Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach (702033) | |
Home > OTChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
Page 12 of 15 |
(703346) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Dec 3 01:16:52 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Dec 3 00:56:27 2010. For now ... alas, idiots are playing with them now. :( |
|
(703360) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Dec 3 01:50:57 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Dec 3 00:56:27 2010. Yeah, that's exactly what the Iranians are thinking. Keep counting on that, and you're in for a shock. The Iranians aren't daunted by MAD. |
|
(703373) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 03:15:16 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Dec 2 12:38:27 2010. BULLSHIT |
|
(703374) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 03:16:28 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Dec 2 12:44:52 2010. ....and I say you're full of shit, TROLL. |
|
(703375) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 03:17:34 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Dec 2 12:48:44 2010. I hope you don't expect an intelligent response. If any. |
|
(703376) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 03:18:36 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Dec 2 12:57:53 2010. nope, not everyone. |
|
(703377) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 03:21:37 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Dec 2 12:50:47 2010. WOW, homophobia AND racism IN THE SAME POST. You are so transparent, your transparency is nauseating. |
|
(703378) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 03:23:35 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Dec 2 12:54:40 2010. >>>>>Oh, you're an authority on these things, now?<<<<<Didn't you hear? Closet dwellers are an authority on EVERYTHING. |
|
(703380) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 03:24:27 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Dec 2 13:00:26 2010. Changing the subject AGAIN, I see. |
|
(703381) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 03:25:20 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Dec 2 21:23:42 2010. True, unfortunately. |
|
(703382) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 03:27:10 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by The Flxible Neofan on Thu Dec 2 13:01:30 2010. >>>>The idea of the ad is to show this to straight, gay, bi, and questioning people to show these "happy" minority gay couples in a way that's not demeaning or scandelous.<<<<Stop making sense. 8-) |
|
(703383) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 03:27:21 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by The Flxible Neofan on Thu Dec 2 13:01:30 2010. >>>>The idea of the ad is to show this to straight, gay, bi, and questioning people to show these "happy" minority gay couples in a way that's not demeaning or scandalous.<<<<Stop making sense. 8-) |
|
(703384) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 03:28:12 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Dec 2 12:36:39 2010. yeppers |
|
(703392) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 04:02:16 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by Fred G on Thu Dec 2 12:56:20 2010. rotflmao, you're a real pisser. |
|
(703394) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 04:02:45 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Dec 2 21:22:28 2010. WHY???? |
|
(703399) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 04:14:18 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by SMAZ on Thu Dec 2 13:29:56 2010. haha, pwnt. |
|
(703400) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 04:16:12 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by BMTLines on Thu Dec 2 13:33:13 2010. Reference to "my boo-boo". I believe, I don't use it myself. |
|
(703401) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 04:22:21 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by BMTLines on Thu Dec 2 13:33:13 2010. Reference to "my boo-boo". I believe, I don't use it myself."The word boo is a slang word that can mean my baby, its an affection word. It can be used for your sweetheart, anything like that.<<< |
|
(703402) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 04:25:22 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by SMAZ on Thu Dec 2 13:40:27 2010. Catholic mas has loads of vino. It represents Christ's blood. |
|
(703403) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 04:25:55 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by SMAZ on Thu Dec 2 13:40:27 2010. Catholic mass has loads of vino too. It represents Christ's blood. |
|
(703406) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Dec 3 04:29:35 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Dec 3 01:50:57 2010. The Iranians will never develop a THERMOnuclear bomb. |
|
(703418) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Dec 3 04:42:25 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 04:25:55 2010. Really?Wow, that guy must have been wasted 24 hours a day. |
|
(703442) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 06:10:15 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Dec 3 04:42:25 2010. LOL |
|
(703443) | |
Re: EU EU EU Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 06:11:10 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Dec 3 04:29:35 2010. LOL |
|
(703450) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri Dec 3 06:50:40 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 04:22:21 2010. An incredibly annoying word. |
|
(703454) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri Dec 3 07:04:04 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Dec 1 12:48:03 2010. That's fine for a 10 year old but a 45 year old still in fear is arrested development. Hmmm...maybe that explains the general lack of maturity in monotheistic males.your pal, Fred |
|
(703455) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Fri Dec 3 07:05:10 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Dec 2 23:55:30 2010. It's people like Spong that are a major cause of the Anglican schism.And people on the other side. And a schism may be no bad thing. Quite the unbeliever. No, he clearly believes in God, but believes that theism (in a specific philosophical sense defined by Paul Tillich) is not a meaningful way of discussing that concept. |
|
(703457) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Fri Dec 3 07:19:24 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by BMTLines on Fri Dec 3 00:01:04 2010. No, he is one of the few Christians who are actually honest about the realities of the modern world, rather than either creating elaborate theological lies or rejecting reality completely and building creation museums. |
|
(703460) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by Railman718 on Fri Dec 3 08:05:42 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri Dec 3 06:50:40 2010. To you it is to others its not. |
|
(703461) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri Dec 3 08:19:12 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Dec 3 01:50:57 2010. Not even in Lebanon?your pal, Fred |
|
(703463) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 08:31:48 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri Dec 3 06:50:40 2010. why? |
|
