|
|
| Re: Why 2 Terminals for Q1? (345296) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > BusChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Why 2 Terminals for Q1? |
|
|
Posted by New Flyer #857 on Sun Apr 17 08:35:33 2022, in response to Why 2 Terminals for Q1?, posted by nh153 on Sun Apr 17 03:14:30 2022. There are other routes with branches that don't have separate designations, such as the B41. Also, I still hold that the B44 SBS and the B82 SBS are sufficiently different from their local counterparts that they should have entirely different numerical designations.I'm not sure of the reasons, but loops in general seem to be just hated by MTA. When routes are short but have to form a loop anyway, there would be greater efficiency in just running them as such instead of making them layover halfway around a loop (B2 / B31 / B100 forming one giant loop together at Kings Hwy Station without any layovers is a fantasy of mine). The Q1 is probably long enough that taking away the layover(s) on the eastern end could hurt reliability. |
|
|
|