Home · Maps · About
Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8]

< Previous Page  

Page 4 of 8

Next Page >  

(1284198)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 28 22:39:27 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by gp38/r42 chris on Tue Apr 28 19:20:45 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
That's precisely what she said. And the crip/blood/BGF thugs took her at her word, too.

Post a New Response

(1284199)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by FtGreeneG on Tue Apr 28 22:39:36 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by LuchAAA on Mon Apr 27 19:01:57 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Come on if watch the footage most of the protestors were peaceful. The organizers, family of Grey spoke for peaceful demonstrations and the media that actually attempt to be unbaised has stated most of the protesters were peaceful.

Post a New Response

(1284201)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by FtGreeneG on Tue Apr 28 22:42:56 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by gp38/r42 chris on Tue Apr 28 19:37:43 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The same way the right is obsessed with Al Sharpton...

Post a New Response

(1284203)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 28 22:45:30 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by LuchAAA on Mon Apr 27 19:01:57 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Correct. "This riot is brought to you by Crips Inc., Bloods Inc., and the Black Guerilla Family LLC. Donate your pound of flesh* today!"

* Not a Merchant of Venice reference.

Post a New Response

(1284207)

view threaded

Salon: Baltimore violence, especially wrecking cop cars, is "legitimate political strategy"

Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 28 22:54:03 2015, in response to Baltimore mayor gave "space" to those who "wished to destroy", posted by Olog-hai on Mon Apr 27 18:44:54 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Advocating Marxist violent revolution used to be treason.

And it's coming out in some sources that Freddie Gray's spinal condition was pre-existing.
Tuesday, Apr 28, 2015 05:15 PM EDT

Baltimore’s violent protesters are right: Smashing police cars is a legitimate political strategy

It's crucial to see non-violence as a tactic, not a philosophy. If it fails to win people over, it's a futile tactic

Benji Hart
As a nation, we fail to comprehend Black political strategy in much the same way we fail to recognize the value of Black life.

We see ghettos and crime and absent parents where we should see communities actively struggling against mental health crises and premeditated economic exploitation. And when we see police cars being smashed and corporate property being destroyed, we should see reasonable responses to generations of extreme state violence, and logical decisions about what kind of actions yield the desired political results.

I’m overwhelmed by the pervasive slandering of protesters in Baltimore this weekend for not remaining peaceful. The bad-apple rhetoric would have us believe that most Baltimore protesters are demonstrating the right way—as is their constitutional right—and only a few are disrupting the peace, giving the movement a bad name.

This spin should be disregarded, first because of the virtual media blackout of any of the action happening on the ground, particularly over the weekend. Equally, it makes no sense to cite the Constitution in any demonstration for Black civil rights (that document was not written about us, remember?), but certainly not one organized specifically to call attention to the fact that the state breaks its own laws with regard to the oppressed on a nearly constant basis.

But there is an even bigger problem. Referring to Black Lives Matter protests, as well as organic responses to police and state violence as “non-violent” or “peaceful” erases the actual climate in which these movements are acting, the militant strategies that have rendered them effective, and the long history of riots and direct action on which they are built.

I do not advocate non-violence—particularly in a moment like the one we currently face. In the spirit and words of militant Black and Brown feminist movements from around the globe, I believe it is crucial that we see non-violence as a tactic, not a philosophy.

Non-violence is a type of political performance designed to raise awareness and win over sympathy of those with privilege. When those on the outside of struggle—the white, the wealthy, the straight, the able-bodied, the masculine—have demonstrated repeatedly that they do not care, are not invested, are not going to step in the line of fire to defend the oppressed, this is a futile political strategy. It not only fails to meet the needs of the community, but actually puts oppressed people in further danger of violence.

The political goals of rioters in Baltimore are not unclear—just as they were not unclear when poor, Black people rioted in Ferguson last fall. When the free market, real estate, the elected government, the legal system have all shown you they are not going to protect you—in fact, that they are the sources of the greatest violence you face—then political action becomes about stopping the machine that is trying to kill you, even if only for a moment, getting the boot off your neck, even if it only allows you a second of air. This is exactly what blocking off streets, disrupting white consumerism, and destroying state property are designed to do.

Black people know this, and have employed these tactics for a very, very long time. Calling them uncivilized, and encouraging them to mind the Constitution is racist, and as an argument fails to ground itself not only in the violent political reality in which Black people find themselves, but also in our centuries-long tradition of resistance, one that has taught effective strategies for militance and direct action to virtually every other current movement for justice.

And while I don’t believe that every protester involved in attacking police cars and corporate storefronts had the same philosophy, or did what they did for the same reasons, it cannot be discounted that when there is a larger national outcry in defense of plate-glass windows and car doors than for Black young people, a point is being made. When there is more concern for white sports fans in the vicinity of a riot than the Black people facing off with police, there is mounting justification for the rage and pain of Black communities in this country.

Acknowledging all of this, I do think events this weekend in Baltimore raise important questions for future direct and militant action in all of our movements. In addition to articulating our goals, crafting our messaging and type of action, we need to think carefully about what the longer term results of militant action might potentially be. Strategies I might suggest, and important questions I think we should try and answer as we plan or find ourselves involved in political actions are these:
  • Are we harming state and private property, or are we harming people, communities and natural resources? Is the result of our action disrupting state and corporate violence, or creating collateral damage that more oppressed people will have to deal with (i.e., Black families and business owners, cleaning staff, etc.)? Are we mimicking state violence by harming people and the environment, or are we harming state property in ways that can stop or slow violence? Are we demonizing systems or people?

  • Who is in the vicinity? Are we doing harm to people around us as we act? Is there a possibility of violence for those who are not the intended targets of our action? Are we forcing people to be involved in an action who many not want to be, or who are not ready?

  • Who is involved in the action? Are people involved in our action consensually, or simply because they are in the vicinity? Have we created ways for people of all abilities who may not want to be present to leave? Are we being strategic about location and placement of bodies? If there are violent repercussions for our actions, who will be facing them?
We should attempt to answer as many of these questions as possible before action occurs, in the planning stages if possible. We also need backup plans and options for changing our actions in the moment if any of the agreed-upon conditions are not the same when it comes time to act.

I rolled my eyes when inquiries in Ferguson “shockingly” revealed racist emails sent throughout local government, including higher-ups in the Police Department. I think many of us knew the inquiry of virtually any police department would yield almost identical findings. The riots in Baltimore have many drawing parallels between policy and conduct in both cities now. What kind of action brought to light for the less affected what Black people have always known? What kinds of actions will it take to make it widely understood that all policing is racist terror, and justice can only come with its permanent abolition?

Black power, Queer power, power to Baltimore, and to all oppressed people who know what time it is.

Post a New Response

(1284208)

view threaded

Re: Benji Hart: Baltimore violence, especially wrecking cop cars, is ''legitimate political strategy''

Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Apr 28 22:56:31 2015, in response to Salon: Baltimore violence, especially wrecking cop cars, is "legitimate political strategy", posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 28 22:54:03 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I don't know who that is and I don't care what he has to say.

Post a New Response

(1284210)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Fred G on Tue Apr 28 22:58:25 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 28 22:30:39 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Who says otherwise?

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(1284211)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Fred G on Tue Apr 28 22:59:16 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by FtGreeneG on Tue Apr 28 22:42:56 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Obama lol

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(1284216)

view threaded

Re: Benji Hart: Baltimore violence, especially wrecking cop cars, is ''legitimate political strategy''

Posted by Fred G on Tue Apr 28 23:23:55 2015, in response to Re: Benji Hart: Baltimore violence, especially wrecking cop cars, is ''legitimate political strategy'', posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Apr 28 22:56:31 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
He's the Olog-hai of the urban set.

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(1284222)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by italianstallion on Tue Apr 28 23:37:14 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Apr 28 16:48:41 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
How does he know? Because the mayor explained it.

Why would any mayor want her city destroyed?

Post a New Response

(1284223)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 28 23:38:00 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 28 22:39:27 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Heh. Because as we all know, thugs do exactly what politicians tell them to do. Lulz

Post a New Response

(1284224)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 28 23:38:33 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Apr 28 19:21:39 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
If you watched the media though, you'd think the city was burning from end to end. That was my point.

Post a New Response

(1284225)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Fred G on Tue Apr 28 23:38:45 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 28 23:38:00 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
As a crip, he should know :)

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(1284226)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by italianstallion on Tue Apr 28 23:39:54 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Apr 28 17:36:52 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
If she really wanted to allow them to destroy the city, she wouldn't "backpedal" her comment, now, would she? She would double down on it.

