|
|
| Re: The (V) Still Looking For Love And Respect (455057) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: The (V) Still Looking For Love And Respect |
|
|
Posted by mambomta on Mon Jul 2 22:13:06 2007, in response to Re: The (V) Still Looking For Love And Respect, posted by PATHman on Mon Jul 2 21:59:34 2007. When did I ask for a less crowded train?Just about every time you complain about the V. You also neglect to note that a less crowded train has lower dwell times, which actually benefits you. The average non-foamer simply wants a train that will take them to their destination as quickly as possible. And in many cases, the local will get them there faster. And don't forget, you cannot have any expresses without locals Have you ever heard the phrase New York Minute? Yes I have. It is a meaningless argument used when someone cannot come with a meaningful one. People do not want to experiment with silly little locals. Locals are not silly. They are actually much more useful than an express 90% of the time. And all of the people that use those locals will disagree with you. I'd rather get squished like a sardine then stop at 65st, Northern Blvd, 46st, Steinway st, 36st, etc. Maybe not, but enough people disagree with you to make the V service useful and viable. The F riders having to transfer to the E just to reach the vital Manhattan stops certainly would rather have the F go to its original destination than to make these obscure stops like Queensbridge and Roosevelt Island. And there goes you childish selfishness again. How about the majority of F line passengers who benefit from the F not stopping at 53rd-lex and 53rd-5th? The new service pattern benefits more F line riders than it hurts. |
|
|
|