(703465) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by BMTLines on Fri Dec 3 08:34:11 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Fri Dec 3 07:19:24 2010. How does he dare call himself a Christian - he does not believe in Christ or the TrinityHe should change the name of his religion to something else - whatever he is preaching is not Christianity by any stretch of the imagination - I'll accept that - what I really dislike are hypocrites who claim that they are one thing but really are something else |
|
(703466) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Dec 3 09:04:58 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by BMTLines on Fri Dec 3 08:34:11 2010. Nothing wrong with not believing in a trinity. There's no "trinity" in the Bible. |
|
(703467) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Dec 3 09:06:57 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Dec 3 04:29:35 2010. With all the help they're getting from Russia and China, you can't say that. They're getting a nuke and that's for sure. The Arabs don't care about Israel vs. "Palestinians" as much as they care about Iran getting the bomb. |
|
(703469) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Dec 3 09:10:20 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by Fred G on Fri Dec 3 08:19:12 2010. Just ask Hezbollah. |
|
(703474) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by AlM on Fri Dec 3 09:33:56 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Dec 3 00:25:35 2010. Exactly. Wait till they discover that even Roman Catholic bishops (not to mention the laity) all practice Cafeteria Catholicism. |
|
(703475) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by AlM on Fri Dec 3 09:36:22 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Dec 3 00:04:30 2010. The Roman Catholic Church in English speaking countries is way to liberal for the conservatives. Horror of horrors, the laity is actually allowed to touch the communion host! And there are altar girls and female eucharistic ministers! |
|
(703478) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri Dec 3 10:08:18 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by Railman718 on Fri Dec 3 08:05:42 2010. And? |
|
(703479) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri Dec 3 10:08:35 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Dec 3 08:31:48 2010. It's the stupidest thing I have ever heard. |
|
(703480) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by Railman718 on Fri Dec 3 10:09:11 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri Dec 3 10:08:18 2010. In other words your opinion... |
|
(703481) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Dec 3 10:09:30 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by AlM on Fri Dec 3 09:36:22 2010. The Roman Catholic Church in English speaking countries is way to(o) liberal for the conservativesPeople are still stuck in this 1980s-era belief. |
|
(703483) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Dec 3 10:12:34 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Fri Dec 3 07:19:24 2010. he is one of the few Christians who are actually honest about the realities of the modern worldNo, he's a liberal. rather than either creating elaborate theological lies or rejecting reality completely Why does science embrace a theory about the universe's beginning that was postulated by a Catholic priest? (Oh yeah, the red shift in stars. They have to.) |
|
(703489) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by JayMan on Fri Dec 3 10:38:06 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by BMTLines on Thu Dec 2 23:51:07 2010. Please by all means do! I'll be in favor... |
|
(703490) | |
Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains |
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri Dec 3 10:40:39 2010, in response to Re: Gay Ads On Subway Trains, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Dec 2 21:22:28 2010. Ehh, no more than other terms of endearment.your pal, Fred |
|
(703492) | |
Re: Burden of Proof (Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach) |
|
Posted by JayMan on Fri Dec 3 10:51:51 2010, in response to Re: Burden of Proof (Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach), posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Thu Dec 2 21:30:25 2010. But the Loch Ness claim isn't unfalsifiable in principle, as one could theoretically scour the entire lake (with sonar or whatever) and find that there is or is not a monster. The latter case is unfalsifiable even in principle, however. |
|
(703500) | |
Re: Burden of Proof (Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach) |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Dec 3 11:40:32 2010, in response to Burden of Proof (Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach), posted by David Fairthorne on Wed Dec 1 20:21:21 2010. According to Karl Popper, a scientific theory must have a means of being falsified; otherwise it doesn't qualify as scientificNo, that's not what empirical falsification is about. The method serves to reject false theories due to their being proven false, not to vindicate them as any kind of legitimate science. |
|
(703504) | |
Re: Burden of Proof (Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach) |
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri Dec 3 11:58:41 2010, in response to Re: Burden of Proof (Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach), posted by Olog-hai on Fri Dec 3 11:40:32 2010. Karl Popper must be on poppers.your pal, Fred |
|
(703507) | |
Re: Burden of Proof (Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach) |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Dec 3 12:05:51 2010, in response to Re: Burden of Proof (Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach), posted by JayMan on Wed Dec 1 21:31:33 2010. That's got to be one of the least scientific posts I've read on this board. You can't prove heliocentrism outside of mathematics neither Aristarchus nor Copernicus nor Galileo did so. Your diatribe about "uncertainty" is way more philosophical than scientific, never mind oxymoronic in other posts, you're just fine with scientific induction, but here you state that proof is demanded for all things in science (which it isn't; nobody's seen a subatomic particle, never mind an atom itself, for example). |
|
(703510) | |
Re: Burden of Proof (Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach) |
|
Posted by JayMan on Fri Dec 3 12:24:36 2010, in response to Re: Burden of Proof (Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach), posted by Olog-hai on Fri Dec 3 12:05:51 2010. You know, it would be wise to seriously educate yourself on science and scientific principles, especially before you criticize others' lack of understanding of these. Before we accept something as physical (i.e., real), we need tangible evidence. Abundant proof (which, is distinct from absolute proof, which is only possible in the world of mathematics) exists for heliocentrism and for atoms and subatomic particles, lest CERN be wasting their money... |
|
(703520) | |
Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach |
|
Posted by JayMan on Fri Dec 3 13:07:56 2010, in response to Re: Atheist Billboard At Lincoln Tunnel Approach, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 1 14:50:40 2010. Well said! |
|
Page 12 of 15 |