|
|
| Re: Tuscarora Dispatch No. 31 - R-40 / R-42 Roll SIgns (1544519) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Tuscarora Dispatch No. 31 - R-40 / R-42 Roll SIgns |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Sat Apr 25 16:10:37 2020, in response to Re: Tuscarora Dispatch No. 31 - R-40 / R-42 Roll SIgns, posted by IRTRedbirdR33 on Sat Apr 25 09:57:02 2020. The cesspool of incompetence that passes for TA upper management and planning has always been extremely short sighted. On the BMT, the name Bway should NEVER have been included on the route signs, only the branch line. Also route signs should have carried both the single and double letter for ALL routes so that both lcl and exp service could be operated on all routes. Common sense dictates that, but nobody ever accused the TA management of having common sense or any sense for that matter. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|