***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** (1149168) | |
Home > SubChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 1 of 2 |
(1149168) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posted by Concourse Express on Fri Apr 6 17:30:08 2012 IT'S THAT TIME AGAIN! ;)I recently received the 2011 Annual Subway ridership data and, as I've done in years past, I will post them by trunk with percent changes from last year. Enjoy!
*Station still closed due to WTC reconstruction **Station closed during part of 2011 for rehab; ridership at nearby stations may be disproportionately affected by such ***Downtown platform re-opened on 09.06.11 ****23/Ely (E)(M), Court Sq (G), and 45 Rd - Court House Square (7) merged into one complex (Court Sq E/G/M/7) Discuss. my blog |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1149183) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by chud1 on Fri Apr 6 17:47:33 2012, in response to ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Concourse Express on Fri Apr 6 17:30:08 2012. wheres 161st yankee stadium for da #4 and B and D Train?chud1 |
|
(1149184) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by J trainloco on Fri Apr 6 17:48:25 2012, in response to ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Concourse Express on Fri Apr 6 17:30:08 2012. My immediate reaction is about the Culver line: for all the griping about how the Park Slope local stations need to have service, their ridership numbers aren't all that high, and they're lower than the express stations, with the exception of Carroll. |
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It
|
(1149189) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Concourse Express on Fri Apr 6 18:07:25 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by chud1 on Fri Apr 6 17:47:33 2012. It's there. Look where it says "Upper Manhattan/Bronx Transfer."my blog |
|
(1149203) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Jackson Park B Train on Fri Apr 6 19:11:45 2012, in response to ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Concourse Express on Fri Apr 6 17:30:08 2012. Thanks for the ##. Interesting to see where people do/don't go. |
|
(1149209) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Fri Apr 6 19:42:57 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by J trainloco on Fri Apr 6 17:48:25 2012. The numbers are off due to the Culver Rehab project. |
|
(1149210) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by italianstallion on Fri Apr 6 19:53:37 2012, in response to ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Concourse Express on Fri Apr 6 17:30:08 2012. Huge increases on the G, J and M. Central Brooklyn keeps growing. |
|
(1149248) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Concourse Express on Fri Apr 6 23:43:42 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by italianstallion on Fri Apr 6 19:53:37 2012. Indeed it is. Also, the new (M) route is clearly a smash-hit.my blog |
|
(1149249) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Concourse Express on Fri Apr 6 23:47:39 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Jackson Park B Train on Fri Apr 6 19:11:45 2012. You're very welcome!my blog |
|
(1149254) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by grand concourse on Sat Apr 7 00:12:30 2012, in response to ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Concourse Express on Fri Apr 6 17:30:08 2012. Thanks for posting the list! |
|
(1149265) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Concourse Express on Sat Apr 7 01:00:11 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by grand concourse on Sat Apr 7 00:12:30 2012. No prob GC!my blog |
|
(1149270) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by chud1 on Sat Apr 7 03:47:10 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Concourse Express on Fri Apr 6 18:07:25 2012. ok found it. but its still a bronx station.chud1 |
|
(1149287) | |
The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 06:59:34 2012, in response to ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Concourse Express on Fri Apr 6 17:30:08 2012. As I suspected, the M line to Midtown has been an overwhelming success, the 2011 stats the first full year of stats for the new service. The M line, among the top increases in the system.Of the M only stations in Bushwick and Ridgewood, the upswing has been amazing. Does anyone still have any doubt that the M line people wanted Midtown, and that this has been an outstanding success? Metropolitan Ave - 8.5% Fresh Pond Road - Up 11.26% Forest Ave - Up 12.19% Seneca Ave - Up 13.2% Knickerbocker Ave - Up 12.82% Central Ave - Up 17.03% Myrtle-Bway - Up 5.82% Myrtle-Wyckoff, shared with the L, unchanged (although I would bet to guess transfers are down, but there's no statistics available on that). |
|
(1149288) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 07:02:20 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Concourse Express on Sat Apr 7 01:00:11 2012. Yes, THANK you! |
|
(1149289) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 07:04:25 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by italianstallion on Fri Apr 6 19:53:37 2012. While Central Brooklyn is growing, the increases on the M are mainly due to the new Midtown M, which has been an overwhelming success. 2011 is the first full year of stats. The Ridgewood stations (which was always stable, like Forest, Seneca, Fresh Pond) also saw the same huge increases along the M. |
|
(1149290) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 07:05:33 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by J trainloco on Fri Apr 6 17:48:25 2012. The numbers there are skewed because of the Culver Viaduct closures/rehab. |
|
(1149291) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 07:06:33 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by chud1 on Sat Apr 7 03:47:10 2012. It's easy to make it searchable by copying the whole table, and pasting it into an excel document. You can then sort by station, etc. |
|
