|
|
| Michelle Obama Pregnant? (408500) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
Page 1 of 5 |
|
|
| (408500) | |
Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 30 23:19:10 2009 There are now constant and persistent reports that First Lady Michelle Obama is pregnant with the First Couple's third child. FLOTUS is thought to be well into her first trimester, suggesting she became pregnant around Election Day. (That's plausible. Getting elected President would surely be cause for...conjugating...lol!)The last time a sitting President and his wife had a baby was in the early Sixties, JFK and Jackie. Now comes an Obamababy! LOL! |
|
|
| (408501) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by R42 4787 on Fri Jan 30 23:20:18 2009, in response to Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 30 23:19:10 2009. She's 45, a bit too old. |
|
|
| (408503) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 30 23:25:45 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by R42 4787 on Fri Jan 30 23:20:18 2009. Not at all. These days, there are all kinds of regimens and treatments that allow 40+ women to carry a baby to term. Michelle is in exceptionally good health, and her most recent pregnancy occurred when she was 37. If FLOTUS wants to have a baby, there are plenty of specialists who will help her make it happen. |
|
|
| (408505) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Fri Jan 30 23:41:36 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 30 23:25:45 2009. FLOTUS, POTUS, SCOTUS....why exactly are people so infatuated with creating/using "OTUS" acronyms? No offense, but hopefully whatever it is will pass. |
|
|
| (408507) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 30 23:43:30 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Easy on Fri Jan 30 23:41:36 2009. POTUS and FLOTUS are in daily use by both the Secret Service and White House staff. The origins of SCOTUS are a bit murkier, having been attributed to the Law Clerks who staff the Court. |
|
|
| (408512) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jan 30 23:54:32 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Easy on Fri Jan 30 23:41:36 2009. POTEU doesn't have the same kind of ring. Anything "OTUS" is teh roxxorz. |
|
|
| (408558) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Jan 31 01:46:17 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 30 23:43:30 2009. SCOTUS? was dat mean? |
|
|
| (408559) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Jan 31 01:47:15 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jan 30 23:54:32 2009. You and your EU obssesion. |
|
|
| (408581) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Jan 31 02:11:51 2009, in response to Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 30 23:19:10 2009. If so ... GAME OVER for the republicans. :) |
|
|
| (408628) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sat Jan 31 03:14:54 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Jan 31 01:46:17 2009. Supreme Court Of The US. |
|
|
| (408630) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sat Jan 31 03:17:10 2009, in response to Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 30 23:19:10 2009. The last time a sitting President and his wife had a baby was in the early Sixties, JFK and Jackie. Now comes an Obamababy! LOL!JFK was still President-Elect when Jr. was born. |
|
|
| (408641) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Jan 31 03:39:53 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by SMAZ on Sat Jan 31 03:17:10 2009. Obviously, he wasn't SITTING. :) |
|
|
| (408651) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sat Jan 31 03:53:27 2009, in response to Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 30 23:19:10 2009. LOL, FLOTUS?your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (408691) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Jan 31 06:41:33 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by SMAZ on Sat Jan 31 03:14:54 2009. Thank, I call them the supremes.
|
|
|
| (408692) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Jan 31 06:42:25 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Fred G on Sat Jan 31 03:53:27 2009. dOES THAT FLOATUS YOUR BOATUS? 8-) |
|
|
| (408709) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sat Jan 31 07:00:55 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Jan 31 06:42:25 2009. Sure, just as long as it doesn't give me FLATUS :Dyour pal, Fred |
|
|
| (408731) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Jeff Rosen on Sat Jan 31 08:01:15 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Easy on Fri Jan 30 23:41:36 2009. I agree with you. Almost as annoying as using the phonetic words for the subway lines on the SubChat side. Did they use them when the lines were double lettered? The bravo-bravo? At least they can't do that with the IRT. |
|
|
| (408733) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Images on Sat Jan 31 08:22:20 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Fred G on Sat Jan 31 07:00:55 2009. Sure, just as long as it doesn't give me FLATUS :DANYBODY HERE FOR WHITE CASTLE ?  Bill "Newkirk" |
|
|
| (408736) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Sat Jan 31 08:31:54 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Jan 31 03:39:53 2009. Maybe they BOTH were. :-) |
|
|
| (408766) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Sat Jan 31 10:10:50 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by MJF on Sat Jan 31 08:31:54 2009. Likely she was laying down. ;-) |
|
|
| (408773) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Sat Jan 31 10:23:38 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Jan 31 06:41:33 2009. Those ladies could sing. |
|
|
| (408793) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Jan 31 10:53:04 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Jeff Rosen on Sat Jan 31 08:01:15 2009. What rong with using phonetic pronunciation for letters . Cops do it, as you would know. Avoids confusion and mistakes. |
|
|
| (408794) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Jan 31 10:54:20 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Newkirk Images on Sat Jan 31 08:22:20 2009. mmmmm....White Castle |
|
|
| (408826) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Peter Rosa on Sat Jan 31 11:58:55 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 30 23:25:45 2009. These days, there are all kinds of regimens and treatments that allow 40+ women to carry a baby to term.According to the Conventional Wisdom of the Blogosphere (see, for example, the comments to A Notorious Sex-Related Blog) all women become dried-up scags, as barren as the Sahara Desert, soon after hitting 30 if not before. As a result, once again according to this Wisdom, women should start churning out as many babies as possible starting in their early 20's ... that is, high-IQ white Christian women should do so. Otherwise we'll be outbred by the wetbacks (bad) or the towel heads (even worse), and White Civilization will be doomed. Really, I'm not making this up, I'm describing the sort of thinking that pervades the blogosphere. My LIRR/NYCT blog |
|
|
