|
|
| Re: One Dead In Brentwood Shooting (769991) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: One Dead In Brentwood Shooting |
|
|
Posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Mon Apr 25 02:12:16 2011, in response to Re: One Dead In Brentwood Shooting, posted by Easy on Mon Apr 25 01:44:46 2011. I do think that our middle class homes are nicer than yours, but your upper class homes are probably nicer. Our suburbs tend to be newer and have much smaller yards than yours.My mom and I watch House Hunters, and I'd note that SoCal's housing stock is different and nicer, but it's absurdly overpriced. But yes, as you noted, our homes are older, so you'll see a decent bit of housing stock from the 1920s and 1930s in some areas, and desirable suburban housing may mean buying homes that are around that age in a few cases. I live in what's deemed to be a great area, but it's a 52 year old 1800 sq ft home sitting on a 60 X 100 plot*. I'd imagine that in other areas of the country, that's considered to be old housing stock for a "starter home" or "lower class family". I'm still mesmerized on how people want large yards that require landscapers or a whole assortment of tools to maintain. I'm happy with the small plot size, and I think I'd be content with the small yards seen in condo developments, and if I wanted larger land, I'd move upstate and buy land upstate in a forest that doesn't need to be mowed or maintained by a crew of landscapers every week. *For sampling purposes, my cousin from Canada thinks my house is huge but up there, they tend to build smaller homes. I never saw that show, so I can't say. So you're not attracted to rich white cougars? |
|
|
|