And now it can be told: How Anonymous saved the election (1012806) | |||
![]() |
|||
Home > OTChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
![]() |
And now it can be told: How Anonymous saved the election |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Nov 18 19:29:41 2012 In case folks were wondering why I was quietly enjoying the results of this past election, and was talking about "hacking the vote" and the shens in Ohio, the story can now be told ... this is NOT a joke, and authorities have now completed the preliminary portions of the investigation which would well end up with Karl Rove and pals in JAIL. :)It's all about Anonymous, Karl Rove and the Ohio vote. Certainly serves to explain why he was so apoplectic on election night after yet another strange server crash in the Ohio elections even after the Ohio machines had been patched. Anonymous "letter" posted two days after the elections ... http://videohighlights4u.blogspot.com/p/blog-page.html The Anonymous video "warning" to Rove which was posted to Youtube on Oct 22, 2012: The back story: http://www.examiner.com/article/anonymous-claims-to-have-blocked-gop-election-theft-with-ohio-firewall Now Thom Hartmann isn't the most credible "journalist" in the world, but he fleshed together the story, including a reference to author Craig Unger and his book "Boss Rove" which provides an amazing parallel between what happened in Ohio this year and what happened in 2004. Worth the view: More details here: http://motleynews.net/2012/11/16/anonymous-claims-to-have-hacked-into-karl-roves-orca-thus-stopping-his-vote-switching-2/ For the genuine tinfoil haberdashers, this little tidbit of discussion about Michael Connell and his involvement back in 2004 can be seen in this forum: http://www.gatorcountry.com/swampgas/showthread.php?p=6166147 Do I personally believe it? Well ... the video is authentic and done in the proper style with the correct speech synthesizer tuning. The "announcement" after the fact contains the proper style and wording and chatter on IRC on election night also confirms that something was up at the critical 11PM hour when the event transpired. The description of changing the access password to the system as the tallies began also is believable if they were already in there. They would have also likely survived the "software patches" that Karl Rove sued to stop (this is highly suspicious as well) and likely gathered a considerable amount of data while they were in there. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/2012/1105/Is-Ohio-voting-software-vulnerable-to-fraud-Court-to-hear-Election-Day-case http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/public/2012/11/ohio-voting-software-court-hearing.html I wonder if the house republicans could put aside the Petraeus love affair for a few minutes and hold some hearings on THIS instead. Seems a bit more relevant but then what would I know about "relevant?" :) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |