Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4 5]

< Previous Page  

Page 2 of 5

Next Page >  

(1475039)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Nov 10 06:48:55 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Nov 10 06:45:34 2017.

I know you didn't. Calling somebody who is a man her is like me calling my TV remote control mr. I don't know what people think that they should be called a title because they feel in their mind they identify with it, even though science and vision says otherwise. I am not a female. I am a male. You could throw me in a dress and makeup like Klinger and that does not magically make me a female. Just like that Shawn King Guy and that Dolenz chick wanting to be black at identifying this black, doesn't make them black! That's something you have to be born as!

Post a New Response

(1475040)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Nov 10 06:49:48 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Nov 10 06:48:55 2017.

And as far as the training thing is concerned, it's not a slur. And anybody who thinks it is, Cowboy Up, motherfuka! LOL LOL

Post a New Response

(1475041)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 06:49:52 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Nov 10 06:00:21 2017.

So you reject science, fluffy? What I stated was factual and scientifically correct. Cut the body off of a Ford pinto and weld a mustang body to the chassis, you still don't have a mustang. The DNA of this individual is what it was no matter how you surgically alter the body.

The puke inducing fact is that you see this surgery as somehow a qualifying factor for this person to hold office. I am hardly anti-LGBTQ. I don't care what anyone elses sexual preference is other than my own or my partner's. I just disagree that this anti-science qualifies a person for office any more than your deification of it puts you on the side of the Angels. FYF

Post a New Response

(1475043)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 06:56:03 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Nov 10 06:45:34 2017.

Well, I too have recently transitioned. I am now British Royalty. From this point on I wish to be referred to as, "SIR JAMES."

Post a New Response

(1475047)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Nov 10 07:17:27 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 06:49:52 2017.

It is science and facts, but in 2017, you should know as well as anybody, facts don't matter.

Post a New Response

(1475051)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 07:34:15 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Nov 10 07:17:27 2017.

Yes, fact. If this person were to commit a violent crime in the near future and leave behind blood or hair evidence, when the police analyze the evidence, they will be looking for a male suspect regardless of what the drivers license says.

Post a New Response

(1475052)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 07:34:18 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Nov 10 07:17:27 2017.

Yes, fact. If this person were to commit a violent crime in the near future and leave behind blood or hair evidence, when the police analyze the evidence, they will be looking for a male suspect regardless of what the drivers license says.

Post a New Response

(1475054)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Nov 10 07:39:47 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 06:49:52 2017.

Cut the body off of a Ford pinto and weld a mustang body to the chassis, you still don't have a mustang

Well, the Mustang II was based on the Pinto platform, so Ford already did exactly that in 1973. But lots of people (including me) don't regard that one as a real Mustang.

Post a New Response

(1475059)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by Fred G on Fri Nov 10 07:50:07 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Nov 10 07:39:47 2017.

That wasn't a 'stang and the 70's were awful Ford years. Pinto - Capri - Granada, et al.

Post a New Response

(1475061)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by bingbong on Fri Nov 10 07:55:10 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Nov 10 02:34:12 2017.

That dish has passed.🙂

Post a New Response

(1475089)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by Dave on Fri Nov 10 09:29:36 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 06:56:03 2017.

I'll call you, "Sir Loin of Beef." Or would you prefer "Sir Osis of the Liver"?

Post a New Response

(1475090)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by Dave on Fri Nov 10 09:31:29 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Nov 10 07:39:47 2017.

That's because it wasn't. It was yawn-inducing to say the least.

Post a New Response

(1475109)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Nov 10 10:07:08 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 07:34:15 2017.

You obviously don't realize that there are males with XX chromosomes and females with XY chromosomes who look completely normal, don't realize that they have a genetic condition until they fail to hit puberty and have to visit a doctor and until the later 20th century, would not have not have known at all that they have a genetic condition.

Determining sex based on genotype doesn't make sense at all. Of course a hateful degenerate like you would ignore facts.

Post a New Response

(1475136)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by orange blossom special on Fri Nov 10 11:31:21 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Nov 9 19:50:43 2017.

Because Amazon...er the "post"(insert beavis and butthead laugh here) had a fill in the blank article that they use for every such election.

Then not doing such a mad libs story on the less surprising Jones is the real story of corruption.


She must've been in a coma to skip every surpreme court election, judgeship, etc for 4 decades. The Chief Justice is only the highest paid public servent in Ala.

Post a New Response

(1475145)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 12:30:36 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Nov 10 10:07:08 2017.

DNA is science. Gender identity is liberal voodoo. Misanthropes like you deny science.

Post a New Response

(1475163)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Nov 10 12:47:39 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 12:30:36 2017.

Yep.

Post a New Response

(1475167)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Nov 10 12:51:03 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 12:30:36 2017.

Gender identity is real. So are XX males and XY females.

And even if you consider gender dysphoria or whatever its called to be a mental disorder, mental disorders exist too, even if you don't know how they work.

Post a New Response

(1475211)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 14:50:58 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Nov 10 12:51:03 2017.

According to the literature, Bruce Jenner has XY chromosome. Same for Bradley Manning. So even if I were to accept your argument, the 2 most recnt high profile cases seem not to support your claim.

Post a New Response

(1475216)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Nov 10 15:08:02 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 14:50:58 2017.

What claim? Where have I ever claimed that Caitlyn Jenner and Chelsea Manning have anything other than XY chromosomes?

Post a New Response

(1475226)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Nov 10 15:31:35 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Nov 10 15:08:02 2017.

Who are those people? Aliases? Are they superheroes and that's their superhero names?

Post a New Response

(1475235)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Nov 10 16:32:57 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Nov 10 15:31:35 2017.

They changed their names, as is their right.

Post a New Response

(1475245)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by mtk52983 on Fri Nov 10 17:13:24 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Nov 10 15:31:35 2017.

If one legally changes their name, I am callling that person by his/her new legal name regardless of what his/her birth name is.

Post a New Response

(1475247)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 17:16:58 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Nov 10 15:08:02 2017.

The claim that gender identity is a science. In science the results are repeatable and prove able.

Post a New Response

(1475249)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 17:31:26 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Nov 10 15:08:02 2017.

To elaborate; The family policy institute published on June 2, 2015 that despite surgery etc. Bruce/Caitlin Jenner is genetically still a man. Where is the genetic science that led to Jenner's sex reassignment surgery?

Post a New Response

(1475252)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Nov 10 17:59:32 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 17:16:58 2017.

Here is some gender identity science for you.

Condescending dismissal of link in 3...2...1...

Post a New Response

(1475254)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 18:21:05 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Nov 10 17:59:32 2017.

No JZ. I looked at your link. The These are unsubstantiated claims of research that has not been verified or duplicated. On the other hand, I cited 2 well known examples that call into question, Pigs citing of the chromosome issue. That was the theory that I was responding to. Show me more studies like the one you linked to,which come to the same hypothesis and I'll be more interested.

Post a New Response

(1475256)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Nov 10 19:06:07 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 18:21:05 2017.

"Unsubstantiated"?????

It's a peer-reviewed academic study, carried out by researchers at a medical school.


Post a New Response

(1475257)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Fri Nov 10 19:25:46 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 17:31:26 2017.

I wonder how that works come pension time? I worked with a guy named Mark & after gender re-assignment surgery he became Marsha. I'd overhear her talking to the RR retirement people and always refer to her original sex as "When I was known by another name" when benefits distribution was discussed.
Would sex change be simply treated simply as a name change when it came time to collect retirement benefits?

Just wonderin.


Post a New Response

(1475258)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by AlM on Fri Nov 10 19:47:49 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Fri Nov 10 19:25:46 2017.

Arizona v Norris says a retirement plan can't give a different benefit based on your gender. So the answer is it doesn't matter. They process your name change and pay you the same benefit as before.


