Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062 (1159579) | |
Home > OTChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
Page 3 of 3 |
(1159933) | |
Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062 |
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 27 16:06:28 2014, in response to Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Feb 27 15:56:55 2014. I should attack you but you're losing several other threads today. |
|
(1159935) | |
Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062 |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 27 16:18:57 2014, in response to Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 27 16:06:00 2014. They want all the attention. |
|
(1159936) | |
Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062 |
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 27 16:22:14 2014, in response to Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 27 16:18:57 2014. yet AlM says I'm never attacked. |
|
(1159940) | |
Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062 |
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Feb 27 16:40:06 2014, in response to Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 27 16:22:14 2014. I didn't say never. :) |
|
(1159951) | |
Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062 |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Feb 27 17:03:38 2014, in response to Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062, posted by TonyG on Thu Feb 27 09:22:29 2014. I was talking more nationally, the national party does require certain things of each state's group which is why the GOP is all but dead in New York. That shit just doesn't sell here. |
|
(1159952) | |
Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062 |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Feb 27 17:07:51 2014, in response to Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062, posted by FYBklyn1959 on Thu Feb 27 10:35:07 2014. Well ... she pretty much cleared the air on that one. :)There's so many crazies in the GOP that I'd fill Unca Larry's hard drive if I mentioned them all. |
|
(1159977) | |
Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062 |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Feb 27 18:44:50 2014, in response to Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 27 16:06:28 2014. The only threads I have lost have to the man called edward. |
|
(1160012) | |
Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062 |
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 27 20:00:56 2014, in response to Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Feb 27 18:44:50 2014. I really did not follow that feud.But if you and Spider-Pig have a problem with my diet, I'm ready for that fight. |
|
(1160064) | |
Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062 |
|
Posted by Edwards! on Thu Feb 27 20:53:29 2014, in response to Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 27 01:12:14 2014. LOL... |
|
(1160098) | |
Re: Brewer had to (Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062) |
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Feb 27 22:09:01 2014, in response to Re: Brewer had to (Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062), posted by mtk52983 on Thu Feb 27 09:52:56 2014. At that point, you're telling and the baker would be permitted to refuse without penalty. The exceptions would be if the business owner's (or employee or independent contractor of the business)'s presence would be required externally in order to render the requested services and where failure to discriminate would violate other laws. |
|
(1160107) | |
Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062 |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Feb 27 22:50:35 2014, in response to Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 27 16:06:00 2014. That's not ironic. I just didn't respond to every post with it. |
|
(1160110) | |
Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062 |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Feb 27 22:56:58 2014, in response to Re: Ariz. Gov. SAYS NO to SB1062, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 27 20:00:56 2014. I don't have a problem with your diet. Sounds good to me. You just need to post about it less often, or at least start a dedicated thread about it. |
|
Page 3 of 3 |