Home · Maps · About

Home > SubChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: Hunters Point vs LIRR Round 1

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed May 27 07:55:50 2009, in response to Re: Hunters Point vs LIRR Round 1, posted by Broadway Lion on Tue May 26 23:28:18 2009.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
The lady has made simple legal mistakes in many of her decisions already. She thinks that the Supreme Court is supposed to be a bastion of correcting wrongs.

Terrible.

The Place of the Supreme Court is to determine that the laws that were followed were constitutional in the first place. The Supreme Court is to concern itself with the Constitution and its protection, and not for tilting at social windmills.

And she is supposed to be "impartial". It's quite clear she is not, as she even said "a hispanic woman can decide better......" What the hell is that for a judge to say???

And this takes the cake. She believes "policy" is made in the Judicial branch? I guess she forgot about the other two branches:



(There are no responses to this message.)

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]