Post a New Response

(1284227)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 28 23:43:33 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Apr 28 19:25:01 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Whoops! I meant to reply to Salaam back there. :)

Post a New Response

(1284228)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by FtGreeneG on Tue Apr 28 23:50:47 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by Fred G on Tue Apr 28 22:59:16 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Can't forget get about the Right's Antichrist aka obama...lol

Post a New Response

(1284229)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 28 23:51:01 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by gp38/r42 chris on Tue Apr 28 19:37:43 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Clearly your "other" sources are reprinting it.

Post a New Response

(1284230)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor INADVERTENTLY gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by italianstallion on Tue Apr 28 23:51:02 2015, in response to Baltimore mayor gave "space" to those who "wished to destroy", posted by Olog-hai on Mon Apr 27 18:44:54 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The mayor said "Because while we try to make sure that they were protected from the cars and other things that were going on, we also gave those who wished to destroy space to do that as well. "

This is very clear, and unremarkable.

What she is saying is simply that, by reason of allowing the peaceful protestors to have room to express themselves, the EFFECT was to allow space for the thugs to destroy. It was not her INTENT to do so - why would a mayor want her city destroyed? She is just saying the destruction was a RESULT of allowing the protests. Her mistake was in leaving out a word like "inadvertently" in her statement -- like "we also INADVERTENTLY gave those who wished to destroy space to do that as well." That would have been better.

In the heat of the moment, politicians -- indeed anyone -- can say inartful things.

How do I know her intent? 1) She later explained her reasoning. 2) It is absurd to believe a mayor would condone the destruction of her city.

Post a New Response

(1284231)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 28 23:56:20 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor INADVERTENTLY gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by italianstallion on Tue Apr 28 23:51:02 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Bullshit. Nothing "inadvertent" about it unless she's completely incompetent—there are no "reasons" for saying that; it's called backpedaling.

Are you just this stupid for a living? Tell it to the people who are in the hospital thanks to the thugs who took the mayor at her word.

Post a New Response

(1284232)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 28 23:56:31 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by gp38/r42 chris on Tue Apr 28 19:39:21 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Well ... if you're going to drag me along that path, I can think of a few. :)

Post a New Response

(1284233)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 28 23:57:52 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by FtGreeneG on Tue Apr 28 23:50:47 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
? Did anyone mention Obama outright here? Stay on topic.

Post a New Response

(1284234)

view threaded

Re: Salon: Baltimore violence, especially wrecking cop cars, is ''legitimate political strategy''

Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 28 23:58:46 2015, in response to Re: Benji Hart: Baltimore violence, especially wrecking cop cars, is ''legitimate political strategy'', posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Apr 28 22:56:31 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
That's because you're a bigger idiot than JournalSquare-K-Car.

Post a New Response

(1284236)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by FtGreeneG on Wed Apr 29 00:01:00 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 28 23:57:52 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Fred G mentioned Obama

Post a New Response

(1284237)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Fred G on Wed Apr 29 00:04:41 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 28 23:57:52 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I did so shaddup.

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(1284238)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor INADVERTENTLY gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by italianstallion on Wed Apr 29 00:06:10 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 28 23:56:20 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Are YOU this stupid for a living? No mayor condones destruction of her city. The rest of her statement that day, and all her other actions in trying to quell the riots put the lie to your ridiculous interpretation. You WANT to believe what you say because she is a liberal, and you WANT to believe all liberals think that riots by the underprivileged are OK. Well I have news for you, we don't.

Post a New Response

(1284240)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor INADVERTENTLY gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Fred G on Wed Apr 29 00:06:58 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor INADVERTENTLY gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by italianstallion on Wed Apr 29 00:06:10 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Pwned.

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(1284242)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 29 00:07:28 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor INADVERTENTLY gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by italianstallion on Wed Apr 29 00:06:10 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Bullshit again. Save it. You're a racist again too.

Post a New Response

(1284243)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Fred G on Wed Apr 29 00:08:14 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 29 00:07:28 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You just hate brains. LEL

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(1284244)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor INADVERTENTLY gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 29 00:08:21 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor INADVERTENTLY gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by italianstallion on Wed Apr 29 00:06:10 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
They need their ridiculous narrative to make their own shit float. And it still sinks. :)

They have their slogan and by God, they're marching with it. Does anyone seriously expect any logic? :(

Post a New Response

(1284245)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 29 00:10:18 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by Fred G on Wed Apr 29 00:08:14 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You just hate brains

Only more than the zombie that ate yours.

I tried calf brains once, though.

Post a New Response

(1284246)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 29 00:11:06 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by Fred G on Wed Apr 29 00:08:14 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d

Post a New Response

(1284247)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 29 00:11:30 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor INADVERTENTLY gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 29 00:08:21 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
It's only the left that has a narrative. The truth has no agenda.

Any mayor who says stuff like this for any reason, incompetence included, has G2G.

Post a New Response

(1284248)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Fred G on Wed Apr 29 00:12:17 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 29 00:10:18 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I tried calf brains once, though.

I have too. They were offal.

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(1284249)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Fred G on Wed Apr 29 00:13:16 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 29 00:11:06 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
There it is!

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(1284250)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 29 00:28:55 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 29 00:11:30 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
But your narrative is completely broken. What the mayor said was never parsed correctly for what it meant, and you guys are breaking out the comfy chair and expecting the Spanish Inquisition without benefit of rosary beads. It's comical if it wasn't so tragic.

I mean ... your side completely lost its mind when the likes of Cruz and Paul and Nugent floated to the top of the septic tank. And now y'all just keep coming back and proving it.

So let's take this "conservative logic" to its ultimate destination. Obama calls out the National Guard and hunts you all down and becomes President for the third time and paints the White House Red.

You can return to your homes now and put out those torches, the curtains will catch fire. :)

Post a New Response

(1284253)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Apr 29 00:49:16 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 28 23:38:00 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Klutz

Post a New Response

(1284254)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Apr 29 00:50:11 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 28 23:38:33 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Your homies.

Post a New Response

(1284255)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Apr 29 00:55:07 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 29 00:07:28 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
He's a WUT.

Post a New Response

(1284256)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 29 00:57:25 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Apr 29 00:50:11 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Actually, my homie in Baltimore was white. Dan Lawrence. Don't know anybody else down there anymore. I used to live down there when I was in Junior High.

Post a New Response

(1284257)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Apr 29 00:58:09 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 29 00:57:25 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Jerry Kelly.

Post a New Response

(1284258)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Apr 29 00:58:40 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 29 00:07:28 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
He's a WUT.

Post a New Response

(1284259)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Apr 29 00:58:46 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 28 23:38:33 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Your homies.

Post a New Response

(1284264)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Edwards! on Wed Apr 29 01:54:16 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 28 17:46:38 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Exactly

Post a New Response

(1284268)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor INADVERTENTLY gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Edwards! on Wed Apr 29 02:15:47 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor INADVERTENTLY gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by italianstallion on Wed Apr 29 00:06:10 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
STFU,dimwitt.
You bring nothing to the conversation but brainless bullshit.

Post a New Response

(1284269)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Apr 29 02:15:50 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by Edwards! on Wed Apr 29 01:54:16 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
hey Edwards!, what's up with the comeback?

Post a New Response

(1284271)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Edwards! on Wed Apr 29 02:18:07 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 29 00:07:28 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
.STFU.. dimwitt asshole.

Post a New Response

(1284272)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Edwards! on Wed Apr 29 02:19:02 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Apr 29 00:58:40 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You haven't learned,yet.
But you will.

Post a New Response

(1284273)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor INADVERTENTLY gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 29 02:19:53 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor INADVERTENTLY gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by Edwards! on Wed Apr 29 02:15:47 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I think you might have missed the wrong post there, "Stallion" is one of us there.

Post a New Response

(1284275)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor INADVERTENTLY gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by Edwards! on Wed Apr 29 02:41:06 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor INADVERTENTLY gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by Edwards! on Wed Apr 29 02:15:47 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
My bad..that was directed at the instigation mob ,who see this as the perfect opportunity to bare fangs...
Guess they didn't get the memo about How the Riots stared...after the funeral... how they basically were attack on the street while marching by people throwing things like rocks chairs...calling them 'niggers'...and you'd be surprised who was WITH the Provokers...
BPD...

Got sent a video from one of my cousins,who took part in that peaceful protest....where what I described was show ...
No one is excusing such behavior... its just strange to me that no one mentioned any of what I just spoke of..

Post a New Response

(1284277)

view threaded

Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy''

Posted by ntrainride on Wed Apr 29 02:44:43 2015, in response to Re: Baltimore mayor gave ''space'' to those who ''wished to destroy'', posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Apr 27 21:03:39 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
that smiley at the end of nearly all of your postings...weird. compuserve, anyone?

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8]

< Previous Page  

Page 4 of 8

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]