| (408841) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Jan 31 12:27:25 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by cortelyounext on Sat Jan 31 10:23:38 2009. Say Amen and hallelujah! |
|
|
| (408881) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Jan 31 15:47:46 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Jan 31 02:11:51 2009. Depends on who the father is, wouldn't you say? |
|
|
| (408882) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Jan 31 15:48:49 2009, in response to Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 30 23:19:10 2009. Does that now make it "Erection Day" |
|
|
| (408883) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Sat Jan 31 15:54:16 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Train Dude on Sat Jan 31 15:48:49 2009. LOL! |
|
|
| (408884) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sat Jan 31 15:54:51 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Train Dude on Sat Jan 31 15:47:46 2009. Fox will let us know. |
|
|
| (408924) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jan 31 17:32:45 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Easy on Sat Jan 31 15:54:51 2009. Hmm, more attempts at media stigmatization. |
|
|
| (408931) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jan 31 17:43:01 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Jan 31 01:47:15 2009. It's not an obsession; it's bringing news about the large totalitarian state that's trying to pass itself off as a democracy. If anything, people ought to be talking about the obsessions of the people working here: That's the Berlyamont Building in Brussels, where the EU Commission works. They are an unelected body that has sole power to initiate legislation in the European Union, and can even pass laws without the elected European Parliament (they're officially the "executive body" of the EU, and force German-style laws on every other member state of the EU). Yes, this will affect the lives of Americans. It already does, in fact, whether you realize it or not. The EU Commission has been imposing a lot of their arbitrary decrees on the US related to business and international trade. |
|
|
| (408936) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Jan 31 17:50:48 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jan 31 17:43:01 2009. meh |
|
|
| (408939) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sat Jan 31 17:53:56 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jan 31 17:32:45 2009. Nope. That's not where I was aiming. |
|
|
| (408954) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Jeff Rosen on Sat Jan 31 18:23:40 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Jan 31 10:53:04 2009. Nothing wrong at all, at work, but not on a forum with a lot of non-employees. |
|
|
| (408956) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Jan 31 18:25:13 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Train Dude on Sat Jan 31 15:47:46 2009. Are you suggesting that she sat on one of Bill Clinton's uncleaned commodes? :) |
|
|
| (408957) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Jan 31 18:27:16 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Jeff Rosen on Sat Jan 31 18:23:40 2009. I see your point now. Agreed. |
|
|
| (408958) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Jan 31 18:28:36 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by MJF on Sat Jan 31 08:31:54 2009. Decided to go pull my copy of Kama Sutra from the library. Unfortunately, all I have is the Microsoft Press edition ...
|
|
|
| (408959) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Sat Jan 31 18:29:27 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Jeff Rosen on Sat Jan 31 08:01:15 2009. I actually loved some of the creative phonemes they came up with for the double-lettered lines, back in the day:AA = All Aboard CC = Coca Cola GG = Gorgeous George LL = Latin Lover There were others, but I have to try and remember them... |
|
|
| (408961) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Jan 31 18:42:55 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jan 31 17:32:45 2009. Racists hate have an unreasonable hatred of FOX |
|
|
| (408962) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sat Jan 31 18:45:29 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Train Dude on Sat Jan 31 18:42:55 2009. Ignorants lame type silly sentences incomprehensible. |
|
|
| (408966) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? corrected |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Jan 31 18:49:56 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Train Dude on Sat Jan 31 18:42:55 2009. Racist haters have an unreasonable hatred of FOX |
|
|
| (408967) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Jan 31 18:50:47 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Jan 31 18:25:13 2009. I just hope another "unclean" blue dress doesn't show up :) |
|
|
| (408968) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Jan 31 18:53:19 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Train Dude on Sat Jan 31 18:42:55 2009. Kewl! Hey kids! John Roberts is a subchatter! :) |
|
|
| (408969) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Jan 31 18:54:29 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Train Dude on Sat Jan 31 18:50:47 2009. Somehow, I don't see that bring a problem here ... |
|
|
| (408970) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Jan 31 19:10:23 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Jan 31 18:54:29 2009. I assume that (QU)easy will point out your type-O so there is no point in me doing it as well. |
|
|
| (408973) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Jan 31 19:17:48 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Train Dude on Sat Jan 31 19:10:23 2009. Atsa OK boss ... I get paid by the wurd. :) |
|
|
| (408979) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? corrected |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sat Jan 31 19:30:50 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? corrected, posted by Train Dude on Sat Jan 31 18:49:56 2009. Well that didn't go well. I was actually attempting to criticize your statement, not Fox.What makes you say that I'm a racist or a hater? |
|
|
| (408981) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Jan 31 19:33:46 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant?, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jan 31 17:32:45 2009. Some media deserve to be stigmatized. |
|
|
| (408982) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? corrected |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Jan 31 19:35:00 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? corrected, posted by Train Dude on Sat Jan 31 18:49:56 2009. I assume that by "racist haters" you mean people who hate racists. |
|
|
| (408985) | |
Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? corrected |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sat Jan 31 19:38:26 2009, in response to Re: Michelle Obama Pregnant? corrected, posted by italianstallion on Sat Jan 31 19:35:00 2009. uh oh. Looks like he needs another correction. ;) |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 5 |
|