|
|
| Re: N to 96/2 (1423226) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
|
Posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Sat Jan 7 17:34:44 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by Joe V on Sat Jan 7 12:53:30 2017. The best I can say to that is they will have a nice 7 minutes + 7 more minutes to reflect on their listening and observation skills as they backtrack to DeKalb.Fundamentally less people are confused by (Q) Via Sea Beach than there would be with (N) to 96th - 2AV. DeKalb is the only station destination where confusion leading to inconvenience may occur. People who treat the Brooklyn portion like an N will be fine. People confused who stay on the platform will also be fine. Conversely, anyone going to all of the Astoria line stops would be confused by signing them as N. The only valid reason I can think of to keep them labeled N is the schedule data. On a personal note I like anomalies like N to 96th/2nd so I would want them to label them N purely from a railfan perspective. But things that are fun for railfans are rarely good for customers (see: 90% of Wallyhorse's ideas). |
|
|
|