mother, but you won't permit men to have a similar option with legal abdication? Why do you permit women an escape clause from the consequences of sex, yet not support something similar for men?No one has the "right" to become a parent without taking responsibility for their child. I do not seek to become a parent. I seek the right to disentangle myself from the rights of a parent. In exchange, I seek to be exempted from supporting something I did not want similar to how a woman does so via abortion. Child support is no more punitive than taxation. Child support for unmarried (and some married) men is taxation without the right to vote for citizens. |
|
|
|