Re: National hero? (1473410) | |
Home > OTChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
Page 2 of 3 |
(1473735) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by AlM on Sat Nov 4 08:57:55 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 08:57:12 2017. I WANT them to have a strong candidate that appeals to masses, not just the far leftWhom do you suggest? |
|
(1473736) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 08:58:03 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 4 08:45:16 2017. Yes. But look who the Democrats lost to. That says world's. |
|
(1473737) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 08:58:32 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 08:43:09 2017. Democrats delusion. |
|
(1473738) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 4 09:05:54 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 08:44:44 2017. It's needed now more than ever. |
|
(1473739) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 4 09:06:26 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 08:58:03 2017. Exactly! I miss saying that the whole time! They lost to a WWE character |
|
(1473740) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 4 09:07:48 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by AlM on Sat Nov 4 08:57:55 2017. I already predicted it after I watched the Democratic Convention last summer, Cory Booker will be the Democratic candidate, whether or not right now he says he wants to run, he will run. |
|
(1473741) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by AlM on Sat Nov 4 09:13:57 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 4 09:07:48 2017. I asked whom Chris is suggesting, not whom he's predicting. |
|
(1473742) | |
Re: National hero |
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 09:19:32 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 02:19:34 2017. In your opinion? Given your track record of being wrong, your opinion is worthless. |
|
(1473753) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 10:31:09 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 08:44:44 2017. So then when you felt that it wasn't necessary then nobody did and now that you feel that it is necessary, the majority also feels as you do? Don't you think that's pretty narsacistic considering that you are almost always wrong? |
|
(1473764) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 10:59:59 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 08:43:09 2017. Democrats delusion. |
|
(1473766) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 11:05:10 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by AlM on Sat Nov 4 09:13:57 2017. They have to come up with it. I have no idea, but they push the Elizabeth Warren types.The Republicans have issue too... |
|
(1473767) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Nov 4 11:09:15 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 11:05:10 2017. The Republicans have issue tooYes; mostly for being too far left themselves. |
|
(1473769) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Nov 4 11:12:18 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 4 03:25:26 2017. It's procedurally acceptable, but that doesn't make it right. |
|
(1473770) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Nov 4 11:13:22 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 08:06:24 2017. The founders did not intend every state to even have a popular vote. |
|
(1473771) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Nov 4 11:21:22 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 08:58:32 2017. No, fact. |
|
(1473781) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 4 11:29:53 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Nov 4 11:12:18 2017. It saved us from having that snake as president! |
|
(1473784) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 11:32:23 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Nov 4 11:21:22 2017. No! If it were fact then it wouldn't have come from bingbong. |
|
(1473785) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by Fred G on Sat Nov 4 11:32:44 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 4 08:45:53 2017. yeah you're wrong if you think the electoral college wasn't borne of slavery. |
|
(1473786) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by Fred G on Sat Nov 4 11:33:12 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 08:58:32 2017. No it's true. 3/5 compromise. |
|
(1473791) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Nov 4 11:40:22 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 4 11:29:53 2017. Which would have been preferable to the current nightmare. |
|
(1473793) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Nov 4 11:48:10 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 11:32:23 2017. That's specious reasoning. |
|
(1473795) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 11:54:24 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Nov 4 11:48:10 2017. The law of averages is on my side, none the less. |
|
(1473797) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 12:09:20 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Nov 4 11:40:22 2017. Only to the unhinged left. As bad as the right was with Obama, they weren't even near as bad as the left has been the past year |
|
(1473798) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Nov 4 12:12:45 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 12:09:20 2017. Because Obama wasn't actually a bad president to anyone who wasn't already unhinged. |
|
(1473801) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 12:14:48 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Nov 4 12:12:45 2017. That is up for debate. While far from ideal, Trump isn't nearly as bad as the Left has proclaimed |
|
(1473803) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Nov 4 12:23:34 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 12:14:48 2017. Trump is actually a bad president. Even members of Congress from his own party agree he is extremely unqualified. |
|