(1149293) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Lou From Middletown NY on Sat Apr 7 07:21:03 2012, in response to ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Concourse Express on Fri Apr 6 17:30:08 2012. Look at the Aqueduct stations - you think something might have opened up there or something....now imagine if they put REAL gambling in there.... |
|
(1149297) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 07:29:03 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Lou From Middletown NY on Sat Apr 7 07:21:03 2012. Very odd, didn't the casino only open up in December? That can't possibly be all from December could it? Perhaps also construction workers, employees, etc that began long before opening day also had an affect. Next year will be the real numbers. |
|
(1149321) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Lou From Middletown NY on Sat Apr 7 09:41:08 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 07:29:03 2012. I forgot that...... |
|
(1149325) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by N6 Limited on Sat Apr 7 09:58:23 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 07:04:25 2012. We've been telling the MTA to merge the V and M train for years ;) |
|
(1149326) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by N6 Limited on Sat Apr 7 10:00:04 2012, in response to The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 06:59:34 2012. J riders probably want midtown as well |
|
(1149328) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sat Apr 7 10:02:13 2012, in response to The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 06:59:34 2012. Midnight Moe has a nice ring to it.:)Of course, once on the I love Lucy line, Moe becomes McGillicuddy, Lucy's maiden name. |
|
(1149334) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by N6 Limited on Sat Apr 7 10:26:31 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by chud1 on Sat Apr 7 03:47:10 2012. Hence "Upper Manhattan/Bronx Transfer" |
|
(1149337) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by chud1 on Sat Apr 7 10:39:53 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 07:06:33 2012. ok will do.chud1 |
|
(1149347) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Lou From Middletown NY on Sat Apr 7 11:18:15 2012, in response to The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 06:59:34 2012. And all of the J stations east of Myrtle have nice healthy gains too - suddenly midtown is an easy across the platform transfer for them. |
|
(1149400) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Wado MP73 on Sat Apr 7 15:14:13 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 07:29:03 2012. They partially opened in late October. The 1,350 job positions alone would have likely generated more than 50,000 entries in two months. Add to that the customers who should far outnumber the employees. I'm not surprised.We might expect a 4-500% increase next year. |
|
(1149407) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Wado MP73 on Sat Apr 7 15:37:30 2012, in response to The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 06:59:34 2012. OTOH...Broad St (J,Z) -9.95% Fulton St (A,C,J,Z,2,3,4,5) -1.81% Chambers St (J,Z)/Bklyn Bridge-City Hall (4,5,6) -0.95% Canal St (J,N,Q,R,Z,6) -2.69% Bowery (J,Z) -5.05% haha..... Seneca, Knickerbocker and Central going up was expected. They probably used to walk to Myrtle-Wyckoff or Myrtle-Bway before. |
|
(1149436) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Apr 7 17:33:15 2012, in response to Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Wado MP73 on Sat Apr 7 15:37:30 2012. Yes. I used to often walk to wyckoff from the forest ave station area all the time when i lived there.....I used to go to union square to the 28th street broadway station. It was a three seat ride if i took the M too. The new M to 23/6th instead would have been a godsent. |
|
(1149441) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by J trainloco on Sat Apr 7 17:50:07 2012, in response to The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 06:59:34 2012. Does anyone still have any doubt that the M line people wanted Midtown,and that this has been an outstanding success?Midtown is a more popular destination than Lower Manhattan. Any line not going to midtown will become more popular if it is suddenly rerouted to midtown. |
|
(1149467) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 19:43:34 2012, in response to Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by J trainloco on Sat Apr 7 17:50:07 2012. Of course. But before the M/V combo, there were many here against rerouting it because of the people that used to use it going downtown, and it was pointed out that there were many more that wanted Midtown, but they would have none of that. |
|
(1149468) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 19:45:04 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Lou From Middletown NY on Sat Apr 7 09:41:08 2012. But still, the stats are interesting. That's a huge increase. Either it's just from December (and if that is the case, then we are REALLY in for something interesting in next year's stats), or more likely all the activity from workers, construction workers, and so forth while they were building.... |
|
(1149469) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 19:47:05 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Wado MP73 on Sat Apr 7 15:14:13 2012. Next year is going to be huge increases. That said, since it already increased a lot this year because of the workers (while 1350 positions, not all of them come by subway, I am sure some come by car too), but that said, it will still be interesting to compare 2010 to 2012, as that will show the real impact of this....2011 already changed the 2010 stats dramatically. |
|
(1149470) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 19:48:11 2012, in response to Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by N6 Limited on Sat Apr 7 10:00:04 2012. I am sure they want it just as bad as M riders, but "something" has to serve Nassau. What didn't make sense was having two lines on Nassau St. |
|
(1149471) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 19:50:05 2012, in response to Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sat Apr 7 10:02:13 2012. The Poor J is now the outcast. Larry has been booming for years, and now that M moved up, he's booming now too.....leaving the poor J in the dust. |
