|
|
| Re: Second Ave Alignment Change (637789) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Second Ave Alignment Change |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Jun 22 01:26:37 2008, in response to Re: Second Ave Alignment Change, posted by Edwards! on Sun Jun 22 01:08:27 2008. Bless ya! Had no idea of what was going on there for reasons you already understand, don't care since the subway doesn't stop ANYWHERE in my 'hood. Heh.But your mentioning that does shed some light (to me at least) as to why 72 is important for three tracks, and maybe it makes a little sense if they DO decide to drop it from the "plan." I see it now being intended more for short turns to do a "meet" off-hours if usage is lower than expected. If that's the case, then it *might* be expendable. Still, having to get a dog out of the way because *I* was messing up the railroad, seems it should be kept in there anyway. I can see it being of TREMENDOUS value when the southern portion ever gets built for a "2nd/6th meet." |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|