|
|
| Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend? (923785) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||
|
| (924868) | |
Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend? |
|
|
Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Fri Apr 16 22:45:58 2010, in response to Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend?, posted by Kriston Lewis on Fri Apr 16 20:45:51 2010. I don't think you can hotlink images from Google Groups. |
|
|
| (924869) | |
Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR |
|
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Fri Apr 16 22:50:02 2010, in response to Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR, posted by R32_3671 on Fri Apr 16 22:19:26 2010. What's with all the bald guys in the third pic? Skinheads? |
|
|
| (924870) | |
Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR |
|
|
Posted by 9 local on Fri Apr 16 22:53:59 2010, in response to Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR, posted by R32_3671 on Fri Apr 16 22:19:26 2010. 1) Blurry2) Blurry 3) Blurry 4) Blurry Why bother? |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (924871) | |
Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Fri Apr 16 23:00:16 2010, in response to Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR, posted by Kriston Lewis on Fri Apr 16 22:50:02 2010. There are some skinheads in Greenpoint that ride the (G) at times, however they always look very nervous and don't really bother anyone besides their offensive tattoos and shirts. |
|
|
| (924879) | |
Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend? |
|
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Fri Apr 16 23:19:28 2010, in response to Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend?, posted by Kriston Lewis on Fri Apr 16 20:45:51 2010.   |
|
|
| (924880) | |
Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR |
|
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Fri Apr 16 23:21:14 2010, in response to Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR, posted by Osmosis Jones on Fri Apr 16 23:00:16 2010. Dunno what they're nervous about. I always thought of them as being a tough bunch. |
|
|
| (924883) | |
Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Fri Apr 16 23:25:28 2010, in response to Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR, posted by 9 local on Fri Apr 16 22:53:59 2010. It does prove that it happenned. There is a value to having a couple such shots. |
|
|
| (924884) | |
Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by MattW@15st_prospect_park on Fri Apr 16 23:25:45 2010, in response to Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!!, posted by R32_3671 on Fri Apr 16 09:29:32 2010. "I Know to this day that the Foamers are still hating the fact that I was the ONLY Railbuff to even step foot on an R160 (G) in passenger service"You sound like another foamer who was the last one out of South Ferry and off the last R40. News flash, no one cares. |
|
|
| (924886) | |
Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Fri Apr 16 23:27:34 2010, in response to Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!!, posted by MattW@15st_prospect_park on Fri Apr 16 23:25:45 2010. Agreed. |
|
|
| (924887) | |
Re: Definition of ''Foamer'' |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Fri Apr 16 23:28:16 2010, in response to Definition of "Foamer", posted by R30A on Fri Apr 16 22:42:24 2010. I thought it was to describe: 'those who overly obsessed about stuff to the point they 'soil' themselves'. |
|
|
| (924888) | |
Re: Definition of ''Foamer'' |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Fri Apr 16 23:30:30 2010, in response to Re: Definition of ''Foamer'', posted by Grand Concourse on Fri Apr 16 23:28:16 2010. Such are generally the same as those referred to in my post. |
|
|
| (924897) | |
Re: Definition of ''Foamer'' |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Fri Apr 16 23:59:41 2010, in response to Re: Definition of ''Foamer'', posted by R30A on Fri Apr 16 23:30:30 2010. Oh ok. Just checking. |
|
|
| (924899) | |
Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by R32_3671 on Sat Apr 17 00:05:26 2010, in response to Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!!, posted by MattW@15st_prospect_park on Fri Apr 16 23:25:45 2010. Im not a Foamer Asshole, I really don't care about that, I just said that to get the R160 Foamers, You No Life Ass Smelling No-Pussy getting Motherfuckers are going to keep on fucking with me and I am going to flip the fuck out. |
|
|
| (924901) | |
Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by MattW@15st_prospect_park on Sat Apr 17 00:09:44 2010, in response to Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!!, posted by R32_3671 on Sat Apr 17 00:05:26 2010. Geez dude it's just the internet, it's not a big deal. Also, what do I care if you flip out, I think it would be kinda funny seeing as how cursing alot really gets your point across and people on your side. |
|
|
| (924903) | |
Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by R32_3671 on Sat Apr 17 00:12:51 2010, in response to Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!!, posted by MattW@15st_prospect_park on Sat Apr 17 00:09:44 2010. I know its not but some people just get on your last nerves, Especialy stupid railfans that can't understand real life, Then they talk shit, When you see them in person, They are Fucking Quiet like pussies. |
|
|
| (924904) | |
Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR |
|
|
Posted by MattW@15st_prospect_park on Sat Apr 17 00:14:18 2010, in response to Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR, posted by Kriston Lewis on Fri Apr 16 23:21:14 2010. Depends on the kind of skinhead they are. There are the skinheads of the punk verity and then there are the neo Nazi skinheads. |
|
|
| (924906) | |
Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by MattW@15st_prospect_park on Sat Apr 17 00:16:01 2010, in response to Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!!, posted by R32_3671 on Sat Apr 17 00:12:51 2010. Must suck for those who don't understand life... |
|
|
| (924909) | |
Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR |
|
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Sat Apr 17 00:26:30 2010, in response to Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR, posted by MattW@15st_prospect_park on Sat Apr 17 00:14:18 2010. neo Nazi skinheadsThose are the ones I was thinking of! |
|
|
| (924910) | |
Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Sat Apr 17 00:27:50 2010, in response to Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR, posted by Kriston Lewis on Fri Apr 16 23:21:14 2010. This is New York, not Nebraska. |
|
|
| (924926) | |
Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend? |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sat Apr 17 01:53:39 2010, in response to Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend?, posted by R32_3671 on Fri Apr 16 22:10:26 2010. So..why are you making such a big deal about where this particular train will run?The way You put it..as if You were the "GO TO PERSON FOR THIS"...Calling folks "foamers"..get a damn grip.You don't "know" jack..you are just as much a FOAMER as the O.P.. since you can't seem to get over catching that 160 G train out of where ever you caught it.. Son, I ride the G line..don't much care for the new cars since the Broadway EL is not too far away from me..and I ride that too.. Common sense..if the line gets them or not..WE couldn't care less..we ride to get to where we need to go..period.If we happen to get on a "newer train",then so be it..no big deal. also..I see plenty of folks on that train..so how were YOU the "only one to catch it"? |
|
|
| (924927) | |
Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sat Apr 17 01:55:46 2010, in response to Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR, posted by R30A on Fri Apr 16 23:25:28 2010. Not so much..if all you can do is call others "foamerS" that didn't Catch it LATE AT NIGHT.... |
|
|
| (924928) | |
Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sat Apr 17 01:58:30 2010, in response to Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!!, posted by R32_3671 on Sat Apr 17 00:05:26 2010. LOL!What is that suppose to mean? FLIP OUT? GET IT STARTED,SON! |
|
|
| (924929) | |
Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend? |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sat Apr 17 02:01:16 2010, in response to Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend?, posted by Kriston Lewis on Fri Apr 16 10:27:19 2010. I would do it again ....just to piss him off. |
|
|
| (924935) | |
Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend? |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Sat Apr 17 02:43:53 2010, in response to Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend?, posted by Kriston Lewis on Fri Apr 16 23:19:28 2010. The Q3 to JFK Airport does not serve Kew Gardens - Union Turnpike. |
|
|
| (924951) | |
Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend? |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Sat Apr 17 08:11:10 2010, in response to Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend?, posted by G1Ravage on Sat Apr 17 02:43:53 2010. I think Kriston meant the Q10 which does go to JFK from Kew Gardens-Union Turnpike |
|
|
| (924953) | |
Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR |
|
|
Posted by R32_3672 on Sat Apr 17 08:17:02 2010, in response to Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR, posted by Edwards! on Sat Apr 17 01:55:46 2010. obviously you missed the part of "Railfans" not the genral public.and i wouldn't piss him off if i was you because you might not like what will happen to you if he see's you. |
|
|
| (924960) | |
Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend? |
|
|
Posted by insidetransitcom on Sat Apr 17 08:51:13 2010, in response to Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend?, posted by Kriston Lewis on Fri Apr 16 23:19:28 2010. do normal people know what overnight hawk means? heck, i have no idea what hawk means :) |
|
|
| (924978) | |
Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by R32_3671 on Sat Apr 17 10:47:57 2010, in response to Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!!, posted by Edwards! on Sat Apr 17 01:58:30 2010. Let Me tell you something MotherFucker, I don't know you and you don't Know Me, Stay in your Fucking Place and keep your Mouth shut.Im am going to be the right Person and just stay away from this bullshit, But don't direspect me if I didn't disrespect you. |
|
|
| (924984) | |
Re: Definition of ''Foamer'' |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Sat Apr 17 11:16:38 2010, in response to Definition of "Foamer", posted by R30A on Fri Apr 16 22:42:24 2010. A "Foamer" is a steam locomotive with a digestive problem in the boiler. It is making foam, and not enough steam. It was a very difficult locomotive to operate. Crews would curse it. Call it a "Foamer". It would be reported to maintenance as such at the end of the run, and they would (if the crew was lucky and the beast not needed on the road right away) be cleaned out. Sometimes it was the cleaning that caused the foaming and it would just have to be run out of the system.It takes no leap of the imagination to see why crews would call a troublesome railfan a "foamer". NOW ewe knoe the rest of the story. ROAR |
|
|
| (925004) | |
Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend? |
|
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Sat Apr 17 12:19:51 2010, in response to Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend?, posted by G1Ravage on Sat Apr 17 02:43:53 2010. That was an oversight. |
|
|
| (925005) | |
Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend? |
|
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Sat Apr 17 12:22:55 2010, in response to Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend?, posted by insidetransitcom on Sat Apr 17 08:51:13 2010. I seriously doubt anyone in the public would see this anyway. Still, NYCT frequently use internal terms on their Twitter, it might have come up somewhere. |
|
|
| (925015) | |
Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sat Apr 17 13:35:08 2010, in response to Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!!, posted by R32_3671 on Sat Apr 17 10:47:57 2010. LOL...!Do you talk to your mother with that mouth ,young man? Shame on you for showing us how vulgar you truly are... so disrespectful..tch..tch tcks... So..are you man enough to put me in my place? Lets see you do that..without being nasty..if you can,sonny jim. Bet you can't.... |
|
|
| (925016) | |
Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sat Apr 17 13:43:32 2010, in response to Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR, posted by R32_3672 on Sat Apr 17 08:17:02 2010. LOL....!Now THATS FUNNY! Who the hell do you think you are? You think your tough talk gonna scare somebody? WAKE UP,DUDE! You don't know WHO you are dealing with...so relax. |
|
|
| (925018) | |
Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sat Apr 17 14:02:28 2010, in response to Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!!, posted by MattW@15st_prospect_park on Sat Apr 17 00:16:01 2010. what really sucks..is folks who confuse the two...who cares if some railfan caught a new train on a line late at night? eventually,they will show up everywhere! |
|
|
| (925033) | |
Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by MattW@15st_prospect_park on Sat Apr 17 17:27:38 2010, in response to Re: TO ALL FOAMERS NO R160 (G)!!!!!!!!!!, posted by Edwards! on Sat Apr 17 14:02:28 2010. "eventually,they will show up everywhere!"Alot of people seem to miss that whole concept. |
|
|
| (925034) | |
Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR |
|
|
Posted by MattW@15st_prospect_park on Sat Apr 17 17:30:10 2010, in response to Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR, posted by Kriston Lewis on Sat Apr 17 00:26:30 2010. I don't think you will find many of that verity around these parts. |
|
|
| (925044) | |
Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Sat Apr 17 18:52:12 2010, in response to Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR, posted by MattW@15st_prospect_park on Sat Apr 17 17:30:10 2010. Yup espeically with emperor Bloomberg's anti-gun stance. They wouldn't be allowed to keep as many guns around. |
