Re: N to 96/2 (1423150) | |||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
Posted by New Flyer #857 on Sat Jan 7 11:59:15 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by italianstallion on Sat Jan 7 11:40:44 2017. But I say the system should be at least comprehensible by a decently-researched first-time rider.For example, even if I've never used the system before, there is enough public literature for me to know, if I wanted to, that I might see an E at 179th if I go there. Right now, there is no reason for me to expect to see a Q on the Sea Beach, and definitely no reason for me to expect that Q to skip DeKalb. If I wasn't on SubChat, I would have no idea what a Q was doing on the Sea Beach line. But I'd understand the other scenarios (2/5 to Utica / New Lots and E to 179th) because they are documented. |