|
|
| Re: US appeals court upholds new Texas abortion rules (1170127) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: US appeals court upholds new Texas abortion rules |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Sat Apr 5 12:36:17 2014, in response to Re: US appeals court upholds new Texas abortion rules, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Apr 5 12:26:59 2014. I said it takes two.Yes, it takes two people to initiate a pregnancy. What does that have to do with bingbong's question as to why the man should have any say in the woman's reproductive choice? When you post something in response to a question, it's generally assumed you're trying to address that question, and since complaining about women who have sex is extremely common among anti-choicers, it was reasonable to ask you whether or not you were anti-choice yourself. How does that translate into your extreme, "so you are against abortion"? You exhibited traits common among anti-choicers, so I asked if you were an anti-choicer. You said you weren't, and I accepted that. I don't see what's so extreme there. You get this "idea" of someone in your head, and then no matter what, you assume the "extreme..." This statement is trivially disproven by the fact that I accepted you were pro-choice the minute you said you were. Also, the fact that I didn't "assume" you were anti-choice, I asked you if you were. ...as that's the only way you know how to debate or have conversation. It's funny. You know, considering that every second post you make consists of nothing but "lol," "lmao," or some variation on the concept of "you're crazy," you might want to think twice before claiming that other people don't know how to have a conversation. |
|
|
|