|
|
| (925055) | |
Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR |
|
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Sat Apr 17 20:14:54 2010, in response to Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR, posted by MattW@15st_prospect_park on Sat Apr 17 17:30:10 2010. I don't think you will find many of that verity around these parts.Judging by the last time the KKK tried to march here, me thinks they wouldn't last too long. I thought that the majority of them were in the neo Nazi category. Glad to be wrong, even if it's only in this region. |
|
|
| (925331) | |
Re: No R160's 100% R46's on the (G) |
|
|
Posted by R32_3671 on Sun Apr 18 23:54:37 2010, in response to Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR, posted by Kriston Lewis on Sat Apr 17 20:14:54 2010. The (G) was ALL R46's for the ones who said r160's were going to be on the (G). So for the ones that disagreed to me about the R160's going to be on the (G) for this GO, you Must feel very Stupid. |
|
|
| (925335) | |
Re: No R160's 100% R46's on the (G) |
|
|
Posted by Bjc3914 on Mon Apr 19 00:06:06 2010, in response to Re: No R160's 100% R46's on the (G), posted by R32_3671 on Sun Apr 18 23:54:37 2010. Kriston talking about skin heads and you still talking about R-160 G train...lol |
|
|
| (925338) | |
Re: No R160's 100% R46's on the (G) |
|
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Mon Apr 19 00:32:00 2010, in response to Re: No R160's 100% R46's on the (G), posted by R32_3671 on Sun Apr 18 23:54:37 2010. OH WHO THE FUCK CARESTHEY'RE JUST FUCKING SUBWAY CARS GO OUTSIDE DAMMIT |
|
|
| (925341) | |
Re: No R160's 100% R46's on the (G) |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Apr 19 00:50:25 2010, in response to Re: No R160's 100% R46's on the (G), posted by R32_3671 on Sun Apr 18 23:54:37 2010. ...go to the park..play..get a girlfriend or something..the 160's will be here after you are dead...why care about where they will run? gezz.. |
|
|
| (925370) | |
Re: No R160's 100% R46's on the (G) |
|
|
Posted by r33/r36 mainline on Mon Apr 19 07:07:10 2010, in response to Re: No R160's 100% R46's on the (G), posted by Kriston Lewis on Mon Apr 19 00:32:00 2010. Appluse |
|
|
| (925371) | |
Re: Could the G train be running R160 this weekend? |
|
|
Posted by transitbuff on Mon Apr 19 07:19:46 2010, in response to Could the G train be running R160 this weekend?, posted by Chipper10 on Tue Apr 13 21:25:12 2010. Then they must have sent at least 5 consists lite from Jam. Yd to C.I., for the start of "G" service early Sat. |
|
|
| (925374) | |
Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Mon Apr 19 07:42:39 2010, in response to Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR, posted by Kriston Lewis on Sat Apr 17 20:14:54 2010. I think that the ones on the (G) train, or at least most of them converted in prison and didn't really want to join initially. |
|
|
| (925380) | |
Re: No R160's 100% R46's on the (G) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Apr 19 08:12:17 2010, in response to Re: No R160's 100% R46's on the (G), posted by Edwards! on Mon Apr 19 00:50:25 2010. ...go to the park..play..get a girlfriend or something..with a BIG BREAST...the 160's will be here after you are DEAD...why care about where they will RUN?gezz.. fixt. Now what have you done with Edwards! your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (925381) | |
Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Apr 19 08:15:13 2010, in response to Re: Photo R160 (G) LAST YEAR, posted by Kriston Lewis on Fri Apr 16 22:50:02 2010. Take the skinheads bowling!your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (925390) | |
Re: No R160's 100% R46's on the (G) |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Mon Apr 19 08:38:03 2010, in response to Re: No R160's 100% R46's on the (G), posted by Fred G on Mon Apr 19 08:12:17 2010. "...go to the park..play..get a girlfriend or something..with a BIGgezz.. fixt. Now what have you done with Edwards! your pal, Fred" I ficksed yur ficksed post. |
|
|
| (925391) | |
Re: No R160's 100% R46's on the (G) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Apr 19 08:45:11 2010, in response to Re: No R160's 100% R46's on the (G), posted by Osmosis Jones on Mon Apr 19 08:38:03 2010. Maybe so, but you killed the inside joke :Pyour pal, Fred |
|
|
| (925392) | |
Re: No R160's 100% R46's on the (G) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Apr 19 08:45:11 2010, in response to Re: No R160's 100% R46's on the (G), posted by Osmosis Jones on Mon Apr 19 08:38:03 2010. Maybe so, but you killed the inside joke :Pyour pal, Fred |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||
