|
|
| Re: All This Bullshit (906013) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 6 of 6 |
||
|
| (908606) | |
Re: All This Bullshit |
|
|
Posted by R42 4820 on Sat Mar 6 08:21:28 2010, in response to Re: All This Bullshit, posted by R32_3671 on Sat Mar 6 00:05:42 2010. Agreed. |
|
|
| (908607) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Vacuum Tube on Sat Mar 6 08:22:11 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Broadway Lion on Sat Mar 6 08:07:52 2010. First, he never said more reliable.Therefore what he heard in Dec was a rumor not info. You should check the threads because he did open his trap. He is just playing games telling everyone he knows everything but tells you nothing using his boss as an excuse. If he can't give you any insight he should stay away from the thread and stopping asking for proof. He doesn't tell anyone anything till after it happens. |
|
|
| (908611) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by R42 4820 on Sat Mar 6 08:25:16 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Vacuum Tube on Sat Mar 6 08:22:11 2010. Oh...my...GOD.WHO ARE YOU?????? |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (908624) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Sat Mar 6 08:53:18 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by R42 4820 on Sat Mar 6 08:25:16 2010. Well, TBH I thought he was an incarnation of another poster but since it is still between sundown friday & sundown saturday it can't be him |
|
|
| (908628) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Sat Mar 6 10:06:56 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Vacuum Tube on Sat Mar 6 08:22:11 2010. "He doesn't tell anyone anything till after it happens."This is good. It means that he is keeping his employer's business to himself, as it should be. Last December I heard a rumor that President Obama is BLACK. Last Friday I saw a picture of him, and he sure looked black to me. So what *is* your point? ROAR |
|
|
| (908645) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by R42 4820 on Sat Mar 6 10:53:33 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by arnine on Sat Mar 6 08:53:18 2010. Oh, ok. |
|
|
| (908652) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Vacuum Tube on Sat Mar 6 11:02:03 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Broadway Lion on Sat Mar 6 10:06:56 2010. If he can't give you any insight he should stay away from the thread and stopping asking for proof. He doesn't tell anyone anything till after it happens. |
|
|
| (908654) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Vacuum Tube on Sat Mar 6 11:05:23 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by arnine on Sat Mar 6 08:53:18 2010. Guess Again |
|
|
| (908655) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by R42 4820 on Sat Mar 6 11:06:44 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Vacuum Tube on Sat Mar 6 11:05:23 2010. Monorail??? |
|
|
| (908663) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Sat Mar 6 11:17:50 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by R42 4820 on Sat Mar 6 11:06:44 2010. Nah not witty enough... |
|
|
| (908664) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by R42 4820 on Sat Mar 6 11:19:50 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Railman718 on Sat Mar 6 11:17:50 2010. Ken S.? |
|
|
| (908666) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Sat Mar 6 11:23:13 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by R42 4820 on Sat Mar 6 11:19:50 2010. Nope Ken never used foul language from what i have seen.. |
|
|
| (908670) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sat Mar 6 11:26:02 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Vacuum Tube on Sat Mar 6 11:05:23 2010. Terrapin Station, because his "best pal" works with the TA 'big wigs'. |
|
|
| (908673) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Sat Mar 6 11:29:39 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sat Mar 6 11:26:02 2010. Actually no.... |
|
|
| (908679) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sat Mar 6 11:44:17 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Railman718 on Sat Mar 6 11:29:39 2010. It's just that 'odd' feeling... |
|
|
| (908708) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Sat Mar 6 13:04:25 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sat Mar 6 11:26:02 2010. Sorry it is during that time of the week where he can't post due to religious customs. Yet he is posting. |
|
|
| (908722) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 6 13:53:51 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Vacuum Tube on Sat Mar 6 11:02:03 2010. If he can't give us any "insight", then there's none to give. He's credible; you certainly ain't.So again, WWYBYWB? |
|
|
| (908724) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 6 13:55:22 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Vacuum Tube on Fri Mar 5 02:23:30 2010. IOW, hot air. |
|
|
| (908727) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sat Mar 6 13:59:01 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 6 13:53:51 2010. I've only read a few of his posts in this thread, but I'm gonna say MustangFan. |
|
|
| (908729) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 6 14:00:01 2010, in response to Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Thu Mar 4 23:45:15 2010. The more he fights about the matter, the more incorrect he gets. It's the nature of the WWW. |
|
|
| (908730) | |
Re:WWYBYWB |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sat Mar 6 14:00:01 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 6 13:53:51 2010. MustangFan and I forgot his other handles. |
|
|
| (908731) | |
Re:WWYBYWB |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 6 14:00:51 2010, in response to Re:WWYBYWB, posted by Easy on Sat Mar 6 14:00:01 2010. Probably right. Let's see if a confession is forthcoming . . . |
|
|
| (908732) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 6 14:01:40 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by Newkirk Images on Fri Mar 5 19:55:59 2010. Hey, ho, let's GOH, hey, ho, let's GOH . . . |
|
|
| (908779) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube, that is great news, scrapping the R44 SIRTOA cars. |
|
|
Posted by MainR3664 on Sat Mar 6 17:14:48 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube, that is great news, scrapping the R44 SIRTOA cars., posted by Hank Eisenstein on Tue Mar 2 09:43:36 2010. I remember that!! |
|
|
| (908854) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 6 20:46:17 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Vacuum Tube on Fri Mar 5 22:39:00 2010. Okay, and while i'm considering a change in my Subchat handle, let us clarify how you got your very appropriate Subchat name. It seems that you chose a very appropriate subchat handle for yourself. |
|
|
| (908856) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sat Mar 6 21:12:06 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 6 20:46:17 2010. Are you trying to get B7'd!? But that was funny. |
|
|
| (908887) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Vacuum Tube on Sun Mar 7 00:16:34 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may be totally incorrect..., posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 6 14:01:40 2010. Did you take off your horny scales yet? |
|
|
| (908900) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Mar 7 01:31:48 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may be totally incorrect..., posted by Vacuum Tube on Sun Mar 7 00:16:34 2010. I'm not the testudine here. Is this a confession? |
|
|
| (908919) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Sun Mar 7 03:13:53 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by R42 4820 on Sat Mar 6 11:19:50 2010. Not nearly unstable enough. |
|
|
| (908931) | |
Re: Vacuum Tube may be totally incorrect... |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Mar 7 04:04:48 2010, in response to Re: Vacuum Tube may not be totally incorrect..., posted by R42 4820 on Sat Mar 6 11:19:50 2010. Nah. |
|
|
| (908966) | |
Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED |
|
|
Posted by R42 4820 on Sun Mar 7 10:16:30 2010, in response to Re: R44 SIRTOA CARS TO BE SCRAPPED, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 6 20:46:17 2010. LMAO! |
|
|
|
Page 6 of 6 |
||
