|
|
| Re: DVARP petition for SEPTA regional rail bathrooms (1169421) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: DVARP petition for SEPTA regional rail bathrooms |
|
|
Posted by kp5308 on Sun Jul 29 18:23:15 2012, in response to Re: DVARP petition for SEPTA regional rail bathrooms, posted by WillD on Sun Jul 29 17:40:58 2012. It represents a not insignificant investment of capital budget resources to construct a mini-high, and provides none of the station dwell improvements a full high platform provides.That is not how SEPTA sees it. And in any event, they're now non-compliant as well, so it's not really worth mentioning them in the first place. Sure it is "worth mentioning" because this must be a recent change. Langhorne has one that was built new last year:  Because the bridge plate getting stuck in its holder because the lock has jammed in its months of inactivity is somehow preferable to a piece of equipment on a train which can be brought in, tested, and serviced on a daily basis. According to an employee the plates & their associated hardware are inspected on a regular basis. What "regular" means I don't know but I do believe they are not as neglected as you make them out to be. |
|
|
|