|
|
| Re: Why 2 Terminals for Q1? (345410) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > BusChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Why 2 Terminals for Q1? |
|
|
Posted by BusRider on Tue May 3 13:41:52 2022, in response to Re: Why 2 Terminals for Q1?, posted by BusMgr on Wed Apr 20 15:41:56 2022. Sorry for the delay on this. I would say either one of those in its own way. For instance, the Q1 duplicates the Q43, the historical nature of this route seems its operationally "past practice" both legally and institutionally.Now for this redesign plan, because of such limitations, is there a lack of ability to transform the route, while at the same time out right eliminate it? Service duplication that does not have a ridership component (either having a ridership generator or being an extra layer to ease congestion) is often quickly axed. Though the proposal appears to be minor, it still duplicates the Q43, combining with the Q6 is a mere extension. I am not familiar of the ridership dynamics or the area, but say to further improve couldn't it have been revamped into blue crosstown route to a new area as one example, leaving its duplication if it had too and open new opportunities? Possibly rerouting the Q100 up to that discontinued branch of the Q1 if walking distance is a concern. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|