(1473804) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Nov 4 12:30:53 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 12:09:20 2017. As bad as the right was with ObamaAs "bad"? Reporting the bad things he did was "bad"? Or are you talking about the pseudo-right left who deliberately obsessed over his skin color? |
|
(1473807) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 12:33:53 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Nov 4 12:23:34 2017. You mean the Congress that has a lower approval rating that the President? That Congress? |
|
(1473810) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 12:37:24 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Nov 4 12:30:53 2017. The left tried to paint any opposition to him as racial. Ridiculous |
|
(1473817) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Nov 4 12:45:07 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 12:37:24 2017. We don't hear too much from Janeane Garofalo these days. She explicitly stated that any opposition to him was "hating a black man in the White House". |
|
(1473823) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 13:01:56 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Nov 4 12:45:07 2017. I thought that he was at least half white. If so, maybe he was actually criticized because people thought that his policies sucked. |
|
(1473827) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Nov 4 13:18:16 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 13:01:56 2017. Well, he is. But he doesn't seem to like that half of himself, and hinted at that many times in his books. |
|
(1473828) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 13:19:04 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Nov 4 13:18:16 2017. Self hating racist. |
|
(1473841) | |
Re: National hero |
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 14:38:57 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 09:19:32 2017. The number of Americans actually leaving the country, as ex-citizens is at a record level. Based on your chooing to insult instead of considering that fact, you demonstrate you don't think there's anything to it. That is far more telling than an inaccurate subjective judgment of "wrong" about an opinion, which can be neither right nor wrong by nature. So fuck you very much. |
|
(1473843) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 14:50:48 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 10:31:09 2017. Not only do you not understand what narcissistic is, you can't even spell it. LOL! |
|
(1473846) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 15:33:23 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 10:59:59 2017. Fact. Sorry, but this is what it is. Denying it is the delusion. |
|
(1473848) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 15:45:31 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 4 09:05:54 2017. No it isn't. It should have been done away with after the south LOST the Civil War, and the need to balance free and slave populations became obsolete. Gues nobody hought of it, since u til this century it was little than a precedural anomaly that served little to no purpose. Now that its dangers have been dmonstratede, it's time to do what should have been done years ago....eliminate it. It is a threat to democracy. |
|
(1473850) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 15:46:46 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 11:54:24 2017. No, it isn't. |
|
(1473851) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 15:48:04 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 13:01:56 2017. He's a racist, so he hates that side. |
|
(1473853) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Nov 4 16:07:13 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 15:48:04 2017. So much for you being a moderate. |
|
(1473854) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 16:17:06 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 12:14:48 2017. You're not a woman. Fact is trump has been far worse than even bush was. |
|
(1473855) | |
Re: National hero |
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 16:24:48 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 14:38:57 2017. I've told you numerous times, no. I don't want to fuck you. I prefer women. But where is your proof of your claim. Seems like just more bingbong bullshit to me. |
|
(1473856) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 16:26:40 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 14:50:48 2017. What was that, porky who claims her spelling errors on keyboard failure. |
|
(1473857) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 16:28:31 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 15:46:46 2017. WABB |
|
(1473858) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 16:29:23 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 16:17:06 2017. Neither are you, porky. |
|
(1473859) | |
Re: National hero |
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 16:35:36 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 16:24:48 2017. No, you go do that for yourslf, as your demonic lieutenant bannon aptly described. Now.Proof? CBS. LOL, like you ever have any. Stop clicking facebook ads. |
|
(1473861) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by R30A on Sat Nov 4 16:38:18 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 4 12:14:48 2017. As one of those with an unhinged view of Obama, you have no frame of reference. |
|
(1473862) | |
Re: National hero |
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 16:48:28 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 16:35:36 2017. Hey,you were the one who brought up the issue of sex. I just don't find you appealing. |
|
(1473863) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 16:49:36 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 16:26:40 2017. Read what I wrote. It's about far more than a typo. Go do as bannon would want. |
|
(1473864) | |
Re: National hero? |
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 16:50:10 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Nov 4 16:28:31 2017. Nope. No proof. Go do as bannon would want. |
|
Page 2 of 3 |