Post a New Response

(1475259)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 20:42:55 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Nov 10 19:06:07 2017.

Tell me this then. Did Bruce Jenner have this alleged miswire? Did Bradley Manning have this alleged miswire?

Post a New Response

(1475260)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 20:45:58 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Nov 10 19:06:07 2017.

By the way, where were the results of this study duplicated to verify the results. If true, the results should be repeatable every time.

Post a New Response

(1475261)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by jimmymc25 on Fri Nov 10 20:49:05 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by mtk52983 on Fri Nov 10 17:13:24 2017.

Same here...it's only right.

Post a New Response

(1475267)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Nov 10 22:05:00 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 18:21:05 2017.

I’m not arguing one way or another whether gender identity is legitimate. I am only arguing that genotype is not and has never been the definitive definition of human sex distinctions.

Post a New Response

(1475270)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Nov 10 22:08:37 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 17:31:26 2017.

The family policy institute sounds like a hate group.

What is “genetically still a man?” Are all people with AIS genetically men? Answer that.

Post a New Response

(1475274)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Nov 10 22:13:18 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 20:42:55 2017.

Funny thing is, "miswire" indicates something physically wrong. Doesn't jibe with the notion that transgenderism is something normal.

Post a New Response

(1475277)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Nov 10 22:14:33 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Nov 10 16:32:57 2017.

Attention whores.

Post a New Response

(1475283)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Nov 10 22:22:16 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by jimmymc25 on Fri Nov 10 20:49:05 2017.

I've never been into that.

Post a New Response

(1475284)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Nov 10 22:25:56 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Nov 10 22:08:37 2017.

A "hate group"?

Post a New Response

(1475289)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 23:04:31 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Nov 10 22:05:00 2017.

You're not arguing one way or the other but made disparaging remarks about me for my opinion.

Post a New Response

(1475290)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 10 23:06:46 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Nov 10 22:08:37 2017.

Sounds like a hate group? Black lives matter sounds like a hate group!

Post a New Response

(1475291)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Fri Nov 10 23:09:45 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by AlM on Fri Nov 10 19:47:49 2017.

Ok Thanks!

Post a New Response

(1475294)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Nov 11 00:03:25 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Nov 10 22:25:56 2017.

Heh. Sounds like how the SPLC defines "hate groups".

Post a New Response

(1475300)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by Fred G on Sat Nov 11 06:50:10 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Nov 10 22:08:37 2017.

The family policy Institute is an anti-LGBT group. Obviously they’re gonna say anti-LGBT things. I hope nobody’s presenting them as some kind of Scientific evidence.

Post a New Response

(1475301)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by JayZeeBMT on Sat Nov 11 07:09:09 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by Fred G on Sat Nov 11 06:50:10 2017.

R2 Chinatown is.

Post a New Response

(1475305)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 11 08:10:34 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by JayZeeBMT on Sat Nov 11 07:09:09 2017.

So far you have provided nothing. Show me where Bradley Manning or Bruce Jenner were found to have a documented instance of the condition you are suggesting.

Post a New Response

(1475308)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 11 08:17:57 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Nov 10 22:25:56 2017.

They are.

Post a New Response

(1475311)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 11 08:20:51 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 11 08:17:57 2017.

But you think everything and everyone is a hate group!

Post a New Response

(1475312)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 11 08:23:26 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 11 08:20:51 2017.

No, she just finds any group who's agenda she doesn't support to be a hate group and anyone who doesn't agree with her to be a hater. No wonder her former husband was so pussy whipped.

Post a New Response

(1475315)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 11 08:31:43 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 11 08:23:26 2017.

Which is more or less, everything!

Post a New Response

(1475324)

view threaded

Re: Roy Moore

Posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 11 09:16:23 2017, in response to Re: Roy Moore, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 11 08:31:43 2017.

Hardly.

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4 5]

< Previous Page  

Page 2 of 5

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]