|
(1149510) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Apr 7 23:42:32 2012, in response to The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 06:59:34 2012. What's curious is . . how did these new riders commute to Midtown before the M change? |
|
(1149512) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sun Apr 8 00:02:05 2012, in response to Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by N6 Limited on Sat Apr 7 10:00:04 2012. Nah, Curly's stuck exclusively in Three Stooges territory.:) |
|
(1149513) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Apr 8 00:04:32 2012, in response to The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 06:59:34 2012. Which only shows to go that had the old KK train run more often and had better equipment, Chrystie wasn't such a bad call after all. |
|
(1149515) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sun Apr 8 00:05:29 2012, in response to Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 19:50:05 2012. Yeah, poor Curly is a victim of soicumstance. |
|
(1149516) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sun Apr 8 00:06:11 2012, in response to Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sat Apr 7 10:02:13 2012. Make that Midtown Moe. That sounds just as good.:) |
|
(1149531) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 8 04:22:09 2012, in response to Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by italianstallion on Sat Apr 7 23:42:32 2012. Walked to the already over crowded L train, bus to Wyckoff for the L train, bus to some other subway station. Moved to the area because of easier transit, and so forth. |
|
(1149532) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 8 04:26:41 2012, in response to Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 8 04:22:09 2012. Actually the fact that fare counts stayed the same while every other station around it went up double digits is very telling. People that used to walk or take the bus to Wyckoff for the L train are now getting on at their local M station instead to take the M train instead of the L. All those people now getting on at their local M station instead of going to Myrtle-Wyckoff for the L train directly, offset the increase of people using the M station at Wyckoff. As I mentioned, I used to live in the Forest Ave are and often walked to Wyckoff Ave to make what would have been a three train commute to a two train commute. |
|
(1149533) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 8 04:31:21 2012, in response to Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Apr 8 00:04:32 2012. Yup. All the speculation about all the M/V combo threads over the years, and even the speculation before the V ever existed about whether the Chrystie connection should be used culminated in these 2011 stats.... |
|
(1149633) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by N6 Limited on Sun Apr 8 16:19:19 2012, in response to Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 19:43:34 2012. Also, there was the argument about 8 car trains on Queens Blvd |
|
(1149666) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sun Apr 8 19:20:05 2012, in response to Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 8 04:31:21 2012. Well, the results speak for themselves. |
|
(1149671) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by numbersix on Sun Apr 8 20:09:28 2012, in response to Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by italianstallion on Sat Apr 7 23:42:32 2012. I used to take the J to Essex for the F. I would guess the number of transfers there has dropped since the M was rerouted to midtown. The L to Union Square or 8th Avenue was also an option. |
|
(1149678) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Elkeeper on Sun Apr 8 21:03:36 2012, in response to Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 8 04:22:09 2012. So, I take it that the "M" is a success? |
|
(1149680) | |
Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Concourse Express on Sun Apr 8 21:07:47 2012, in response to Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 7 19:47:05 2012. Each year seems to tell an interesting story ridership-wise...Looks like the story for 2012 will be Aqueduct (also, we'll see how the Brighton Line fares now that reconstruction is more-or-less finished and (B) express service is back...). I'm sure there are others too... my blog |
|
(1149683) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by Concourse Express on Sun Apr 8 21:10:53 2012, in response to Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Elkeeper on Sun Apr 8 21:03:36 2012. So, I take it that the "M" is a success?It sure is! Even the MTA ran a story on the new (M)'s success. my blog |
|
(1149691) | |
Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 8 21:34:02 2012, in response to Re: The Midtown M Train Re: ***2011 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Concourse Express on Sun Apr 8 21:10:53 2012. Wow, thanks, very interesting!! It's all the speculation many of us came up with in this thread!Subway Ridership at Highest Levels Since 1950! Everyone knows there is no better way to navigate the city than riding the subway. In 2011, subway ridership increased 2.3% from 2010….that's more than 36 million trips! Weekend ridership also continues to swell. In fact, average weekend ridership topped 5.4 million, the highest weekend ridership since 1947. Some other notes based on results through November 2011: The Myrtle Av M line had the strongest growth of any line, likely a continuing effect of the service change that re-routed the M line via 6th Avenue in Manhattan and Queens Blvd. in Queens. We continue to see strong growth in northern Brooklyn on the western portions of the L and J lines running through Williamsburg and Bushwick. The Aqueduct-North Conduit Ave A station (and Aqueduct Racetrack station when open) saw a large ridership increase after the closure of off-track betting in December 2010. Ridership at Aqueduct-North Conduit Av nearly tripled after the opening of the Resorts World Casino at the racetrack on October 28, 2011. |
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |