|
|
| Re: 2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics (905053) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
|
| (905271) | |
Re: 2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri Feb 26 07:23:04 2010, in response to Re: 2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics, posted by R36 #9346 on Fri Feb 26 01:28:17 2010. That is a very logical assumption for the change at Willets Point. |
|
|
| (905290) | |
Re: 2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics |
|
|
Posted by Concourse Express on Fri Feb 26 08:26:41 2010, in response to Re: 2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics, posted by R36 #9346 on Fri Feb 26 01:28:17 2010. What was the ridership at that station the year before CitiField construction began?I'm assuming you mean 2008; I've also included 2007 in case that was the year you were referring to: Willets Point ridership (2008) - 2,036,355 Willets Point ridership (2007) - 1,863,860 my blog |
|
|
| (905322) | |
Re: 2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics |
|
|
Posted by R36 #9346 on Fri Feb 26 10:13:37 2010, in response to Re: 2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics, posted by Concourse Express on Fri Feb 26 08:26:41 2010. 2009: 1,862,7202007: 1,863,860 2006: 1,735,867 As I expected. Ridership has dropped back to pre-CitiField levels. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (905329) | |
Re: ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
|
Posted by R36 #9346 on Fri Feb 26 10:29:54 2010, in response to Re: ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri Feb 26 07:18:39 2010. The so-called "ghost stations" on the IRT are also considered "closed," but each of them is more of an "official station" than Cortlandt/Greenwich is. They still have platforms! |
|
|
| (905345) | |
Re: ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Fri Feb 26 11:24:08 2010, in response to ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Concourse Express on Thu Feb 25 19:03:36 2010. Great job! |
|
|
| (905346) | |
Re: ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Fri Feb 26 11:25:40 2010, in response to Re: ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 25 22:07:24 2010. They really should look into perhaps extending all platforms to accomodate a 10-car train. |
|
|
| (905352) | |
Re: ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Fri Feb 26 11:45:32 2010, in response to Re: ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Feb 25 21:30:09 2010. 215th has been for a while. There's not a lot near it that isn't also near 207th on the A. |
|
|
| (905353) | |
Re: ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Fri Feb 26 11:46:34 2010, in response to Re: ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by brightonr68 on Thu Feb 25 21:59:13 2010. LOL Well maybe not the top 10, but it's nowhere near as hopeless as the Rockaway Park Branch. |
|
|
| (905361) | |
Re: ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
|
Posted by brightonr68 on Fri Feb 26 12:04:58 2010, in response to Re: ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri Feb 26 07:16:36 2010. a sleazy casino which will take more money from those who can least afford it and provide little to no benefit to the economy.A steve wynn project could be eventually expanded into a convention hotel and do very well because it is near jfk providing tax rev of out of state gamblers. The trick is to get out of state people to loose there money there That is why the lottery is just another tax or redistribution of money from the private sector to wasteful gov If the mta was in private (non subsidized hands) the workers would still have nice salary and benefits but the work rules would only be half as bad |
|
|
| (905425) | |
Re: ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
|
Posted by Concourse Express on Fri Feb 26 14:32:16 2010, in response to Re: ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by Grand Concourse on Fri Feb 26 11:24:08 2010. Thanks GC!! |
|
|
| (905437) | |
Re: ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri Feb 26 15:23:41 2010, in response to Re: ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by R36 #9346 on Fri Feb 26 10:29:54 2010. Now, those are not "closed", those are abandoned. They are not planning to abandon Cortlandt. |
|
|
| (906092) | |
Re: ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics*** |
|
|
Posted by B1bus on Sun Feb 28 15:25:36 2010, in response to Re: ***2009 Annual Subway Ridership Statistics***, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri Feb 26 07:17:25 2010. Yep, yuppies. |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
